Both are hoping for change, hoping that their voices either wrong or right will be heard in the end. The highly non-peaceful resistance includes constant non-cooperation, civil disobedience, breaking the law, and sometimes or most of the times ends in some form of violence, destruction, and even death. Shattering store front windows, flipping over cars, throwing stones at the other party, burning our flag, and sadly even killing police …show more content…
Non-peaceful resistance certainly seems to get noticed more or the social media seems to broadcast or post it more. I believe that has a lot to do with it, if it was less sensationalized maybe so many unruly people would not be so quick to jump on board a non-peaceful resistant event. Peaceful resistance to our laws, nation, communities, or leaders can have a positive impact on a free society. I believe that peaceful resistance tries to do just that, bring peace to a situation or issue. Peaceful resistance is trying to start a peaceful dialog, open up the lines of communication, expressing ones concerns for certain situations without violence, unruliness, destruction and without chaos. You can peacefully have a plat form from which to share your views and feel like your voice is being heard, your onion does matter, and peacefully you can strive to instill change, to instill justice, to instill values and morals. There have been numerous highly outspoken civil rights leaders that have demonstrated time and time again monumental peaceful resistance all without themselves ever being violent. Rosa Parks, Eleanor Roosevelt, Martin Luther King Jr., and Cesar Chavez just to