Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Example of philosophical critique

Good Essays
3395 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Example of philosophical critique
I. Title
Karl Marx’s Concept of Classless Society is Unattainable and Impractical

II. Introduction
We are living in a society where there are rich, not so rich, and poor people or we can say that we have the class in the society called the upper class, the middle class and the lower class. In reality we have this stratum. Many of us believe that those rich people become richer and those poor people continuously become poorer. It is one of the reason why the concept of Karl Marx about the classless society is ideal wherein there will be no classes and people will all be equal in the society.
The concept of classless society has been elaborated by Karl Marx, the father of Marxist philosophy which is the basis of the communist ideology. Classless society refers to a society in which no one is born into a social class. It is a society without the antagonistic classes or strata. It means a society in which the classes with opposing interests such as the land owners and the landless, workers and management, freemen and slaves, the rich and the poor, exploiter and the exploited, capitalists and laborers are not found.
In a classless society there should be an attempt to abolish all classes. Classes should not exist. Society must be conducted in such a way that the higher class or the evils of classes are liquidated. Privileges should be enjoyed by everyone. Society must aim at social justice where all will enjoy the equality of opportunity.
Karl Marx idea was indeed a good one. His idea about the classless society is being talked of in the past even in the present. It is an ideal society where there will be no class or strata and all the status of people are equal. But can we really speak of a classless society?

III. Thesis
Karl Marx has been regarded as the champion of communism and an advocate of “classless society.” Marxism is often known as a “philosophy of social revolution.” Marx never aspired for a revolution just for the sake of a revolution. He wanted to establish an egalitarian society know for quality and social coherence. He intended to see a “classless society” free from all types of exploitations.
Classless society means a society without the antagonistic classes or strata. It means society in which classes with opposing interest such as the land owners and the landless, workers and management, freemen and slaves, the rich and the poor, exploiters and the exploited capitalist and laborers are not found. Such type of society never existed in the past
Marx was sufficiently aware of the existence of classes. In Communist Manifesto he said that “the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggle” makes it evident that he knew that classes exist even in the beginning of history. In spite of the awareness of the existing class, Marx was having a dream in his mind. Since this society is hard to achieve, a revolution must happen between the rich and poor people or the capitalist against the workers. It cannot be attained in a peaceful way because those rich people will not give the control over the poor and the will not give up their wealth. He believes that class struggle would help the establishment of classless society.
There are some circumstances that favor the existence of classless society. As Marx stated, when the human society reaches the capitalist or the bourgeoisie and the working class or the proletariats, their interests’ always in clash and conflict arises. This conflict will be the reason for the social movements and revolutions. Marx believe that when the dictatorship of the proletariat happen it will lead to the transformation of society and this will culminates in the establishment of the classless society wherein no people are richer than the others. There will be no classes and all will be equal. There will be no leaders or powerful over others, but all will have the equal opportunity and privileges. Marx’s ideas bear great pertinence to contemporary times because inequality among the various economic classes is one of the most prominent political issues in this and other societies. We do today, for better or worse classify people according to wealth and abundance. Material wealth is an insatiable aim of each individual and this is precisely the reason that Marx’s vision of a classless society will never be realized. Equilibrium will never be achieved because human nature compels us to always search for greater wealth and to achieve a greater level of superiority over our fellow men. Humans are naturally capitalist and should be free to pursue their aspirations in a free and competitive atmosphere.
Now if we get rid of classes and we became a classless society and we were all the same it means that the workers will be paid the same amount of money. All workers no matter what job will have the same equal amount of payment. It will be unfair to those person who are more qualified, has more expertise, doing harder job to get paid equally with those person who’s doing less qualified job and easier job. So it means that classless society are in favor of those person who are unfortunate in life or those people who cannot have the chance to have good status but how about those persons who study hard, work hard just to improve their status in life? Classless society will block the motivation of people within the society since we will all have the same class distinctions. We study in order to have a better future and to have a qualified job, we work hard for us to have money and to improve our status in life. Society is built with motivation and incentives to get higher pay, to work their way up. So if we will have the same class together there will be no motivation for us to work hard and to work our way up.

IV. Antithesis
In most countries there are class divisions. These classes are based on many factors like religion, wealth, caste and color even habits have created classes. To have a classless society is a modem idea. Marxian theory of classless society is regarded as weakest link in his thought. This faith made him project his own concept of an ideal society.
Marxist-communists call for the establishment of a classless society where there the class structures are removed. This idea was impossible because no matter how we look at it, it is impossible to remove the class structure that we have within the society. Society has generally always has class structures within it. There are always been three distinctive classes, this are the upper class, middle class and lower class basically, the rich, the not-so-rich and the poor. Those communist and Marxist wants to get rid of this class structures for us to be in all same class together and that is impossible and it cannot happen from a hold number of standpoints. Class structures will always remain within the society but the key to dealing with class structures is not by removing them but making sure that there is no discrimination based on the class structures. It is by making sure that people from the lower class will not be discriminated by the upper class. They should have the same legal rights or the government who has the power should give the people what they need for them not to feel the unfairness on being in the lower class.
V. Synthesis So the concept of a classless society was to eliminate the classes or strata within the society. It aims to have a sense of equality wherein no people are richer than the others. In this ideal society there would be no discrimination and the rich class will no longer rule the society hence all the people will have the same standing within the society. They will have the same amount of privileges and opportunities. What you have is what everybody has. Since everyone is equal there will be no private ownership of property and all will belong to the people and the society they will have is communism. But then most countries are not under the communism wherein there are no strata because people have their own ideology. People have their own idea, since from the very beginning we have the class structures and class distinction will always remain in people’s mind.

VI. Conclusion/Recommendation
The topic Karl Marx’s concept of classless society is impossible and impractical states that the classless society was not achieved by the Marxists even after more than years of Marx’s death because it is nowhere to be seen in the society. Upon reviewing and gathering information that is related, the researchers proved that Marx’s advocacy about eliminating the classes strata didn’t come true since it is always on person’s mentality that there is always a superior and an inferior to them. It is right that everything should be fair and the class should be removed, but isn’t it everyone’s goal to be part of the higher class or the so called superior? In our society there are always people you look up and look down to and we all know crab mentality is a natural quality and a way of behavior that most people have due to survival. Therefore classless society is impossible to attain also, if classless society is achieved, people will not strive to be better because they will not see any reason to be competent anymore and the society will lose its balance.
Everyone will lose their sense of life and people will just simply exist and they will have no goals at all. If everything will be fair among the three classes; the upper class, the middle class, the lower class how about those people who are much more educated and suitable for higher jobs? What will be the purpose of education if everyone’s wages will be the same? Isn’t that unfair? It is okay if everything is not fair because not everyone is capable to reach a higher degree of education and not everyone have the same level of knowledge. As long as there will be no slavery and no one will violate the rights of the lower class in the society. We can always determine the society classes’ benefits because it helps achieve a balance community. This is the ideal way for people to live where everyone should work for their good and accomplish their goals with their own. It also improves people’s perseverance and initiative, considering they will become diligent. We all know these kinds of people helps the society evolves into a more progressive one.

VII. References http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/classlesssociety http://www.infobarrel.com/karlmarxsconceptofclasslesssociety (S.A Sheppard) http://www.shareyouressays.com/87093/essay-on-marxian-concept-of-classless-society (Neha Panshare) http://libcom.org/library/chapter-3-classless-society (Juan Conatz) http://www.open.edu/openlearn/society/politics-policy-people/sociology/can-there-ever-be-classless-society (Jonathan Ree) http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/classlesssociety http://www.egs.edu/library/karl-marx/biography/ http://redoedo.blogspot.com/2008/12classless-society-aimof-marx.html (Redoedo)

VIII. Philosopher’s Background
Karl Heinrich Marx (1818-1883) was born on May 5, 1818 in the city of Trier, Germany. His father was a lawyer who came from a long line of Rabbis, but had changed his faith to Protestantism in order to keep his job. Karl Marx went to the University of Bonn to study law when he was 17 years old. Here he became engaged to Jenny von Westphalen, whose father, Baron von Westphalen, influenced Marx to read Romantic literature and Saint-Simonian politics. Only a year later, Marx was moved by his father to the University of Berlin where he studied Hegelianism, influenced by Ludwig Feurbach and other Hegelians. He admired G.W.F. Hegel's dialectics and belief in historical inevitability, but Marx questioned the idealism and abstract thought of philosophy and maintained his belief that reality lies in the material base of economics. In distinct contrast to G.W.F. Hegel's concentration on the state in his philosophy of law, Marx saw civil society as the sphere to be studied in order to understand the historical development of humankind. In 1841 Marx earned his doctorate at Jena with his work on the materialism and atheism of Greek atomists.

It was difficult for Marx to find publishers because of his radical political views, so he moved to Cologne, which was known to house a strong liberal opposition movement. The liberal group the Cologne Circle published a paper by Marx defending the freedom of the press in their newspaper The Rhenish Gazette (in 1842 he was made the editor of the paper). In Cologne Marx met Moses Hess, a radical who organized socialist meetings, which Marx attended. At these meetings Marx learned of the struggles of the German working-class. Based on the information he gathered from the members present at the meetings, Marx wrote an article on the poverty of the Mosel wine-farmers in which he was highly critical of the government. When the article was published in 1843, the Prussian authorities banned The Rhenish Gazette and threatened Marx with his arrest. Marx married his fiancé and they fled together to Paris. Here he took a position as editor of a political journal called Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher (Franco-German Annals) that was designed to connect French socialism and radical Hegelianism. Although the journal only lived as long as one issue, it was a valuable opportunity for Marx. Through it he met his life-long friend Friedrich Engels, a contributor to the journal. Other prominent contributors included his old mentor from Berlin, Bruno Bauer, and the Russian anarchist Michael Bakunin.
While in Paris, Marx became a communist, and worked primarily on studying political economy and the history of the French Revolution. He wrote a series of papers known as ÷konomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre (Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, 1844), however they were not published until the 1930s. The Manuscripts are influenced by Feuerbach and outline a humanist idea of communism. Marx contrasts capitalist society, and an alienated nature of labor, with communist society, in which human beings in cooperative production develop their nature freely. In 1844 Marx reviewed Bruno Bauer's book On the Jewish Question. More than a review, Marx used the article to critique the continued influence of religion over politics, and propose a revolutionary change to the structure of European society.

In 1845 Marx was expelled from France by Guizot. He fled with Friedrich Engelsto Brussels where they stayed for three years with intermittent trips to England to visit Engels' family who had cotton-spinning interests in Manchester. While in Brussels Marx wrote a piece against the idealistic socialism of P.J. Proudhon called The Poverty of Philosophy. He also worked on his materialist conception of history, and developed the manuscript that would come to be named The German Ideology when it was published after his death. This paper argues that the nature of an individual is dependent upon the material conditions that determine his production. It is a historical study of modes of production through the ages, and in it Marx predicts the collapse of industrial capitalism and the advancement of communism. Marx joined the Communist League at this time, which was an organization of German émigré workers centered in London. Marx and Engels became the major theoretical force of the League, and at a conference in 1847 they were commissioned to write a declaration of the League's position. The hope was that the Manifest der kommunistischen Partei (The Communist Manifesto) would inspire social revolution, and no sooner was it published than the 1848 revolutions broke out across Europe. This work marks a turn in Marx's writing from appealing to natural rights as justification for social reform, to indicating that the laws of history would inevitably lead to the power of the working class. The Manifesto distinguishes communism from other movements, proposes specific social reforms, and includes a description of the struggles between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. It also explicitly encourages workers to unite in revolution against the existing regimes.
The panic caused by the February revolution of 1848 caused the Belgian government to expel Marx from Brussels. He was invited by the French provisional government to return to Paris. From there, he returned to Cologne with some friends to start the newspaper the Neue Rheinische Zeitung. The government there attempted to shut down the paper through legal means and finally succeeded by finding pretexts to expel the editors. Marx and his friends were expelled after the revolts of May 1849, and the newspaper's last edition was June 1849. Marx had to return to Paris, but he was expelled again immediately, and moved on to London, which would be his final home.

In London Marx rejoined with the Communist League, confident that there would be further revolutionary action in Europe. He proceeded to write two pamphlets about the 1848 revolution in France and its effects, titled, The Class Struggles in France and The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. He felt that new revolution would only be possible if there was to be a new crisis, and he hoped to uncover what would cause this crisis. He spent a large amount of his time in the British Museum studying political economy toward this end. For the first part of the 1850s Marx, Jenny, and their four children lived in an impoverished state in a three room flat in London's Soho. The couple would have two more children, but only three in all would survive. The family survived primarily on gifts from Friedrich Engels whose own income came from the family business in Manchester. Marx also earned a small amount from articles he wrote as the foreign correspondent for the New York Daily Tribune. In 1864 Marx and Friedrich Engels together founded the International Workingmen's Association, which would finally break up due to disagreements between Marx and the anarchist Mikhail Babuknin.

By 1857 Marx had written an 800-page manuscript which was to become Das Kapital (Capital). This is his major work on political economy, capital, landed property, the state, wage labor, foreign trade and the world market. In the early part of the 1860s he took a break from his work on Das Kapital to work on Theories of Surplus Value, a three-volume work. This text discusses specific theories of political economy, primarily those of Adam Smith and David Ricardo. In 1867 Marx published volume I of Das Kapital, an analysis of the capitalist process of production, with an elaboration on his version of labor theory value, surplus value, and exploitation, that he predicted would lead to a falling profit rate and the collapse of industrial capitalism. Marx continued to work on Volumes II and III of Das Kapital for the rest of his life, even though they were essentially finished in the late 1860s. Friedrich Engels would publish the last two volumes after Marx's death. By 1871 Marx's daughter Eleanor, who was 17 at the time, was helping her father with his work. She had been taught at home by Marx himself, and grew up with a rich understanding of the capitalist system which would allow her to play an important part in the future of the British labor movement.

Marx's health rapidly declined during the last ten years of his life and he was unable to work at the same impressive pace he had set in his early years. He still paid close attention to contemporary politics, especially concerning Germany and Russia, and he often offered his comments. In his Critique of the Gotha Programme he critiqued the actions of his admirers Karl Liebknecht and August Bebel, disagreeing with their compromises with state socialism in the interest of a united socialist party. He indicated in his letters to Vera Zasulich of this time that he imagined it could be possible for Russia to bypass a capitalist stage of development and move directly to communism by basing its economy on common ownership of land characterized by the village. In 1881 both Marx and his wife became ill. Marx had a swollen liver, and survived, but Jenny died on December 2, 1881. In January 1883 Marx was deeply saddened by the loss of his eldest daughter to cancer of the bladder. On March 14, 1883 Marx was found having passed away in his armchair. He is buried at Highgate Cemetery in London.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The original intent of communism was meant to have a classless society. However, the soviet…

    • 680 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, it is possible to create a classless society between individuals. Pol Pot was a political leader whose communist Khmer Rouge government led Cambodia from 1975 to 1979, he created his Utopia vision of a classless society by bring great destruction and terror to his country and to his people. Pol Pot brought devastation to Cambodia through the use of a group called Khmer Rouge which controlled and instilled fear into the people of Cambodia. He began to forcefully take children from their parents and turning them into soldiers. He destroyed all Cambodia’s political, economic and social aspects.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Karl Marx, the struggle between the upper class, the bourgeoisie and the lower class, the proletariat, has always been a constant conflict throughout history. The bourgeoisie controlled all means of production and continuously oppressed the proletariat, which was unfair because the proletariats were the ones doing hard labor, yet the bourgeoisie gained all of the benefits. Marx believed that in order to end this class struggle, class distinctions would need to be eliminated. In order for everybody in society to be considered equal, there could be no private ownership of materials. If private ownership of materials were allowed, then some people would have more things than other people which would create another class and thus another conflict. Therefore, an equalized society would get rid of all conflict. Marxism has been…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 21st Century in North America the people were divided in 3 main categories which were the rich, the middle-class, and the poor. People who are poor and/or middle class sometimes believe in the society’s norms and attitudes toward them. Internalized classism is the explanation of classism by middle class and poor people. Some examples of internalized classism are: that they feel week towards higher-class people, middle class people feel superior to people categorized on the lower class of them, and when people believe that classist assumptions are fair. People who are middle-class and wealthy sometimes believe the society’s beliefs and attitudes toward them, and which result into the middle-class people to wanting to use the same remarks that they get from rich people to the poor people. Depending on what class a person is in decides what privileges and advantages they get. The advantages that rich working…

    • 1216 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are a number of different sociological perspectives that attempt to explain class stratification. One theory of which is Marxism. Karl Marx believed that there was a definite conflict between the classes, and that the system of stratification derives from different social groups and their relations to the means of production. From Marx's perspective, a class group is when all it's members share the same relations to the means of production. Marxism also believes that there are only 2 classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, showing social closure. The bourgeoisie exploit the proletariat who have to sell their labour to the ruling class. Marx believed that the…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sociology Final Exam

    • 2046 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1.)Social class is a “class society, a set of concepts in the social sciences and political theory centered on models of social stratification in which people are grouped into a set of hierarchical social categories”( Grant,2001,p.161). The most common being the upper, middle, and lower classes. The upper class consist of people or families that represent institutional leadership, heads of multinational corporations, foundations, and universities. They are people who have finical stability and are well educated due to their finical income. Most commonly in American society today people fall in the middle class category. Middle class is made of people and families that are involved in clerical work, provide professional support, and engage in data collection. Even though they are educated based on local school systems they are not given the luxury education that you would fine with upper class. Last but not least you have the lower class. The lower class is commonly the hardworking of them all. They work full-time at wages below poverty line and commonly are on some type of social services help such as Medicaid or food stamp program (EBT).Even though they are entitled to education they commonly would rather work to just get by day to day due to finical struggles. Based on these classes’ people in today’s society have certain criteria that are used to determine ones place within the social class scale. Three most common criteria used to measure social class is wealth (property), power and prestige.…

    • 2046 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In today standards, society has developed into the concept of social classification by placing people into different social standards by using economic, political, and socio-economic status. This system of social classification contributes to the problems that develop in the lower and middle classes because how much they have to handle to keep up with today standards in the United States. America is supposed to be a place where all people are equal, but the way social classes work divide this country up by multiple conditions. Sadly, everyone today talks about the social class being a “social norm” in American society, where the upper class has more advantage and a controlling place in today society. What the upper social class society does…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx in Soho

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Karl Marx was regarded as the father of communism. He criticized the dominant form of government during his time which was capitalism. Capitalism encourages competition among the people and gives rewards unequally. He argued that capitalist nations allowed the few wealthy people to amass a great fortune while the masses seemed to work harder with little reward for their efforts (Ebrey et. al., 2005). The rich kept the resources for themselves, often denying the poor of an equal opportunity.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    unit 7 p1

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marxism was introduced and studied by Karl Marx during 1818 and 1883. The Marxist view is based on the conflicts and interests of the society, it also strongly highlights on the importance of conflict in societies and communities. They also believe that economics are the bases of progressing and social life this can be achieved by struggling through social classes. The two classes that Marx discussed about were the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie class is a small powerful group who may have owned factories or own companies whereas the Proletariat is a poorer group of workers. The way a Marxists thinks is based on the financial structures and systems as well as social class meaning that these factors are vital in the Marxist view.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Class In America

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails, and where any one class is made to feel that society is an organized conspiracy to oppress, rob and degrade them, neither persons nor property will be safe,” said by Frederick Douglass. What is class? Class in today's society can mean anything. Class is something one can have, one can be a part of or one can be limited to. Class as a whole isn't just about where you stand financially but it is where you're placed in society. Class has everything to do with your foundation. This paper talks about the lower, middle and upper class but it also address other issues as to being degraded and discriminated against because of where you stand in civilization.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Class In Society

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dictionary.com defines social class as “a broad group in society having common economic, cultural, or political status.” Despite having its advantages, social class has many faults. It can contaminate our minds and make us think class and money are all that matters. Social class has changed a lot over the years, and it is still present today. While some want to be in a higher class because they want more money, others just want to achieve fame and recognition. The class system creates a world where the upper class interacts with the upper class, the middle with the middle, and the lower with the lower. Social class has been evident in history for many centuries, modern culture, and our everyday lives.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx believed that society is based upon a conflict between Bourgeoisies (Ruling class, Upper class) and Proletariat (Working class). Marx believed that the ruling class were exploiting the working class.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Role Of Sri Sharanaru

    • 3905 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Thinker about classless society:- ‘Nobody owns anything but everybody owns everything’ [Karl Marx] Dr.Sharanaru said there are three types persons in our society, such as some are creator of nothing, [vacuum] some are filling the nothing, [vacuum] & some are come out from nothing [vacuum]. So all are belong to nothing, which means all are equal in the view of world. But some ignored persons fighting against property, money, status, power, position etc.. But the society provides equal facilities to all, but in that some vested interests oppressed on delicate & poor peoples.…

    • 3905 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays