Preview

Explain Aristotle's understanding of the Prime Mover

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1238 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Aristotle's understanding of the Prime Mover
Explain Aristotle's understanding of the Prime Mover (25 marks)
In Aristotle's book the Metaphysics, he calls the cause of all movement the Prime Mover (P.M). The Prime Mover to Aristotle is the first of all substances, the necessary first sources of movement which itself is unmoved. It is a being which is eternal, and in Metaphysics Aristotle also calls this being ‘God’. However, before he came to know the existence of the P.M he first started noticing the constant changes around him, which led him to question the existence and the purpose of the world, universe and the things around us.
He examined that everything that exists was in a permanent state of 'movement' or 'motion'. By 'motion' Aristotle was linking it to the Greek word 'motus' which refers to change. He noticed that everything in the universe is in a state of change, for example, the weather and seasons are always changing. Even the human body is going through the process of change every single day. Everyday the body changes, we grow old and age, we lose hair and skin cells.
This led Aristotle to observe four things:
1) The physical world was constantly in a state of motion and change.
2) The planets seemed to be moving eternally.
3) Change or motion is always caused by something.
4) Objects in the physical world were in a state of actuality and potentiality.
Summing up from these four points Aristotle came to a conclusion that something must exist which causes the motion and change to occur without being moved itself and the 'uncaused change' must be eternal. Aristotle reached this conclusion by observing that if something can change, it exists in one 'actual' state and has the 'potential' to become another state, for example, an actual child is potentially an adult and a cow in a field is potentially a piece of roast beef. He realised that if things come to existence they must be caused to exist by something else and if something is capable of change that means it is potentially

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aristotle Research Paper

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He thought that each thing or event has more than one reason that helps to explain what, why, and where that thing or event is. Greek thinkers from earlier on thought that only one kind of cause could explain itself. Aristotle, on the other hand, said four could. The four causes he spoke of were: material cause, efficient cause, formal cause, and the final cause. For example, he would say that the material cause of a house is the supplies from which it was built. The efficient cause of the house would be the builder. The formal cause would be the shape the builder decided upon. The final cause would be the house's function, to be a home. Aristotle said that something could be understood more when its causes are in specific terms rather than in general ones. Therefore, Aristotle would say that it is more informative to know that a builder built the house rather than to know that it was built by a man. Even further, he would say that it was more informative to know who the builder was rather than just knowing that a builder built…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Title

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the next column, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle published Metaphysics and Alexander the Great was not content with him doing so. Alexander believed that by publishing the book, Aristotle believed that he was uncovering all the secrets to the masses. Alexander thought that knowing the secrets of metaphysical knowledge was what made him unique, and is should not have made its way to the light and everyone’s acknowledgement.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle was a Greek philosopher who was fascinated by the physical world around him which he wanted to understand and explain. Aristotle highly admired his tutor Plato; however he dismissed his theories about the alternative world of forms and the true form of objects. Instead he tried to explain why things exist as they do in the real world. Aristotle believed we can only know a thing fully when all its causes of existence are understood. So he explored how things come into existence and tried to analyse how we identify objects. He realized that the human brain automatically categorizes everything based on its matter, shape, creator and purpose, in order to identify its common name. Aristotle developed this idea further and proposed the theory of the four causes; which explain why a thing exists as it does. He called these the material, formal, efficient and final causes.…

    • 788 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Metaphysics is defined as “The study or theory of reality; sometimes used more narrowly to refer to transcendent reality, that is, reality which lies beyond the physical world and cannot therefore be grasped by means of the senses.” It simply asks what is the nature of being? Metaphysics helps us to reach beyond nature as we see it, and to discover the `true nature' of things, their ultimate reason for existing.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Medieval World View Essay

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aristotle believes that “the earth is the center of the universe, and everything revolves around them” . This idea which is called Aristotle’s Universe was adopted by the medieval church and to challenge this view of the Universe was not merely a scientific issue; it became a theological one as well, and subjected dissenters to the considerable and not always benevolent power of the Church. So making people think that God put the earth at the center of the everything and the church being the peoples connection to God putting all the power into their…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle, being the first historian of philosophy, categorized his predecessors according to how they’ve answered the central questions of the human mind – the question of the first principle of all things. It is otherwise known as the Four Causes. He defined science as knowledge through causes. This doctrine of causes is scattered in different Aristotelian treatises but have its highlight in his book Metaphysics.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle is one of the greatest philosophers that have ever lived. He offered answers to questions in life from his learning from another great philosopher, Plato. His beliefs of the ultimate nature of reality focused on a teleological universe. This meant that everything was moving towards its telos or goal in life. He said that materials are fully real and are what senseperception reveals. “Tode ti” was his famous quote meaning this thing here. These real materials in life were all trying to move to their telos. They were very mechanical, and were just moving because it was their goal to reach during their life time.…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle completely disagreed with some parts of Plato’s theories, despite the fact he was his teacher. He respectfully made it known that he had identified four causes that explain why or why not an object or living being exists. They were known as Aristotle’s four causes which included; the material cause, the formal cause, the efficient cause and the final cause. The material cause is very basic and asks the question: what is the object made of? What material? The formal cause asks what give the material its structure. For example, my bookcase has to be set up a certain way in order for it to stay in place and hold my books. If it didn’t hold my books, it wouldn’t be a bookcase. The efficient cause asks why the thing or object exists, why is it here? Who brought it here? A good example of this is you and me. Why are we here? We are here because of our parents. However this led Aristotle to ask who made you parents and who made their parents and so on and so forth. Is there such a thing as infinite regression? Perhaps there is however it is unknown to us. Finally we come to the last cause called the final cause which asks what its purpose is. What is the purpose of the bookcase in my bedroom? Simply, to hold my books. By constantly asking “what is the purpose of this object?” you end up asking more questions, which will then lead onto more complicated questions which will again, go onto infinite regression. A constant cycle of questions is asked and yes although we can answer the pretty basic ones, we then find ourselves asking harder ones for example: Is there a God? The final cause is heavily linked with the teleological argument.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Argument

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page

    What is a good argument? Aristotle’s was the first person to have a formal theory for argument. He states that an argument is “When, certain things being so, something else results from these by their being so (either generally or for the most part) – there (in the Topics) this is called deduction, here it is called enthymeme” (Rhetoric I.2, 1356b16–18). It’s very interesting how Aristotle’s saw an argument from very different ways. In my opinion an argument is just the view of things from different perspective. I can’t understand how he can relate many words and concepts to this simple word. As Dr. King ask in lecture, what is a good argument? Is the big question. He combined fallacies, validity and induction to create a good…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9 of Aristotle's Physics: A Guided Study can be understood in such a way that it…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The third cause according to Aristotle is the efficient cause. This cause explains why the thing exists; how it has become what it is. Aristotle said that the efficient cause is ‘the primary source of change’ as it explains something at the point at which change occurs. In the…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Elements of Argument

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    For hundreds of years there had been only one excepted way of written argument, which was Aristotle’s model. Now there are several more, including Rogers and the Toumlin Rhetoric’s. Every day we face different situations, some good some bad. When the one situation comes up where you are left in disagreement with another person, have you ever thought of how you can argue over the matter? Clearly most do not, and will argue their point until they win or the other person finally understands. I can honestly say I have never thought of how I will argue any matter, until I read about three different forms of written arguments in our text book in English class. In this paper we will go over the three different forms by Aristotle, Carl Rogers, and Stephen Toulmin. Each has their own effective way to get to the point of the argument. The Aristotelian and Toulmin Models are good forms of argument. Though with the Rogerian method the way he uses his empathetic ways is the one for me.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle`S Casualty

    • 4676 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Aristotle was not the first person to engage in a causal investigation of the world around us. From the very beginning, and independently of Aristotle, the investigation of the natural world consisted in the search for the relevant causes of a variety of natural phenomena. From the Phaedo, for example, we learn that the so-called “inquiry into nature” consisted in a search for “the causes of each thing; why each thing comes into existence, why it goes out of existence, why it exists” (96 a 6–10). In this tradition of investigation, the search for causes was a search for answers to the question “why?”. Both in the Physics and in the Metaphysics Aristotle places himself in direct continuity with this tradition. At the beginning of the Metaphysics Aristotle offers a concise review of the results reached by his predecessors (Metaph. I 3–7). From this review we learn that all his predecessors were engaged in an investigation that eventuated in knowledge of one or more of the following causes: material, formal, efficient and final cause. However, Aristotle makes it very clear that all his predecessors merely touched upon these causes (Metaph. 988 a 22–23; but see also 985 a 10–14 and 993 a 13–15). That is to say, they did not engage in their causal investigation with a firm grasp of these four causes. They lacked a complete understanding of the range of possible causes and their systematic interrelations. Put differently, and more boldly, their use of causality was not supported by an adequate theory of causality. According to Aristotle, this explains why their investigation, even when it resulted in important insights, was not entirely successful.…

    • 4676 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Time

    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages

    that motion could be slower or faster but not time. Aristotle did not have the privilege of knowing about…

    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays