Preview

Explain the Criticisms of Plato's Theory of the Forms.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1600 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain the Criticisms of Plato's Theory of the Forms.
Plato's theory of forms, also called his theory of ideas, states that there is another world, separate from the material world that we live in called the "eternal world of forms". This world, to Plato, is more real than the one we live in. His theory is shown in his Allegory of the Cave (from The Republic, Book VII), where the prisoners only live in what they think is a real world, but really it is a shadow of reality. According to Plato, to the prisoners in the allegory and to humanity in the material world "truth would be literally nothing but shadows" and he believes us to be as ignorant as the people in the cave. Plato followed the belief that in order for something to be real it has to be permanent, and as everything in the world we live in is constantly changing, he assumed there must be something else. In his eternal world of forms, there is an ideal form of every object there is in this world. Plato answers the question "what is beauty?" by discovering the essence of true beauty. The reason one recognises something has being beautiful is because we have an innate knowledge of something that is beauty, i.e. we know of the form of true beauty in the eternal world of forms, and everything we see compares to that. Something is only beautiful if it shares characteristics with the form of beauty in the other world. The most important form is the form of the good, portrayed by the sun in the allegory of the cave.

Aristotle was Plato's main critic and was once a pupil of Plato. Aristotle and many other philosophers who came after Plato criticised Plato's view that these ideal forms had an independent existence. Many people believe that there must be something to which we compare all objects and something that makes something what it is and not something else. But that doesn't mean that it exists separate from our bodies. Plato does not prove, or even try and prove that these perfect forms are self-evident. It is Plato's disability to prove this that causes people



Bibliography: *Foundation for the Study of Religion - Libby Ahluwalia *Plato - R.M.Hare *Philosophy: an Introduction - Mel Thompson *Encarta - Plato

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plato developed the theory that behind every concept or object in the visible world there is an unseen reality which he calls its ‘Form’. These Forms exist in the world of the Forms separate from our world of sensory perception. Within the world of the Forms the pattern or the objects and concepts for the material world exist in a state of unchanging perfection. Plato suggested the idea of forms in his book “De Republica”, which is a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon, and the idea of dualism. Plato suggested that there are two worlds (dualism) we live in one of sensory perception and the true forms live in one of rational knowledge.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato makes a very big assumption where he says that F (Which means the ideal form of something) exists; purely because when we talk of a form in our world, we don’t think of it as the perfect F. Plato delivers no substantial evidence for their existence, just that believing F exists is a sensible notion and supports his theory. Simply put, just because a perfect form may exist in our mind and we possess an idea of it; doesn’t give evidence that it exists outside of our…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The largest criticism Plato faces is what if his theory of the forms, on which he basis his whole philosophy, is not existent? Plato was unable to prove or provide much detail on the forms and what they are, thus many argue against him suggesting that the forms are not…

    • 1451 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the beginning of the allegory, the “theory of forms” is also introduced. This theory states that the “existence of a level of reality inhabited by ideal “forms” of all things and concepts”(Plato pg1) indicating that there is a form to any object, Adding as well that all forms will be eternal and unchanging but they tend to inhabit changeable matter in the temporal world. Plato considers the realm of forms to be always eternal and unchanging however; the world we inhabit is a constantly changing, and thus not real because nothing last forever. Similar to the allegory, our perception of this world could also be like the shadows projected by the fire, although they are constantly changing, they all come from a particular object. Therefore,…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the story “The Allegory of the Cave” by Plato, these three prisoners have lived in a cave their whole life, chained and only able to see this wall. On this wall the only thing they can see is shadows from people and objects doing things in front to make shadows. By only seeing these shadows and nothing else the prisoners have no idea about the outside world, as one of them are released he goes and looks at everything he has not seen before. He then returns to his friends that are still kept in the cave and tries telling them what he has seen, what everything really is. They do not believe him or even know what he is saying because they have not seen the things he has. Plato wants the philosopher to understand life as it is, and know what everything is.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato thought that there were two worlds: the everyday changing world in which we exist, the world of becoming, and the unchanging world of eternal truths, the world of being. In this world of being Plato illustrates that the eidos, or forms, define what a substance truly is and that each and every thing has a Form on which it falls under. For example, we know the Form of a human so any human we come into contact with, regardless of size, shape, or color; we know to put them in the category of human because they fit the eternal Form. Depicted in his allegory of the cave, Plato comes to the belief that our everyday world is thought not to be an illusion but more like a “set…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s analogy of the cave he suggests that the prisoners are held back by their senses telling them that the world that they see is in fact reality, whereas Plato disagrees with this. Plato believed that once the escapee (Philosopher) is outside of the cave, that they can use the power of reason to truly know what reality is. He believes that the world around us is not real, and that the world of the forms is the true reality where we can gain knowledge and understanding.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diotima

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The primary way the proposal relates to Plato’s theory involves the top step of Diotima’s “ladder.” Diotima tells Socrates “that in that life alone, when he looks at Beauty in the only way that Beauty can be seen—only then will it become possible for him to give birth not to images of virtue… but to true virtue.” Because Plato’s theory states that ethereal, metaphysical ideas hold more true to reality than their tangible counterparts, this quote accurately reflects the basis of Plato’s Theory of the Form because true beauty is far beyond a physical image one can conjure. Another way the argument relates to the theory is the concept that the form of love is eternal, which Diotima’s explores in her story of the origin of love where she says that “by nature [love is] neither immortal nor mortal.” The fact that love can enter and leave someone’s life extremely quickly, only to return years later, further illustrates love as an eternal form, with a slight contradiction. While forms may be eternal, love is a form that follows a sporadic path, only to return to those open enough to climb the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato uses the Forms to try to show that the soul is eternal. He says that the soul and the body are different things, and the body is just a container for the soul. He even goes further by saying that the soul is trying to get back to its pure state. By these statements Plato is saying that the body is physical, which means that it is only temporary, it changes, and imperfect. On the other hand, the soul is non-physical and therefore is eternal, unchanging, perfect and universal. However, this is insufficient information to base his argument that all souls are the same on. All souls are different because every person is different. If the soul and makes a person and every person is different that means that every soul has its own personality or characteristics. This is shown everyday because know two people are exactly alike, not even twins. Aristotle talks about a similar reason for not following the Forms. Aristotle states that if the Forms are supposed to be perfect and unchanging, how is it possible for one thing to be better than the other. For example, it is like saying that beauty is an eternal Form that doesn’t change. However, in fact it does change because has the ability to be more beautiful than…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Platonist

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As mentioned before, Aristotle has different theories than Plato. He suggests that the forms can be discovered through a examination of the world being natural. Now, Plato believes that forms are farther than what humans can understand, it is way beyond.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Most of us, Socrates says, are like prisoners chained before a wall in a cave, unable to turn our heads. What we call reality is actually a mere shadow play on the wall, projected from behind our backs by persons carrying statues of humans and animals and carved likenesses of other ordinary objects before a fire that is behind them." (Rice, pp. 79) This allegory is attempting to simplify the ideas of forms and the reality of what is perceived as real. The prisoners in the cave are those people who have not achieved a philosophical understanding of forms, so they remain affixed by the shadows. The shadows are representing worldly objects, which we see with our senses. The prisoners see the shadows and believe that they are real, and they communicate with each other concerning these shadows because they do not know the truth. The statues carried in front of the fire are the true forms Plato speaks of. The forms are understood by philosophers who realize that worldly matter is simply a reflection of true…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s main idea in “The Allegory of the Cave”, was that people see reality as the visible world and nothing more. It begins with the supposition that if a group of prisoners were chained to the wall of a cave, and are able to see what was in front of them; with a fire behind them, they would only be capable of seeing the shadows of the images as they passed by the fire. The prisoners would begin to identify the shadows as their reality. However, if one of the prisoners were to escape from the cave, he would be incapable of seeing anything at first, because the light would be too bright. As time passed, his eyes would gradually begin to focus, he would begin to see images more clearly. If the freed prisoner was to go back to the cave, he would find that it would be impossible to abide back to his old world. He would not be able to recognize the shadows in the cave,…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Euthyphro Dilemma

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Religion and morality have been seen as inseparable since the advent of Western thought (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/religion-morality/) - religion's fundamental characters being frequently ethical in nature, and morality often viewed as a derivative of religion. However, the relationship is not as clear cut as many people would like you to believe. A very old and important dilemma facing this relationship is the Euthyphro dilemma, discussed in Plato’s Euthyphro. In it, Socrates and Euthyphro argue about the nature of morality outside of a court. Socrates is being prosecuted for impiety, while Euthyphro is charging his father with murder. Although charging your father, even for murder, is frowned upon in Ancient Greek culture, Euthyphro justifies it by claiming that this is similar to what the Gods have been reported to have done, and therefore it is alright. After multiple definitions of holiness and piety, Socrates brings up the Euthyphro dilemma , which when adapted to a monotheistic context where God is an all-powerful, all-knowing being (which I will be using), goes:…

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Wycliffe was a 14th-century English philosopher, theologian, and religious reformer, whose egalitarian ideas and beliefs laid the foundation for the Protestant Reformation. As Peter W. Williams notes in the World Book Advanced, Wycliffe was born sometime between 1320 and 1330 A.D. in Yorkshire, England, and was educated at Balliol College, University of Oxford (Williams). According to Alessandro Conti in his entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, John Wycliffe was trained in the “scholasticism of the medieval Roman Catholic Church,” and became disillusioned with ecclesiastical abuses (Conti). He challenged the Church’s spiritual authority and sponsored the translation of the Christian Scriptures into English. Although the church condemned him as a heretic, John Wycliffe, the so-called “Morning Star of the Reformation”, was influential not only during his lifetime in areas from politics to religion, but also after his death when his ideas and teachings inspired the beginnings of the Protestant Reformation (Lambert 43).…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Allegory Of The Cave

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato proposes in his philosophy The Allegory of the Cave that most people are bound to their obliviousness and materialism, either by willful rejection or ignorance, which in turn makes them metaphorically blind to the true nature of reality. For instance, the people chained within the dark cave is a symbol for the world we currently reside in (or was resided in), and the chains represent each one of us, who are either knowingly or unknowingly chained to the material world. The shadows the cave dwellers saw is a metaphor for both perception and illusion. For example, what one person perceives as reality and the truth (e.g. the shadows in the cave), is nothing but a mere illusion, even though they perceive it to be the truest reality.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays