Preview

Exemptions to Section 499 IPC

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1556 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Exemptions to Section 499 IPC
Explain with suitable examples 'Exceptions for IPC Sec 499’

IC Sec 499 states that:

“ Defamation.-- Whoever by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter excepted, to defame that person.
Explanation 1.- It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a deceased person, if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or other near relatives.
Explanation 2.- It may amount to defamation to make an imputation concerning a company or an association or collection of persons as such.
Explanation 3.- An imputation in the form of an alternative or expressed ironically, may amount to defamation.
Explanation 4.- No imputation is said to harm a person' s reputation, unless that imputation directly or indirectly, in the estimation of others, lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person, or lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or of his calling, or lowers the credit of that person, or causes it to be believed that the body of that person is in a loathsome state, or in a state generally considered as disgraceful.”
Exceptions:
1) Imputation of truth in public interest for public good
2) Public conduct of public servants
3) Conduct of any person touching any public question
4) Publication of Reports of Proceedings or Courts
5) Merits of a case decided in court or conduct of witnesses and others
6) Merits of public performance
7) Censure passed in Good faith by person having lawful authority over another
8) Accusation preferred (made) in good faith to authorized person
9) Imputation made in good faith by person for protection of his or other’s interest
10) Caution intended for good

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (a) A writing that reflects an attorney's impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal research or theories is not discoverable under any…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Issue: The issue stands whether or not the phrase could reasonably be interpreted as a factual accusation about Yeagle, and thus would be considered defamation (Calhoun).…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Slander refers to making spoken statements known to be false that are malicious and tend to damage a person's reputation, and the courts have ruled that such spoken defamations are not protected by freedom of speech.…

    • 6147 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Study

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Tort was committed by WIRETIME, Inc. which means “a civil wrong where on party has acted, or in some cases failed to act, and that action or inaction causes a loss to be suffered by another party” (Melvin, S.P., 2011) The statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. will potentially harm Bugusa, Inc. reputation. A statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. accusing Bugusa, Inc. products were low quality and did not work past a months’ time. This type of statement is a defamatory “A false and defamatory…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Hillsborough Disaster

    • 3606 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Defamation law safeguards an individual’s rights against a defamatory statement that cause public contempt, hatred, or ridicule[1]. In Britain, the law of defamation is divided into two distinct sections; slander and libel. Slander is defamation in the transient form while libel is found in permanent from such as newspaper articles, online articles, or pictures. The law does not recognise the deceased as claimant even when represented by their relatives[2].…

    • 3606 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    what is crime

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    of a criminal case. If I slander somebody, I might be dragged into court, and I might have…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wiretime, Inc. has committed business competition tort or interference tort. Janet has a non-compete clause in her contract with BUGusa, Inc., which is valid for additional years. Janet’s contract with BUGusa, Inc. states that she is not to work for a competitor while she is still employed with them, is fired from the company, or resigns. Wiretime, Inc. could be liable for damages because they intentionally interfered with a valid contractual relationship between Janet and BUGusa, Inc. (Zuber, 2009). Janet can also be liable for breaking her contract.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bugusa Worksheet

    • 459 Words
    • 3 Pages

    was very particular to one organization, and it put a negative frame of mind to BUGusa’s…

    • 459 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Understanding Libel Quiz

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    4. The defendant isn’t required to prove anything. He has, however, a series of defenses available to him in a libel case.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction to Law

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is likely she could win a slander suit because the statement was false and it was printed with malice.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gng4170 Lecture Notes

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages

    o Defamation – An intentional tort. The reputation of the victim is damaged publicly by untrue statements made by the tort-feezer.…

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bsbwor501 Final Exam

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    8) In which of the following situations would the court likely be closed to the public or the press…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Flynt V Falwell Summary

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), ruled that a public figure may hold a speaker liable for the damage to reputation caused by publication of a defamatory falsehood, but only if the statement was made "with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not." This ad parody did not display actual malice, that is Hustler did not publish false facts in order to intentionally harm this man, also that no reasonable person could believe the facts of the ad to be true. Although the ad may have been distasteful and outrageous, according to the respondent, "Outrageousness" in the area of political and social discourse has an inherent subjectiveness about it which would allow a jury to impose liability on the basis of the jurors' tastes or views, or perhaps on the basis of their dislike of a particular expression. An "outrageousness" standard thus runs afoul of our longstanding refusal to allow damages to be awarded because the speech in question may have an adverse emotional impact on the audience. See NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886, 910 (1982) ("Speech does not lose its protected character . . . simply because it may embarrass others or coerce them into action"). Also, as stated in FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gm 520 Research Paper

    • 4631 Words
    • 19 Pages

    There are other types of intentional torts including: Defamation and slander that may pertain to publishing concerns or to information disseminated to the public about a business or an individual in an advertisement and, product disparagement is a serious tort involving the defamation of a company’s product. Innocent criticisms may be allowed, however when the disparagement causes loss of profits or ruins a company’s reputation, the harmed company can recover damages when the criticism has been committed with malice aforethought.…

    • 4631 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    -This example violates the Universal standards of Relevance and Significance. Why is the director of auxiliary services considered credible when speaking on the production of the school’s merchandise? Why is their opinion relevant? What significance does this fact have in the ultimate goal of changing the factory? To correct the problem the speaker should have gotten information from an administrator who purchases the merchandise from the textile factory, or omitted this entire statement.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays