Preview

Exclusion Clauses

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5243 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Exclusion Clauses
PRIVATE LAW DEPARTMENT

CLINICAL EXTERNSHIP REPORT

REPORT TITLE: RESTATEMENT OF THE DOCTRINE OF EXCLUSION CLAUSES IN CONTRACTS
NO. OF WORDS: 5,030 WORDS

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 ELEMENTS OF A CONTRACT 4 Offer 4 Acceptance 4 Intention to Legally Bind 4 Consideration 4 TERMS OF A CONTRACT 5 Collateral Contracts 6 Conditions or Warranties 6 EXCLUSION/EXEMPTION CLAUSES 7 Exclusive Remedies Clauses 9 JURISPRUDENCE ON EXCLUSION CLAUSE 10 Privity of Contract 14 RELEVANCE OF THE TOPIC TO THE EXTERNSHIP PROGRAM 14 KENYA PORTS AUTHORITY 15 CONCLUSION 19 BIBLIOGRAPHY 20 BOOKS 20 ARTICLES 20 STATUTES 20 INTERNET SOURCES 20

INTRODUCTION
The attitude of human being towards each other presupposes that “no man is an island”. This therefore necessitates a peaceful co-existence between the citizenry. The state is legally obliged to develop rules within which the interplay between collective private individual rights vise vie a particular right of an individual can be promoted, fulfilled, and protected. These are the basics of international obligations of a state within or without its territory. The pucta sunt servanda principle vetoes any excuse in non-fulfillment of the obligation. Through such rules people can enter into private arrangement through contracts or otherwise to fulfill their aspiration. A contract as a means to that end and not the end itself is a legally binding agreement between parties who create it in order to form a relation enforceable by law.
Such agreements are drafted in cases of employment, purchase goods, machinery or the provision of services, for an agreed consideration (price/value). They can be in written form or verbal, and in some cases and often enough in both. However, where a contract is formally written and signed, it is assumed that whatever is stipulated as the terms is final regardless of what was verbally agreed. This is the parole evidence rule but just like any other legal



Bibliography: BOOKS R.G Lawson, ‘Exclusion Clauses & Unfair Contract Terms’ (2005); Thomson & Maxwell ARTICLES The Kenya Gazette (Kenya, Nairobi) 30 December, 1999 Sales of Goods Act, Cap 31 of 2003 (2012 Revised Edition), Laws of Kenya, Sections 16 and 55 Kenya Ports Authority Act, cap 391 of 1978, Laws of Kenya, Section 62(1) INTERNET SOURCES http://www.kenyaportsauthority.com (accessed 5th April, 2013) http://www.kenyalawreports.org (accessed 5th April, 2013) http://businessdictionary.com (accessed 12th April, 2013) http:// www.northwaleslawsociety.com (accessed 18 April, 2013) -------------------------------------------- [ 1 ]. Curtis v Chemical Cleaning Co (1951)1 KB 805 [ 2 ] [ 3 ]. 1964, AC 446 [ 4 ] [ 5 ]. Astrazeneca UK Ltd vs. Albemarle International Corporation & Another (2011) EWHC 1574 [ 6 ] [ 10 ]. Chatricha vs. Pumchand & Sons (1959) EA 746 [ 11 ] [ 12 ]. 1949, 1 KB 532 [ 13 ] [ 14 ]. 1972, AB 71 [ 15 ] [ 16 ]. (1983) 1 ALL ER [ 17 ] [ 22 ]. 1956,1 WLR 936 [ 23 ] [ 26 ]. 2012, eKLR [ 27 ]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Medicines Company

    • 868 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Medicines Company Case Write-Up: Terence Cho, Felipe Duarte, Aleks Loiko, Robert Shaw, and James Wang…

    • 868 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter Four – The Exclusionary Rule Vicente Farias Jose Martinez The Exclusionary Rule  The Exclusionary Rule – Evidence obtained in violation of Fourth Amendment cannot be used at trial – The primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct – What other purpose does the exclusionary rule have? The Exclusionary Rule …

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exclusionary rule prohibits illegally obtained evidence from being used in a criminal trial (Hall, 2015). Furthermore, the exclusionary rule applies to prevent unconstitutionally obtained evidentiary submissions, and the rule is applicable to items or confessions (Hall, 2015). After reviewing the exclusionary rule I feel it should be applied to illegal arrests too, unless the police obtain sufficient evidence independent of the illegal arrest. In the case of State v. Eserjose police made an illegal arrest of the defendant for second-degree burglary; however, during an interview the Mr. Eserjose was read his Miranda rights, and he chose to waive his rights, ultimately confessing to the burglary (Ma, 2013). Subsequently, Mr. Eserjose’s…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am usually one of those people that believes in the law and that believes that rules are in place for a reason. I am well aware of the Exclusionary Rule and the Poisonous Fruit Doctrine however, these are two things that I don't believe in. According to the Exclusionary Rule, any evidence obtained without a warrant or Constitutional justification needs to be excluded from any case records. (FindLaw, 2017). While the Poisonous Fruit Doctrine indicates that the court may exclude not only the evidence itself that was seized in violation of the Constitution but also any other evidence that was derived from the illegal search. (FindLaw, 2017). This doctrine allows for many criminals to be set free on a technicality. We are all well aware that…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The exclusionary rule is intended to reject prove acquired disregarding a criminal litigant's Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment ensures against irrational quests and seizures by law requirement work force. On the off chance that the hunt of a criminal suspect is preposterous, the proof acquired in the pursuit will be rejected from trial.The exclusionary administer is a court-made run the show. This implies it was made not in statutes go by authoritative bodies but instead by the U.S. Incomparable Court. The exclusionary control applies in government courts by goodness of the Fourth Amendment. The Court has decided that it applies in state courts in spite of the fact that the due procedure condition of the Fourteenth Amendment.(The Bill of Rights—the…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I find that the evidence would still be valid based on the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule. The good faith exception states “that If officers had a reasonable, good-faith belief that they were acting per legal authority, such as by relying on a search warrant that is later found to have been legally defective, the illegally seized evidence is admissible” (Busby, 2009). The good faith exception was established by a 6-3 U.S Supreme court decision in the United States v. Leon 468 U.S. 897 (1984). The majority opinion, as written by Bryon R. White, was that the exclusionary rule was established to deter law enforcements violations of the 4th amendment warranting against illegal search and seizure. Therefore “reliable physical evidence seized by officers reasonably relying on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate” did not violate the exclusionary rule and the evidence was to be admitted (Kaye, 2011). The good faith exception was reviewed and expanded in Arizona v. Evans 514 U.S. 1 (1995), a case that I feel directly correlates to my decision reference the admissibility of the evidence in the example given. In Arizona v. Evans an officer conducts a legal traffic stop. Upon running the driver’s license the officer discovers an outstanding warrant for arrest. Pursuant to the arrest a search was conduct and marijuana discovered. When charging Evan’s when possession the officers discovered that the warrant had been quashed. In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that this was not a violation of Evan’s 4th Amendment rights since the evidence, though obtained based on an illegal warrant, was legal based on the good faith…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Analysis

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages

    They seem to believe the exclusionary rule is no longer necessary due to the high degree of police professionalism. AELE believe police violations are unintentional and because of their high degree of professionalism they act in "Good Faith". Therefore petty mistakes allow evidence to be excluded and free criminals.…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that “[t]he right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (U.S. Const. amend. IV). When the Fourth Amendment rights of citizens are violated, the criminal justice system enforces the exclusionary rule, which seeks to discourage law enforcement officers from using improper or illegal investigative procedures. In Mapp v. Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that the exclusionary rule was…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When law enforcement or an government agency take it upon themselves to enter someone home or search a vehicle without a valid search warrant they are violating that persons Fourth Amendment rights against unlawful search and seizure. Evidence that could be admissible in a case may be excluded from trial if it is gather as a resulted from an illegal search or some other constitutional violation. The exclusionary rule prevents the use of most evidence gathered illegally. The rule can also be triggered by law enforcement violations of a person’s Fifth or Sixth Amendments right as well. I feel that is the case as it contains to John Smith and the search of his…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This exception allows the Government to offer illegally-seized evidence on cross-examination of the defendant to impeach the defendant after the defendant takes the stand and perjures himself. It should be noted that the exception applies only to the testimony of the defendant, and not to any other…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Evidence obtained by a police officer in reasonable reliance on a search warrant that is subsequently found invalid may be admissible. United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984). It is necessary that a reasonably well-trained officer would have believed that the warrant was valid. This has come to be known as the “good faith” or Leon exception to the exclusionary rule. Many states, however, have rejected this exception.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In a landmark supreme court case, called the united states versus weeks, the supreme courts created a rule to our criminal procedure called the exclusionary rule. What the exclusionary rule means is that if the police obtain evidence against you in violation of your constitutional rights, they cannot use that evidence against you to prove your guilt or innocence at a trial. An example of this would be police searching your home without a search warrant. If they found illegal item in your home during that search, they could not be used against you at trial. Now the important thing to remember about the exclusionary rule, however, is that it does not mean you are automatically free to go. It only means that that particular piece of evidence is…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 326 Words
    • 1 Page

    Deterrence rationale is “the rationale for the exclusionary rule that rests upon the view that, to deter officers from disregarding the constitution, it is necessary to exclude from evidence at trail the evidentiary fruits of illegal police conduct.” (Garland, 2011,p.265) When it comes the applications for the exclusionary rule, “judges are not allowed to be accomplices to illegality by allowing the introduction of illegally obtained evidence.” (Garland, 2011,p.265) The courts have established what is called the “good faith exception” and this is where it was believed that the officers had probable cause to get a warrant.…

    • 326 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fourth amendment guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, along with requiring any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause. The interpretation and execution of the Fourth amendment in the courtroom however, is decided by the Supreme Court in an attempt to find a fair balance between individual and community interests. The exclusionary rule for example, is a Supreme Court precedent that holds police departments responsible for seizing incriminating information according to constitutional specifications of due process, or the information will not be allowed as evidence in a criminal trial. The question that arises in turn, is whether the exclusionary rule has handcuffed the abilities to effectively protect the community by the police, or if it has actually resulted in a positive police reform which needs to be expanded upon.…

    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Customary Law Introduction

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The international community was built on centuries of traditions, actions and lessons learned. These actions of history were recorded and eventually created into law. This beginning of human action is beginning of custom and customary law that have been codified through acceptance into national and state behavior. Customary law has been usually agreed to as a “general practice, accepted by law.” Treaties that have dated back to around 3000 B.C.E., created customs still used today. One, a realist approach states that States are sovereign and must consent to treaties, and even with treaties can act independently from it. And the custom of pacta sunt servanda, states that countries that have agreed to the treaties are bound to carry out, in good faith the responsibilities in which they have agreed to (Scott 2010, 5). People create customs in history; therefore they are a form of positivism, in which people make the law. Since customs are made by human actions, they are laws made by people that require a longer time to codify (Scott 2010, 78).…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics