Preview

Examples Of Panem In Ancient Rome

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
475 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Panem In Ancient Rome
Ancient Rome is closer to an ideal society than Panem is because Rome provided basic human needs, including happiness, free of charge, to its citizens even though they didn’t have to. Ancient Rome lasted for hundreds of years and spanned three continents. It had an organized social structure, in and outside the city of Rome. There were many eras of peace and prosperity and they had beautiful architecture and substantial engineering, as seen throughout Rome, Italy, and most of Europe. Emperors built magnificent markets, public baths, and the roads and aqueducts that gave citizens access to clean water and connected the vast empire. Aelius Aristides, a greek orator who gave a speech in Rome on the Pax Romana, said “Vast as it is, your empire …show more content…
Neither of these societies is absolutely ideal but Panem is not ideal because they force all the citizens to work hard and long hours for little or no pay. The Capitol takes the goods the districts produce and uses them in the Capitol for their own purposes and doesn’t give anything back to the districts. There are restrictions on communication, trade, and travel. They take children from the districts and force them to kill each other in a manipulated arena for the Capitols’ entertainment. Rome is closer to the ideal society because they didn’t go to the extent of brutality that Panem did. They did have battles to the death, but the Gladiators were trained and any citizen had the option whether or not they wanted to go to Colosseum to see the games. Rome built roads to ease travel and communication across their empire for the benefit of travelers everywhere. They built aqueducts that gave their people clean water and bathhouses for bathing and cleanliness. The ideal (and impossible) society would be where everyone was equal and fair. Anyone and everyone would have access to clean water, electricity, food, education, work that they liked, communication, and knowledge. Ancient Rome came closer to that ideal society than

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Western Civ Essay Exam

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1) Augustus was a key factor in bringing stability to Rome. Augustus was the first emperor and ruled from 31BC-14AD. Augustus intends to restore the Republic form of Government. He forms the New Order, which gives him full power and he rules as consul until 23BC. He is popular among the people because he brings peace after 60 years of war. He does this by reorganizing the army, which causes social stability, and he makes it so non-Romans can earn citizenship if they are a good fighter. He also creates the Praetorian, which are 9,000 of the best soldiers who act as the emperors body guards. Also, he reduces the number of members in the senate. He allows equestrians to become patricians, which causes social mobility. He throws parades and celebrations where the plebs can get free food. Augustus believes social moral has declined mainly in the rich and limits their extreme parties. He believes religion can cure so he builds many temples. He pioneers domes and arches. One famous temple is called the Pantheon, which is a temple for all Gods. The Cult of the State is formed and temples are built to worship Rome and Augustus’s spirit. Augustus makes adultery and crime and banishes his daughter after she cheats. He encourages marriage by heavily taxing single people. He leaves the Julio-Claudian legacy and his family rules for almost 100years. Augustus was the first good emperor in the Pax Romana. After Augustus dies, Rome’s stability ends and Tiberius takes over.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    WHY ROME WAS SO GREAT Many have wondered, why was The Roman Empire so great. Rome was so great because it's the first village that grew into an empire, entertained every one with a vast variety of entertainment, a functional law system, and several advances in technology.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP world history

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome: “republic” based on citizenship of free men; citizenship ensured loyalty to the state and brought taxes into the state treasury; emperor-dictators had to support the idea of the republic and pretend to follow what the Senate, council of elder wealthy men, decreed. Development of bureaucracy helped run empire.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar Dbq

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Seeing as Rome had a new Democratic government, not one individual could rule. However, they still had votes on who to elect for government and for the contestants it was big competition. According to Document A “Life of Caesar” by Plutarch, even the competition for smaller, miserable-looking communities was tough. This is because there is always “jealous…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ancient Romans had a better system in regards to government and citizenship than the Athenians. Unlike the Athenians, the Romans allowed people living in conquered lands to become citizens with limited rights. Native-born Roman women and children were considered citizens while in Athens, only free, native-born adult males are citizens. The Romans also had a better-organized government system.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that the Roman Empire was good at providing public services so I gave them a -A.One of the Romans best services was the roads.The roads were…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Rome Fell Essay

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To begin, when Rome was going through the tough times the had twenty-two emperiors in just fifty years. With this ineffecrive and inconsistant leadership Rome had stopped growing and evolving into what is could have become. The people had, instead of working with the leader to figure things out, ddecide that assaination was the way to go, aside from that the people also had a rough time choosing their leader. This shows how disrespectful and inconsiderate some of the people in Rome really were, which is my second point. Lastly, the population which at on point seemed as though it would never stop grow, in fact did. Because of this there was less tax money coing in then what was needed and it led to an increase in prices for everything else. Due to all of these problems with the government Rome was being distroyed from the inside out, but is that the only reason…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did Rome Become Good?

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This resulted in a hybrid system, where if you consider the livelihood of the state, and the happiness of its citizens to be the benchmark of what is good, than Rome would be the best state. Polybius considered it the best state because “the strength which is developed by the State is so extraordinary, that everything required is unfailingly carried out by the eager rivalry shown by all classes to devote their whole minds to the need of the hour, and to secure that any determination come to should not fail for want of promptitude;” (Polybius, 1889) The qualities that he describes as good, come down to the drive and confidence of the Roman citizens. As a result of drive and confidence you get successful men that achieve happiness through the acquisition of material wealth. To the Roman man, they strive all their life to achieve happiness which commonly comes through material wealth. This is somewhat common to Athens, but nowhere near the same qualities as Sparta. Although there are differences between the Roman idea of success and the Athenians’. The Athenians, although they used money would not judge each other on the basis of monetary wealth. So in the Athenians eye, the Romans were more likely to get corrupted by monetary wealth. On the contrast because of the government infrastructure, in Rome the state was less likely to get corrupted by sophists, whereas…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The seating and thoughts on the entertainment of Roman gladiators is similar to the audience experience of the Hunger Games. The Capitol watched the Hunger Games happily while people in the Districts watched painfully as young people from their district died. The Capitol watched the Hunger Games from their homes, seated and in plazas, which was much more luxurious than the Districts sitting in their homes and outside on outdated televisions and the projector. Much like the seating at the Colosseum, the Districts did not have the privilege of comfortable seating compared to the people in the Capitol. The audience experience of Roman gladiators and the Hunger Games were similar because the admission fee for both was free. This was because the leaders wanted to control the people watching the gladiatorial…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During his adolescence while these events were unfolding, it was rumoured and publicly known throughout Rome that Caligula adored his sister Drusilla, maybe a little too much. One source stated that “He caught in incest with his sister Drusilla while still in his teens.” This was not considered normal or righteous in Roman custom during Caligula’s age. However, during Tiberius’s reign as Emperor, his way of life and ruling would have influenced and changed Caligula’s view on how to rule as an Emperor. When Caligula was living with Tiberius at his Court in Capri, he was getting old and needed to find a successor and the only option was Caligula. However, the world Caligula endured at Capri, would have been nothing for which he would have seen,…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Ancient Rome, patricians were known to be the ruling class of the society, while plebians were the peasants or commoners without opportunities to move upward on the social ladder. The lack of social mobility in Ancient Rome poses a comparison against modern time United States. One of the very core foundations of the U.S. is that citizens are encouraged to pursue the American dream. People still hold true the promise of the better life by achieving education attainment…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome is also politically similar to America due to the enormous cost of political elections. In Rome, only the wealthiest people were able…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman society allowed people to live their own lives to their preference without the worry of breaking the law or being thrown out of society. At the same time, they also consisted of an organized Roman Senate that was already inherited making their decisions consistent, but at the same time the citizens were allowed to express opinions through a voting system. Social standings allowed citizens to build up from poverty and become wealthy, rather than not having the freedom of being as powerful as you can. Overall, the Roman system is better than the Athenian system when it comes to citizenship, republican system, and social standings because Roman citizens were provided with more freedom and had fewer…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The golden ages of Rome and Athens, a period of important benchmarks for the system of citizenship in history. Athens in 430 B.C. went into the golden age, while Rome went to the golden age in 130 B.C., citizenship was honored in both societies, but what makes a citizenship system considered good? A well-constructed citizenship system should contain the best offer to foreigners, citizens participation in government, and organization of citizens in social class, which Rome comes superior in.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World Empires

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Between 200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E. The Roman Empire ruled with an iron fist controlling mostly and if not all of the Mediterranean. This was due to two main factors, these are it military power and the political system it was able to develop. However most of the Romans accomplishment didn’t happen as an empire, but a republic. While as a republic, Romans created a political system that heavily influenced many to move to the Rome. In the article Ways of the World by Robert W. Strayer he states that the political system created “a written code of law offered plebeians (the poor class) some protection from abuse” from the upper or elite classes. Also this provided a better “system of public assemblies [that] provided an opportunity for lower classes to shape public policy and a new office of tribune” that would represent them in these assemblies. This was a huge part of Rome popularity and its growing number. This was the first time were the poorer classes had any kind of support from a political system. The Romans had get deal of pride with their newly developed system that benefited everyone. They also believed that the political system gave them a “greater freedom than did many of their more autocratic neighbors.”…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays