Preview

Examples Of Police Interrogation Techniques

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
417 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Police Interrogation Techniques
Know About 3 Interrogation Techniques That Could Be Used On You By The Police

When you are being held due to suspicion of a crime, it’s very possible that you will be interrogated by the police. Their goal will be to get information out of you about the crime, or even have you confess to it. While you have the right to remain silent until your attorney arrives, it is good to know some possible interrogation techniques that the police could use on you.

Lying To You

One misconception about the police is that they must tell you the truth in all situations. This is not true at all. Police officers are allowed to lie to mislead you if they are trying to get you to confess. For example, they may tell you that they have turned off the security camera in an attempt to get the real story, when it is actually recording the entire time. They may tell you that you’ll get a less serious charge for confessing, but they do not have the power to charge you with a crime. The only person that can do that will be the prosecutor. …show more content…
They could help file a court motion to have anything you said during an interrogation thrown out of court.

Isolate You

Another common police interrogation technique is to use isolation. At first it may not seem so bad, since they’ll just leave you isolated in the interrogation room. After many hours of this, the hope is that you’ll be ready to confess to the crime so that you can leave

If your lawyer is coming, just you need to realize you have to be patient. The isolation will end, and your lawyer will be able to get you out of the interrogation room. Show
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Brief in Irac Format
    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Brief in Irac Format

    In order for an admission to be admissible in court, prior to interrogation, the individual must first be informed in clear and unequivocal terms that he has the right to remain silent. In addition, the warning to remain silent must be accompanied by the explanation that anything can be used against the individual in court, and that the individual has the right to have an attorney present during interrogation, and if they can not afford one, then one will be appointed to them. Also, if the individual waives his right to remain silent and for counsel to be present, the police must show that the waiver was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary: Psychological Behavior In Interrogation
    • 43 Words
    • 1 Page

    Summary: Psychological Behavior In Interrogation

    Law enforcement agencies have strategies such as psychological behavior and cognitive behavior in interrogation. Interrogation is a guilt presumptive process focusing mainly on extracting information from suspects. In criminal court they want to collect admissible evidence and charge the defendant with that crime.…

    • 43 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study
    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study

    Being cautious and prepared is key for interrogating suspects. The interrogation location should be free from distractions or interruptions. The interrogation room should be well lit and secure. It's important that the officer not ask close ended questions. Asking closed ended questions will lead to short yes or no responses. Asking open ended questions will lead to a broader response and more information will likely come out. Taking notes and recording the interrogation is also key. Although there are many types of interrogation techniques, the officers should discuss the role they will be playing before hand. They can decide which type of interrogation technique will bring out the best results. -WRITTEN AND INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION-METHODS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT By Harvey Wallace and Cliff Roberson(CHAPTER 9 PAGES 139-145)…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Unite Prison Experiment: Questions And Answers
    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Unite Prison Experiment: Questions And Answers

    1) What police procedures are used during arrests, and how do these procedures lead people to feel confused, fearful, and dehumanized?…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    My Supreme Court Case: Miranda V. Arizona
    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    My Supreme Court Case: Miranda V. Arizona

    By custodial interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.” The Court also held that “without proper safeguards, the process of in-custody interrogation of persons suspected or accused of crime contains inherently compelling pressures which work to undermine the individual’s will to resist and to compel him to speak where he would otherwise do so freely.” Therefore, a defendant “must be warned prior to any questioning that he has the right to remain silent, that anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, that he has the right to the presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning if he so desires.” As those reasons, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Supreme Court of Arizona in Miranda, reversed the judgment of the New York Court of Appeals in Vignera, reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Westover, and affirmed the judgment of the Supreme Court of California in Stewart.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jeffery Deskovic's False Confession
    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jeffery Deskovic's False Confession

    This further illustrates that police officers can use multiple tactics other than simple questioning such as deception, a list of narratives, and open-ended questions. Suspects might admit that committing the crime for multiple reasons including mental illness, desire for attention, and to protect loved ones. Corroborated and nonpublic facts are based on police not disclosing facts to the public and how the confessions can be contaminated through the police or expert evidence can all lead to false confessions (Garrett,…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Police Body Cameras
    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Police Body Cameras

    The first instinct of humans when they are in a mode of panic is to get out of the situation at any means necessary. Even if this means they have to lie their way out of the situation. With the police body cameras present this eliminates the possibility of the person lying their way out. They are forced to tell the truth.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Coerced Confessions: Garrity V. New Jersey
    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Coerced Confessions: Garrity V. New Jersey

    The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution forbids the use of coerced confessions in criminal proceedings (Peak et at, 2010). However, internal investigations are a different matter. The U.S Supreme Court case of Garrity v. New Jersey defined what must be done. The case got its start when officers under investigation for fixing citations were ordered to give statements or be fired (Roufa, 2014). The statements were then used to convict the officers and they appealed saying that their statements were coerced with the threat of being fired (Roufa, 2014). The court agreed and what arose from the case was the Garrity rule which states “that if an officer is compelled to provide self-incriminating information or statements, such statements…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona
    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    If a criminal remains silent throughout the interrogation , the interrogation must stop and a the criminal asks for an attorney , the interrogation must stop until the attorney…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    False Confessions: The Raid Interrogation Method
    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages

    False Confessions: The Raid Interrogation Method

    Majority of interrogators follow the Raid Interrogation method due to its high effectiveness. The Raid Interrogation procedure involves isolating the suspect into a confined room, confirming that there is no doubt in his or her guilt, preventing the suspect defending his or her accusation, lying about evidence that proves their crime, giving the suspect reasons on why he or she committed the crime, repeating the steps until they agree with you and having them provide the details about the crime (Jackman Para. 8). James L. Trainum is a former detective who spent 17 years in homicide and dealt with interrogations around it (Jackman Para. 3). He didn’t recognize the flaw in the interrogation method until he realized an imprisoned woman that he previously interrogated was exonerated through DNA examinations.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Relationship Between Interrogation And False Confessions
    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Relationship Between Interrogation And False Confessions

    There are three issues focus in this article: the manner in which false confession generated, change in susceptibility to interrogative influence, and how false confession lead the wrongful conviction of innocents. In the Norfolk Four case, police pressured the innocent suspects and generate four false confessions. Using the case of the Norfolk Four, the author claims the seven psychological processes that are often involved from false confessions to wrongful conviction. The psychological behavior has affected the confessor and others thinking and actions involved to produce a wrongful…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Police Interrogation Case Study
    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Police Interrogation Case Study

    In a recent Supreme Court ruling from the case of J.D.B. v. North Carolina established age is a factor that must be considered during a police interrogation (Mears, 2011). Furthermore, J.D.B. was a thirteen-year-old special needs student, and a burglary suspect, who was questioned by the police at school. Additionally, J.D.B. was not provided Miranda warnings before the police began interrogation (Mears, 2011). The Supreme Court determined that a child in placed in the situation would feel compelled to answer police questions, whereas an adult would feel free to leave (Mears, 2011). Since we possess a general background of the case let us further examine some additional key facts and issues beginning with was interrogation considered custodial.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of The Reid Technique
    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Analysis Of The Reid Technique

    The Reid technique is a commonly used police interrogation technique in North America (King & Snook, 2009). This interrogation technique is used to elicit confessions from people suspected of committing a criminal offense. The Reid technique requires that police officers collect factual evidence, then the interviewer questions the suspect in a non-accusatory manner (King & Snook, 2009). Truth or deception is then determined based on behavioural analysis of the suspect, then if deception is detected a 9-step psychological approach from the Reid technique is applied (King & Snook, 2009). However, interrogators often apply this technique as the first step without any physical evidence, where they coerce their suspect to incriminate themselves…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Torture Vs Torture
    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Torture Vs Torture

    And while this is manipulation, it is usually a much safer technique than brutally beating the person of interest. This is kind of technique, called a sting operation, is used to catch a suspect committing or confessing to a crime. The most popular technique in undercover work is called the “Mr. Big Technique”. Though there are different procedures based on the agency, there are consistent themes. To begin the operation, the suspect “is befriended by an undercover police operative who may ‘meet’ the suspect while in custody or at a place of employment” (Smith, Stinson, Patry). After the meeting, the operative spends a lot of time with the suspect, slowly building a friendship and earning trust. Then the undercover policeman introduces the suspect to a gang (undercover policemen) where they all perform basic tasks: counting money or looking-out for cops. In return, the suspect earns large amounts of money (up to several thousand per week). Later, the operative updates the suspect on their gang being promoted within the organization, “but a condition of that promotion is a meeting with the Big Boss, or ‘Mr. Big’” (Smith, Stinson, Patry). The condition: the suspect must confess to a crime. Theoretically, it provides the organization with information to use as a blackmailing evidence if necessary. Occasionally, the suspect is told that whatever the crime he confessed to will be “taken care of”, or the evidence will be destroyed so the police will never discover the truth. So in order to secure the promotion, the suspect must confess to the crime, which is stealthily recorded by the police. There was one case where once the suspect confessed to his crime, another gang member confessed to his own crime. Yes, there are flaws in this technique, such as false confessions that can taint evidence, but it is the much safer route than torture. Even the Royal Mounted Canadian Police agrees that this is a method they will continue to…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Fifth Amendment
    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fifth Amendment

    Miranda Rights are you have the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law, you have the right to an attorney, if you cannot afford one, one will be appointed to you. Basically it states that you do not have to talk if you feel like you are going to incriminate yourself during an interrogation. Also you have the right to a lawyer and if you cannot afford one, one will be given to you. You can plead the fifth which is to refuse to answer any question because the response could form self incriminating evidence.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics