Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Explain Why Russia Was a Difficult Country to Govern Before 1905

Good Essays
827 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Why Russia Was a Difficult Country to Govern Before 1905
History Pre AS Task

Explain why Russia was a difficult country to govern before 1905

* Russia is a very big country so it would be hard to keep it all under control. One-sixth of the world.

* Because it was big it was hard to communicate with people with the lack of technology they had.

* It was also hard to get to place so it would be hard to keep people under control if something happened as it would take a long time to get there.

* Because of the geographical landscape of Russia it was hard to get trade into Russia.

* There were many different tribes and religions so many people wouldn’t help or talk to each other.

* Not everybody spoke Russian as many neighbouring countries started where taken by Russia but didn’t speak Russian.

* Lack of communication.

* Many different religions

* People would start little conflicts between religions.

* It was hard to get the army to a certain place of Russia if there was a war because of the size and geographical landscape.

* Many people wanted rights and a democratic government but other people wanted the opposite. This made people unhappy.

* The economy was bad as it was hard to collect money or even get money because of the sheer size of Russia.

* Many people ruled Russia within 30 years before 1905. This made it hard for the country to get used to the laws if they changed. * Laws were hard to imply as the country was the biggest in the world.

How far were these difficulties likely to cause problems for the tsarist government in the first decades of the twentieth century?
There were many difficulties that caused problems for the tsarist government. One main reason involved politics and how the country was ruled. The Russia of the tsars in the 19th century was a monarchy. The Tsarist government experienced many difficulties with the opposition. There were many political parties who disagreed with the policies of the Tsar.
The aim of the Liberals was to introduce parliamentary democracy similar to those in the USA, France and Great Britain. This group achieved some success with the establishment of the Russian parliament, in 1906. The second major opposition group was the Social Revolutionaries who wished to create a new Russian society based on the traditional community of the peasant village. This would make it hard for the government as the opposition would get other people from Russia to join them and as there were many people in Russia this would make it easy for the parties but hard for the government as they weren’t able to control the people and make them obey by their way of governing the country.
The problems which the Tsar faced had been mostly brought upon himself before there was even a suggestion of war. Throughout his reign, Tsar Nicholas II had increasingly not talked with his people. On his orders, Cossack guards brutally murdered the 1905 revolution, memorialised as ‘Bloody Sunday’, and the 1912 Lena goldfields protests. This would increase to more violence against the Tsar which would eventually lead to the downfall of his government. After this people realised that their leader was not the benevolent idol they had previously adored, but a ruthless official determined to keep order so that he would benefit from it.
Tsar was doomed from the beginning because they could not adapt. Before long, calls for a more representative parliament were being demanded by the people of Russia. This wasn’t good as Russia was the biggest country in the world therefore there would be many people against the Tsar. The best way for Nicholas II to deal with such demands would have been to prevent future unrest by granting them, but this would have weakened the Tsars.
One big problem which may have made the Tsar collapse was World War One as it hit Russia hard and showed the weakness in Nicholas II. This may have forwarded the collapse of the Tsar as the people could see that he was not doing a good job at keeping the country safe.
The main reason which caused the collapse of the government was the sheer size of Russia as it started to be too much too control. This didn’t help the Tsars as they couldn’t communicate that easily with the people who live all over the country as the technology needed to do that had not yet been invented. This would allow the people of Russia to start riots and not get affected by the government. This also meant that laws were being broken and chaos was occurring. As Russia was so big Nicholas II thought that taking control of the army would make less people try to oppose him, but this did not help him as people didn’t think that he should control the army and this would make the people of Russia want to get him out of the government which later happened in 1918.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    APW CCOT Soviet Union

    • 1392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Russians were one of the only countries in Europe that didn’t participate in the Scramble for…

    • 1392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many of the opposition fled to other European countries where they continued to plot against the Tsar. This shows how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress politically by exiling all of their possible contenders. This allowed the Tsar to have much more control over Russia much like before Alexander ll reign. The persecution of Jews caused many to join radical parties and organisations. This shows us how there was not even the slightest bit of democracy within Russia, and how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress. Another major problem in Russia was the growing population of peasants. This caused famines within Russia in 1892 and 1893. This famine was a cause of many peasants death which shows how Russia did not have the money or resources to keep up with their growing population. This showed a lack in progress as they could not even support their country’s people with…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How far were divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881-1905?…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far were divisions amongst opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule, 1881 - 1905?…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Issues included the autocratic rulership, revolutionary trend, the political ineptitude of Tsar Nicholas II and the problems that arose from these. Social issues included effect of political rule and repression, …. TBC…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, Russia has developed differently from the “western” civilization. Russia started off as being similar to the “western” culture, but overtime developed into one that the west never saw. Russia was influenced in it’s development from the conquest of the Mongols to Peter I. Russia also had unique features that were a first for societies in Europe and the rest of the world. Russia throughout history has been conquered by many different groups of people, from the Mongols to Peter I, and has many unique features including how it’s society was influenced and how it can be compared to “western” civilization. Russia started out like many other “western” societies with a single prince and single dynasty.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the mid-1800s Russia was an Empire of over 100 years and of considerable size, with its only competitor being the larger British Empire, yet it was a country still firmly stuck in the…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The early twentieth century in Russia saw people from many different levels of society experience grievances due to the poor leadership and decision making of Nicholas II. Nicholas failed to see the problems his people were dealing with and was too caught up in keeping Russia under autocratic rule. The grievances the Russian people experienced ranged from political, social and economic. Each social class had different criticisms and issues with the Russian government but the dissatisfaction with the government was a shared feeling all over Russia. The social classes that experienced major grievances included the peasants, industrial workers and the nobility.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia is the largest country on Earth in terms of surface area. Russia has a history that suffered a split identity. Due to the diverse ethnic population that was spread across a vast area of land, Russia continuously suffered ethnic conflicts, armed wars, and political unrest. Therefore, being a sovereign nation or to find the national unity was always a struggle. Starting from 1237 for over two centuries, the Mongol Empire controlled the Russian principalities.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For centuries, Russia was cut off from most of Western civilization. This is due in part to Russia's geography. Russia has, what is called a natural barrier. Russia's natural barrier is simply its huge expanse. It is hundreds of miles from Moscow or St. Petersburg to any Western city. This isolation was a hindrance, and an advantage throughout history, politically, socially, and economically.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While in theory , the manner in which Russia was ruled undertook a considerable overhaul following the 1917 revolution . In reality the Country was governed with the Tsar and general security remaining as the ultimate authority with no real development occurring. Methods of oppression , propaganda and abusing civil rights were paramount in the rulings of all of the leaders be it Tsar or Communist. The largest change in the way in which Russia was ruled can be seen in the changing economy moving from open trade in the 1800's to the strict state capitalism of the 1900's. However few reforms had a direct impact in the way Russia was ruled thus meaning there was more continuity than change in the period 1855 to 1964.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    conditions under the tsar

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most of russias population was Russian but there were significant minorities including Ukrainians, Fins, Poles and Georgians.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suffragists Vs Suffragettes

    • 2627 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Russia is a country where there is lots of space, but there aren't many people occupying it. The communication in Russia is not very good because it is a really big country that had no way of defending itself. The government and the barriers that kept other countries from staying out of Russia did not work as much because they still couldn’t prevent invasions in their territory. The ending of World War I led to the deadline of the tsarist rule, which marked the beginning of a civil war. Vladimir Lenin and his party (Bolshevik), in 1920 he planted a communist rule which would administer the country of Russia for 71 years. The Russian country was always invaded by other neighbors (countries.) But Russia defended themselves by using two different types of methods. The first method was to abandon territories which they would back away, which forced the invaders to carry on all their supply, by leaving them out in really bad weather. The second method was to make the invaders use their ammo, by bringing out soldiers. But from the 1850’s - 1900’s, the force upon improvement did rise up. But they didn’t know to improve. There was a barrier between people which supported human rights and other that wanted something different. Commanding for improvement moved on between the 1860’s and the 1870’s. Slavery was was put at an end, and systems of courts by judges were set up. But…

    • 2627 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tsarist system of government underwent many changes throughout the years of 1881-1914. Both Alexander III and Nicholas II created several modifications, being both good and bad, to the government during these years. Alexander III created mostly negative changes, due to him being seen as a reactionary, whereas Nicholas II created mainly positive changes to the government as a result of the 1905 revolution. These changes can be categorised into political, economic and social modifications.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics