Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Existential Crisis In Waiting For Godot

Powerful Essays
1511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Existential Crisis In Waiting For Godot
: Existential crisis in Waiting for Godot

The absurd plays deal with the themes of existentialism, especially the existentialist theme of absurdity. The absurd playwrights tried to translate the contemporary existentialism philosophy into the drama. The absurd playwrights also tried to portray the distressful condition of the humans. In Waiting for Godot the human condition is shown as a dismal and distressful state. The derelict man struggles to live or rather exist, in a hostile and uncaring world.
Waiting for Godot directs us to consider “What they mean” and its reflection to the world we live in. The tramps lack of knowledge about everything seems to be a metaphor for mankind’s lack of basic understanding of the universe and life itself. The creation of the entire universe is a big question mark, especially for those who do not want to believe Christianity’s religious theory that God created the world in seven days. Modern science fills the role of religion by trying to find reasonable answers for these questions, but the truth is that we know neither our creation nor end. We are born, live, educate ourselves, get married, become old, get sick and finally we die. The path of life cannot be accurately speculated and is completely unknown. Throughout the play we come across hundreds of questions that have no answers, consequently paralleling our lives because we never understand what, where and how life has brought us to the present moment. When Beckett was asked, he did not have any answers, but chose to leave the interpretation to the audience. As Esslin writes, “It was an expression, symbolic in order to avoid all personal error, by an author who expected each member of his audience to draw his own conclusions, make his own errors”(1961)
Another important issue in the play is the characters’ names. A person’s name is an important signifier of his existence, but the audience’s perception of the tramps is confused since they go by many names given to them by different people. The tramps go by names including Vladimir, Didi, Albert, Estragon, Gogo and Adam. There are no two people who call them the same name, as Estragon calls Vladimir, Didi, the boy calls him “Mr. Albert”, and Vladimir calls Estragon Gogo, but Estragon introduces himself to Pozzo as “Adam”. So who are they, and what are their identities? The audience is left in darkness about the identity of the protagonists whereupon the unknown becomes the most significant issue, as is typical in the genre of the absurd.
Among the little information given about everything we are supposed to assume that the tramps are waiting for Godot to come as Vladimir says “In this immense confusion one thing alone is clear. “We are waiting for Godot to come”
Nevertheless, the audience is in a complete fog when it comes to Godot’s identity. After such a long time waiting they still doubt the name of the person they have been expecting; Estragon asks “His name is Godot? Vladimir “I think so”. He does not reply “yes”, but that he “thinks so”, and that the person they have been waiting for such a long time might be “Godot” or someone else. Although the play manipulates the memory of its characters it seems that they certainly have not met Godot before:

Vladimir: Oh he’s a …he’s a kind of acquaintance.
Estragon: Nothing of the kind, we hardly know him.
Vladimir: True…we don’t know him very well…but all the same…
Estragon: Personally I wouldn’t even know him if I saw him.

The entire plot flows with the hope of this mysterious character’s arrival. When Beckett was asked by Alan Schneider (who was to direct the first American production of the play) who or what does it means by Godot, the answer was “If I knew, I would have said so in the play”. Over the last sixty years critics have suggested that Godot is happiness, eternal life, love, death, silence, hope, time, God and many other things. Indeed, it seems Godot is everything, at the same time he is nothing. The identity of Godot is like listening to a blind man who is asked to describe an object or person. Esslin says that “It has been suggested that Godot is a weakened form of the word God”. However, the possibility that Godot might represent “God” is more often acknowledged than any other suggestion, according to what little description of Godot is given in the text and the two protagonists’ excitement to meet him. They hope that “Godot will bring purpose and meaning”, into their lives. The impression we have of Godot may well be of God or of some sort of a prophet; he certainly seems a rather patriarchal figure, just as God is commonly conceived. The tramps are frightened about Godot’s arrival as Esslin’s observes in The Theatre of the Absurd- (Godot’s) coming is not a source of pure joy; it can also mean damnation. When Estragon, in the second act, believes Godot to be approaching, his first thought is, ‘I’m accused’. And as Vladimir triumphantly exclaims, ‘It’s Godot! At last! Let’s go and meet him’, Estragon runs away shouting, ‘I’m in hell! (1961)

Their fear manifested when Pozzo and Lucky approach the stage. They think one of the pair is Godot, suggesting religious awe because they are frighten and panic. Beckett’s description for the event:

Estragon drops the carrot. They remain motionless, then together make a sudden rush towards the wings. Estragon stop halfway, runs back, picks up the carrot, stuffs in his pocket, runs to rejoin Vladimir. Huddled together, shoulders hunched, cringing away from the menace, they wait.

Similarly, the characteristics of Godot, based on what we hear from the boy who works for him, is only that Godot does “nothing”, and that he has a “white beard”, demonstrates the image we have for God. However, Godot’s mysteriousness makes the audience more and more curious and confused when attempting to predict who Godot is. Indeed, whoever Godot is seems to be an important part of the tramps’ lives, perhaps the only hope of their lives. This is the reason that they waited so long and, according to Pozzo who claims that Godot has a vital power over the tramps. Pozzo asks when the tramps are going to leave:

What happens in this case to your appointment…with this Godet…Godot…Godin… anyhow you see who I mean, who has your future in his hands.

The possibility that Godot might represent “tomorrow” also could be reasonable way of interpreting who he is. It is obvious that the tramps in Waiting for Godot have been waiting for Godot for a long time, even though the person “didn’t say for sure he’d come”. During the play, the audience witnesses neither any accomplishment, nor any loss within these two days, and we come to realize that somehow the tramps’ intention is to meet Godot, and waiting is the action they choose to accomplish their desire. The most revealing example in this case is the most famous refrain in the play—
ESTRAGON: Let's go.
VLADIMIR: We can't.
ESTRAGON: Why not?
VLADIMIR: We're waiting for Godot.
ESTRAGON: (despairingly). Ah!

They are hoping that if Godot does not come “today” then he may come “tomorrow”, but when tomorrow arrives it is the same hope once again, and it is again “tomorrow” which will never arrive. Therefore, the illusion of “tomorrow” reflects Godot, although the tramps may not be ready accept the fact that Godot is an illusion, and that he may only be a fictional figure in the mind of Vladimir. However, this cannot be certain, as the tramps are going to be waiting tomorrow for Godot, he may appear tomorrow denying all our arguments.

However, since the audience is in the darkness about who Godot really is, the audience has many choices in interpreting him. The fact that there are so few details of one of the main characters makes it difficult for the audience to figure out what sort of character they are waiting for, and therefore they can apply their own hopes and expectations to Godot’s identity.

Since the tramps have been waiting “Fifty years maybe”, it is understandable for the tramps to be frustrated after they have been manipulated for so many years. Throughout the play, although Vladimir persuades Estragon not to give up hope on Godot, Godot’s absence makes Vladimir frustrated, disappointed as well depressed when they do not attain what they are waiting for, he goes on:

Or for night to fall. (Pause.) We have kept our appointment and that’s an end to that. We are not saints, but we have kept our appointment. How many people can boast as much?

When their only hope fades away, they become hopeless and that may be the reason they came up with the idea of hanging themselves. Thus every moment of every day, mankind waits for some sign from God that his suffering will end. And every day, God does not arrive. Thus the existential crisis arises in the play.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Romeo and Juliet Essay

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout this essay I will analyse characterisation, stagecraft, language and context when exploring the themes of the play and when considering what the audience learns as a result.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This thing i.e. the awareness about the lack of purpose produces a state of metaphysical anguish which is the central theme of the Absurd Theatre. On an absurd play logical construction, rational ideas and intellectually viable arguments are abandoned and instead of these the irrationality for experience is acted out on the stage.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Waiting for Godot’ by Samuel Beckett largely ignores the standard conventions of theatre. To challenge these conventions Beckett utilises a circular plot, provides only obscure hints to where and when the play is set, breaks the fourth wall all too regularly and explores themes that were previously obscured from mainstream theatre.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of absurdity is often taken on in existentialism. While Rosencrantz and Guildenstern don't laugh at Hamlet, they do represent a sort…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s Hamlet was written in the sixteenth century Elizabethan historical context, where certainty was questioned and there was a growing importance of individuals and their choice as opposed to fate. Influenced by the Renaissance, Shakespeare wrote in the tradition of the revenge tragedy. Stoppard however, who was living in a time of disillusionment due to the tragedies of two world wars, was influenced by the existential movement. Disregarding the past and future due to a lack of trust, Stoppard wrote in a tradition known as the Theatre of the Absurd incorporating existentialism. He uses various processes to adapt and transform the values and ideas influenced by the sixteenth century Elizabethan context in Hamlet to reflect the twentieth century evasion of reality unless it is in a reflexive and directionless present.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Renaissance, finding oneself seemed to be a major theme. Most of the plays, in the renaissance age, focused on one thing, what to do when one experiences an existential crisis. Shakespeare’s Hamlet explores existential crisis through Young Hamlet’s inability to act. Just like Hamlet, I suffer an existential crisis; Whether or not I will go to college, and yet I am delaying until the very end. Hamlet’s inability to act comes from his existential crisis because of his paralysis through over analysis.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    11. The theatre of the absurd was formulated by which existential writing of French Essayist and playwright? Albert Camus…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Waiting for Godot

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This is a quote from one of the most prominent works of the “Theatre of the Absurd” category, Samuel Becketts’ ‘Waiting For Godot’. In Queensland Theatre Company’s version, the play is about two characters named Vladimir and Estragon, who are waiting expectantly for a man named Godot, although he never comes. This play is set in a wide plain of bush, with a single dead tree in the middle. It is based around false hope and deceit, like a cruel game, involving these men amongst other characters. Over the duration of the play, Vladimir and Estragon watch their hopes crash down in front of them, over and over again. Despite not knowing what Godot looks like, and if he will ever show up, they wait, through the cold night and into the early hours of morning. The contrasts in this play were very interesting, such as Movement and stillness, Dark and Light, and Hope and Hopelessness.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we have seen, the language of the characters in a play is the most important way of defining their nature, their social status and their emotional make-up. Try to imagine forming an idea of the people in this play from their actions alone. The result would be flat, often incomprehensible unless the actors adopted the exaggerated gestures of mime.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Meanings of Life as Conveyed Through the Use of Lack of Closure Reflecting upon two very famous and unique works, the story called “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas”, written by Ursula LeGuin and the play known as “Waiting for Godot” by Samuel Beckett, one can see various commonalities and variations among both of these narratives by analyzing the function of the prevalent lack of closure, unanswered questions and narrative gaps that exist in both. First of all, “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas”, written by Ursula LeGuin, is a uniquely written story which impeccably illustrates a narrator’s articulation of the making of a story within a fictional story itself (Posella 1). This story is very distinct from others by how the narrator tends to switch and interchange story worlds, displaying indecision and conflict within the…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life is made up of routines and patterns. Every human being has their own unique system of how they carry themselves through the day. These systems are how we survive, and they tend to become part of our subconscious. But there are those who get so caught up in their own conformity that daily life becomes much more demanding than it should be. The results of this perpetual routine can cause someone to forget who they are as a person, and what they are meant to do outside of daily life. Due to the foreboding repetition of their own daily lives, the protagonists in both Hamlet and Waiting for Godot neglect their true purpose, which…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Halfway House

    • 2275 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Even the characters of the play are seen to engage in a constant search of meaning and identity in life. In his essay, “Uncertain circumstances, Undefined Individuals: A…

    • 2275 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plot of Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot is simple to relate. Two tramps are waiting by a sickly looking tree for the arrival of Mr. Godot. They quarrel, make up, contemplate suicide, try to sleep, eat a carrot and gnaw on some chicken bones. Two other characters appear, a master and a slave, who perform a grotesque scene in the middle of the play. A young boy arrives to say that Mr. Godot will not come today, but that he will come tomorrow. The play is a development of the title, Waiting for Godot. He does not come and the two tramps resume their vigil by the tree, which between the first and second day has sprouted a few leaves, the only symbol of a possible order in a thoroughly alienated world.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Waiting for Godot, Samuel Beckett produces a truly cryptic work. On first analyzing the play, one is not sure of what, if anything, happens or of the title character's significance. In attempting to unravel the themes of the play, interpreters have extracted a wide variety symbolism from the Godot's name. Some, taking an obvious hint, have proposed that Godot represents God and that the play is centered on religious symbolism. Others have taken the name as deriving from the French word for a boot, godillot. Still, others have suggested a connection between Godot and Godeau, a character who never appears in Honore de Balzac's Mercadet; Ou, le faiseur. Through all these efforts, there is still no definitive answer as to whom or what Godot represents, and the writer has denied that Godot represents a specific thing, despite a certain ambiguity in the name. Upon study, however, one realizes that this ambiguity in meaning is the exact meaning of Godot. Though he seems to create greater symbolism and significance in the name Godot, Beckett actually rejects the notion of truth in language through the insignificance of the title character's name. By creating a false impression of religious symbolism in the name Godot Beckett leads the interpreter to a dead end.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Existentialism is in essence a belief that the world we live in is fundamentally meaningless and absurd. Most Existentialists or Absurdists believe that each individual-not society or religion- is solely responsible for giving meaning to life and living it passionately and sincerely, or ‘authentically’. The ideas of Existentialism are discussed in not only Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex but also in Albert Camus’ The Outsider. Many aspects of both texts incorporate Existential beliefs and readings. Including the concepts that fate and chance affect our lives, that we can expect crime and punishment as part of our fate, and therefore a man cannot be fully content with his life until he dies, such is the unpredictability of life. Another Absurdist reading incorporated into both texts is that man constantly searches for the truth, and how we as an audience feel sympathy to the tragic hero of a text or play. It is in these ways that Sophocles’ play may be seen to represent some of the Existential or Absurdist ideas discussed during The Outsider, and convey and support some of these readings during both texts.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays