Necessity
There are times when a person believes there is an imminent danger and they must take …show more content…
If other solutions were available, yet the defendant chose not to use them, this defense will not be successful. The method of least harm must always be used first.
The imminent threat must not be a result of the actions of the defendant.
An Example Of The Necessity Defense
A forest is burning and an individual realizes it will spread if action is not taken quickly. In order to prevent the fire from reaching the city, the defendant burns down houses on the edge of the forest, believing this will take away fuel for the fire. In this situation, as long as the individual burning the houses didn't start the forest fire, the necessity defense may be used. It is ultimately up to the court and a jury of the defendant's peers to determine guilt or innocence.
Exceptions To The Necessity Defense
Economic necessity, in most cases, cannot be used as part of a necessity defense. In addition, prisoners typically cannot use the necessity defense upon escape from confinement, although some courts do allow this matter to be addressed in court. If the necessity defense is used in any way in these situations, the prisoner must show that he or she turned themselves in to the appropriate authorities once they were no longer in …show more content…
They will only use this defense, however, when the above conditions are met. Defendants need to understand this when working with their legal team.
Duress
When a person is forced to partake in criminal activity by another individual, the duress defense may be used. Similar in many ways to the necessity defense, the duress defense differs in that the actions taken were the result of threats by an individual, as opposed to threats posed by nature and its physical forces. As with the necessity defense, certain requirements must be met before this defense may be used. A defendant should always consult with an Ann Arbor defense attorey to determine if these requirements are met before proceeding.
The defendant must have received an actual threat. The belief that a threat was pending is not enough for this type of defense.
The threat must involve bodily harm or death. In the past, according to common law, the threat needed to be of serious bodily harm or death, but today's laws allow for lesser bodily harm to be enough when using this