Preview

Examples Of Cloning In Frankenstein

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
264 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Cloning In Frankenstein
Can Cloning Lead to a Modern Frankenstein?

In the story, after creating the monster, Victor creates an ethical dilemma. This brings about the question, could this happen in real life? With cloning, it can. Examples in Frankenstein can compare to cloning and prove that a modern Frankenstein can exist. One quote is: ““When I found so astonishing a power placed within my hands, I hesitated a long time concerning the manner in which I should employ it” (Shelley 51). Frankenstein contemplated the idea of how the creation of life could be used in society. Similarly, cloning at first was contemplated to consider where it could be used: in the sciences, to clone soldiers, or to be sold to the public. When cloning came out in the national

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein presents that Victor’s creation is a monster and that is not true. The true monster in this story is Dr. Victor Frankenstein. Victor had one goal in creating his creature and that was to gain fame and to gain praise from his creation. The one difference that separates Victor and the Creature apart is that Victor thought that the creature was still evil in the end, but the creature realized that what he had done was…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    expect a human being to react in one way and a machine or construct in another .…

    • 2936 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein has been written and rewritten, imaged and re-imaged many times in both movies and books. The countless versions deal with the events in various ways and have different endings, although most of the modifications were minor and didn’t change the story line too much. In Paul McGuigan’s 2015 movie version of “Victor Frankenstein”, we see a more updated version with dynamic and thrilling turns, also showing just a portion of Victor’s life starting from adulthood. It shows events that led up to the creation of the monster, through the eyes of Igor, with their friendship being the focus of the film. The true monster of the Frankenstein story is Victor the scientist because he refuses to show compassion. When humans refuse to be compassionate,…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein never learns to mature, and can barely see the immorality of his experiments. His childish outlook on the entire situation between him and his creation emphasizes that he is controlled by his “Id”. He lacks acceptance of his creation’s appearance suggesting that despite his use of dead body parts, Victor imagined his creation to be beautiful as he imagines himself to be beautiful. However, if Victor used logical reasoning he would understand the reality of his creation would be as horrifying and deformed as the idea of reanimating a dead body. Victor clearly cannot take the weight of his creation, “unable to endure the aspect of the being [he] had created, [he] rushed out of the room.” (43)…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley presents a powerful depiction of monstrous nature that is perceived to us through the use of: nature, context, contrast, perception, imagery and language in the novel. Through these devices and means, a bleak outlook of humanity as a whole is portrayed.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If you create something should you be able to kill it? The notion of playing god like Victor did with the creatures in Frankenstein is comparative to the same issue the courts have with abortion laws. Various angles of abortion can be quite overwhelming as well as who makes the final decision. Many governments have struggled to strike what they believe to be a balance between the rights of pregnant women and the rights of fetuses. Before life is started, generally, an individual has thought about whether or not they want to create life. All life is created whether it is the creatures in Frankenstein or development of a fetus. Once life has been created choosing to end that life can cause many issues. The struggle of choosing between life and death could be avoided by an individual evaluating the results of creating a life before starting the process.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein and the monster that he creates are very similar. Frankenstein being a great man had his wants and needs even though he studied things that people thought to be ungodly and just wrong. Frankenstein creates the monster to be like himself although the monster has super human strength and is almost eight feet tall. Victor worked very hard trying to create the monster not noticing that he was creating the monster in his image.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychologists have long debated the nature versus nurture issue in the shaping of our identities. Are we shaped by our biology or by our environment? This psychological debate is explored in Mary Shelly’s gothic novel, Frankenstein. The novel poses a simple question: Was Frankenstein’s monster inherently an evil creature, or was he made into a killer because of his environment? Shelly’s characterization of Frankenstein’s monster shows that the creature began as a clean slate, but was shaped into a monster by his experiences and isolation.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cruelty towards any being is often seen as immoral. Cruelty towards people who are exiled from society is common. The two situations show who society deems a “being.” The concept that harm to others is often used in literature as a connecting theme or the motivation for characters. It can cause action and plot development throughout the story, and an example would be Frankenstein. Often, hatred or revenge is the main factor for the bullying or the victim lashing out. Cruelty can come with many possibilities and it all depends on the character’s personality on how they react.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think Victor shouldn’t create the monster for Frankenstein. I think he made the correct choice because; Frankenstein may not keep his promises. Also she may not agree with the promises. She could also reject him, and he could go crazy. Perhaps she could be stronger and be more destructive than Frankenstein. There is also a chance that Frankenstein may not like her back and feel a connection. Victor can get in big trouble if he creates the monster for Frankenstein.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is exactly what happens to Victor when he becomes so focused on making the creature rather than being in the real world. He also explains that “this crisis” of technology taking over our lives “leads to a general realization about our technology: that it is us” (Vargish). He argues that humans are at fault for the huge technological advances going on today and that it has gone too far, due to the drive to discover. He also argues that it represents our true aspirations in life. For instance, Vargish shows how Victor abuses technology for his own personal gain as he argues that “he plans to employ his new technology to create a race of dependents who will worship and praise him” (Vargish). This shows that Victor uses technology for what he is truly after-worship and praise. Vargish argues that Victor is more concerned about his pride than making the creature. This behavior is much better represented by the creature rather than Victor, which demonstrates how crossing the line with technology and especially for the sake of pride can lead to big consequences. Due to Victor’s pride, the creature that he regrets creating in the first place, becomes an attention seeking monster reflecting who Victor really is, or as Vargish stated “Frankenstein's monster is Frankenstein; the creation expresses the creator”…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By this definition, in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein both Victor and his creation can be perceived as monsters. Both characters breach socially established boundaries with the creature blurring the lines between life and death as well as humanity and bestiality through his combined circumstances of birth and outward appearance. Frankenstein’s creation is not of human origin, but rather exists as an amalgamation of corpses created through scientific experimentation, “a product of nature – his ingredients are 100 per cent natural – and yet by the process and the very fact of his creation, he is unnatural”. Admittedly, Frankenstein’s creation fits the definition of the archetypal monster as “a large, ugly, and frightening imaginary creature” however, this is only true in regards to his aesthetical appearance for he is shown throughout the novel to exhibit the essence of humanity through his morality, intelligence and emotional capacity. In fact…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Frankenstein, the role of the monster and human are subtly revered with Victor considered more monstrous than the creature he created. This is because first, Victor is portrayed monstrous than the creature because he abandons his creature instead of educating and friendly introducing him to the world, which is itself a monstrous act of irresponsibility. Secondly, Victor ought to know that the creature will likely harm others, but due to his selfishness he places his family and friends at great risk. Some might say that Victor is not monstrous and disagree with the fact that he only wants creature to be killed, because he agreed to the creature that he will make the female form of the creature to fulfill the creature’s need and for his family’s…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He ends up getting in Victor’s mind until he ultimately dies. He spent the rest of his life trying to get away from the monster and then trying to track it with clues. There are some similarities and differences between the monster and Victor Frankenstein. The similarities are that they both possess physical power. Victor has the ability to put a life together by putting body parts back together and has power over science. Likewise, the monster has the physical capability to have ability over life in the fact that he can kill. The difference is that Victor is bringing life back and the monster is killing. Another difference shows that Victor realized he had power and felt guilty and the monster has never felt any remorse. A similarity is that the monster and Victor are both self-centered. The monster wants a mate for himself and does not think of the outcome it may have. Victor is self-centered because he created the monster because he originally wanted to have the power over science and life. He sooned learned that power was not all that he thought it was. Victor was also self-centered when he did not turn the monster into authorities when it started killing people. If he would have done this originally, he would not be in trouble or feel guilt and remorse. They both are similar because they are not very intelligent. Victor might have brains to build a body back but he was too arrogant and stupid to realize what could possibly happen. Likewise, the monster had the brain capacity of a baby and did not know anything socially or mentally at all. He just knew he wanted to get back at Victor for not building him a…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All along the novel, the theme of the double is recurrent. The Merriam-Webtser defines a doppelgänger as a ghostly counterpart of a living person or the evil alter-ego of a person. In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley used that very motif to describe and characterize her characters. Indeed, the Creature can be seen as the double of Victor. He represents the dark side of Victor. If Dr Frankenstein appears as a nice and totally human and normal man, Mary Shelley depicts him as the real monster of the story. He is blasphemous, he commits transgressive acts only to follow his obsession and to prove that he is right, that giving life is not a power only devoted to God. On the contrary, the Monster has a monstrous look, but in reality, the author makes us sympathize with him. She makes of him a learned, well-educated creature, able to feel regrets and pity, which Victor misses. Victor can also be seen as the doppleganger of Henry Clerval. In one hand, Victor embodies the corrupted science, who goes too far and makes weird and dangerous experiments to make progress. Indeed, in the novel this very character tries to be as good as God. He attempts to create life, like God created Adam. However, Victor's failure horrifies him to such an extent that he rejects his child/Creature. He learns different subjects, such as alchemy or even anatomy, and misuses his knowledge. On the other side, Henry Clerval is the perfect archetype of proper science. Victor embodies bad health, dangerous and corrupted knowledge, cowardice, secrecy and death, as for Henry, he personifies sanity, vigor, healthy knowledge and life. We could also add that the female characters are the counterpart of the male. Females are always passive characters, they never take the initiative in something and they depend of men, whereas male are always undertaking projects. The female monster is the perfect illustration of that fact : she “waits” for…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays