Preview

Examine the Key Ideas Associated with Law and Punishment

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1930 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examine the Key Ideas Associated with Law and Punishment
Examine the key ideas associated with law and punishment

Law and Punishment go hand in hand. There are Laws, which are the system of rules which a particular country or community recognises as regulating the actions of followers, and there are punishments, for when a member of said country/community breaks the rules. Punishment is defined as the infliction of a penalty or to cause pain for an offence. Most of the time it is not a choice as to whether you are part of a law-following community because almost all countries in the world have some kind of law-system and often the minute you turn the age where you are legally responsible or step off the boat, plane or train you are subjected to their laws.

The Biblical views on punishment have often been based on the old testament teaching ‘an eye for an eye’. The bible also lays out punishments for certain crimes that appear to follow this teaching.
Except that there are many punishments in the bible that seem to be out of proportion to the crime e.g. “whoever curses his father or his mother will be put to death”. There are many problems with this statement for example it does not state how old the son/daughter has to be to deserve this punishment, it seems to imply even a 4 year old who does not necessarily know what they are saying can be put to death for cursing their parents. An eye for an eye is also relevant in today’s laws, it is the basis of retributive justice that is present in our society. Retributive justice is the idea that those who have done the crime should somehow pay back for what they did. Rachel’s said “People deserve to be treated in the same way that they have (voluntarily treated others)” This seems like a fair way of treating someone because why someone should be allowed to do one thing and then not expect to be treated in the same way? But some punishments that are retributive e.g. capital punishment do not seem to benefit society and there is a risk of the punishment becoming

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi

    • 691 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe that there are some that need a harsh punishment to learn their lesson. Others need to be shown justice and mercy. Hammurabi’s Code provided a little bit of both almost 4,000 years ago. It was 1792 B.C.E, when Hammurabi rose to power as the ruler of Babylon. After ruling for 30 years, he created a set of laws. These laws were called the “Hammurabi’s Code”. He created this code with 282 laws because he was concerned about keeping order in his kingdom. They were carved on a stele made black diorite and placed three of them around his kingdom. Hammurabi's code has been called the first set of laws. But were these laws just and fair or were they too harsh? Looking at the three sets of laws; family law, injury law and property law we see that Hammurabi's code was a just and fair set of laws for the most part although there were many extreme laws that were very violent and could be considered harsh, severe and unjust. In the United States our Constitution forbids such cruel and unusual punishment. Hammurabi will be remembered as a smart and organized ruler who was the first one to establish a set of laws for a civilization.…

    • 691 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Response Paper 2

    • 815 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “When men fight and one of them pushes a pregnant women and a miscarriage results, but no other damage ensues, the one responsible shall be fined…But if other damage ensues, the penalty shall be life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.” Those are the exact words from Exodus 21 found in the Bible. When the Rabbis were discussing that passage, they ended up with a different idea. An idea involving financial compensation rather than literal, physical punishment. Of course, there were other Rabbis who would agree with my point, saying “Why [pay compensation]? Does the divine Law not say Eye for eye? Why not take this literally?” (Rabbinic Discussion of Exodus 21)…

    • 815 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From Miller’s humanistic view of the article, it makes plenty of sense, but the Christian perspective says otherwise. Under the new covenant of grace, the punishments listed in the old testament law are no longer necessary to maintain peace with God. Jesus paid the ultimate price for everyones’ sins, including capital crimes. Life is sacred and murder…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, these laws followed lex talionis: an eye for an eye, where the punishments are scaled to fit the crime. People were not equal under the law; slaves and the lower classes were subjected to harsher and cruel punishments. On the other hand, everyone was judged equally under the Jewish Law. Punishments were just, people had to either work off their debts or help those they wronged; this instilled a greater sense of community. Monotheism affected the way society functioned and it solidified people’s moral values.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a contemporary society where crime takes place we expect the state authority to dispense justice in the form of punishment to maintain social solidarity. There are many forms of punishment that can be given to an offender, each with their own functions for the offender and society itself.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Bible there are many verses that support using the death penalty. One of the core verses to see the support of capital punishment in the Bible is Exodus 21:23-25. This verse states one of the most iconic revenge phrases: “an eye for an eye.” Also, earlier in the passage it states says “whoever strikes a man so that he dies shall be put to death.”(ESV) There is a common Biblical principle that is accepted in society. That principle is that you will reap what you sew. You will have consequences for whatever you do, wether that be if you speed, you will get ticketed. The Bible supports capital punishment by the simple principle that there are consequences to our actions.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Criminals

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sentencing is an important aspect in the criminal justice process. It is the punishment defendants receive when they are convicted of a crime. The punishment spectrum is wide and vast, ranging from probation to death. Punishment and sentencing present some of the most complex issues of the criminal justice system. There are four main philosophical reasons surrounding the purpose of sentencing; they are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation. Retribution is the philosophy that a criminal's punishment shall be determined on the severity of the crime he or she committed. It should be noted that retribution is not the same thing as revenge and that the punishment does not satisfy the revenge theory to anyone who may have been a victim. The retribution philosophy also is inspired by the Old Testament, where it states "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." Deterrence philosophy has two parts to it, which are the general and specific deterrence. The Deterrence philosophy is based on the fact that a criminal will realize the punishment outweighs the crime that he or she is going to commit. This philosophy hopes to prevent the criminal from going through with the criminal act. The general deterrence works this way, if the punishment is seen to outweigh the crime then others will be deterred from committing the same crime. The specific deterrence is based on the theory that a criminal, once punished and released, will not want to commit another crime and receive the same punishment. The Incapacitation philosophy believes by incarcerating criminals, this takes away the criminals liberty by placing them in jail or prison; this will ultimately keep the criminal from committing further crimes among society and reduce further criminal opportunity. Rehabilitation is another means of trying to reduce criminal activity. Rehabilitation will teach a person not to commit further criminal acts. This philosophy believes that the public is better…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is a highly controversial and emotional subject in which most people seem to have strong opinions. The debate is by no means new, however, in my opinion, the death penalty is cruel and inhumane. During biblical time, capital punishment has been an issue.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Punishment Research Paper

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Citizens are being arrested every single day for an unlimited variety of reasons. The reason can be anything from abuse of a family member, robbery, drug possession, or murder. The criminal system has four ways to justify punishment. Retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and social protection are ways in which punishment is justified. Each of the four has its own style of punishment together with its own pros and cons for each Citizen.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are four main philosophical reasons that surround the purposes of sentencing a criminal, which are retribution, incapacitation, deterrence, and rehabilitation. First is retribution which is based on a perceived need for vengeance, used in the earliest societies. Whereas they believed in punishments to fit the crimes, which was stated in the bible. In the “Old Testament dictum of “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” –often cited as an ancient justification for retribution- which was believed to be intended to reduce severe punishment for minor crimes.” Second of criminal sentencing is incapacitation which protects members of society who may be in danger of harm by the offender. Incapacitation is not a punishment but a restraint to separate the offenders from endangering the community. Next is deterrence which is the fear of punishment to deter people from committing a crime. There are two different deterrence’s which is special deterrence and general deterrence. Special deterrence seeks to reduce repeat offenses by the convicted offenders and general deterrence strives to influence the future behavior of people who have not yet been arrested and who may be tempted to turn to crime. (Schmalleger, 2011) The fourth and last philosophical reason is rehabilitation, which is an attempt to reform a criminal and their behavior. Rehabilitation works through education and psychological treatment to reduce any future criminality.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death penalty, or also known as the capital punishment, is one of the most debated topics in the judicial system of the world. It has existed long before 2500 BC, when Hammurabi (Mesopotamia civilization) created the first written law called ‘Codex Hammurabi’. The principal of the codex is generally ‘eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth’. At that time, it was most likely if a person committed a capital crime, such as murder or theft, they were executed to maintain harmony in the community and to bring solace to those who knew the victim. Mesopotamia’s culture of killing a criminal was carried out into this modern era. But the truth is, it has basically divided the world into two groups –those who support death penalty, and those who against it.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frequently misunderstood by Christians is the “eye-for-an-eye” (Exod. 21:24) maxim to which Jesus alluded (Matt. 5:38). As understood in Jesus’ day, it meant restitution, not retaliation. If one blinds another’s eye, one compensates the victim — in money — for the value of the eye. The Talmud says repeatedly, “Eye for eye means pecuniary compensation,” and Jewish courts apparently never read physical punishment into the lex talion.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some Christians believe that punishing criminals is the only way victims can get justice. Capital punishment is the execution of a person because of a crime that they have committed. It is otherwise know as the death penalty. Some Christians and victims’ families would agree that this is the only way of getting justice for the most serious crimes such as murder. There is evidence in the Old Testament to support this such as ‘an eye for and eye and a tooth for a tooth’ and ‘those who draw the sword shall die by the sword’. This implies that retribution and protection is the only way to find justice for the victims and their families. Roman Catholics believe that the use of the death penalty is justified in certain extreme situations where it is the only option available to protect society.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, as humans, one should always give a chance for another to reform. What people do not recognize is that the world cannot reform itself without self-change; the guilty have a chance to change themselves too. One of the Bible’s purposes is to state laws of humanity and morals, such as Matthew 5:44 which states, “But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.” The meaning of this verse is to elaborate on the subject of serving and encouraging one to change themselves, and pray for them. Matthew 5:44 closely relates to the idea of why the trial of one’s persecution should be abolished. Humans need to learn to give a second opportunity, considering it could be one day when they are in a similar situation.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Punishment (also known as discipline or penalty) is the authoritative imposition of something undesirable or unpleasant on, or the removal of something desirable or pleasant from, a person, animal, organization or entity in response to behavior deemed unacceptable by an individual, group or other entity.[1][2][3][4][5] The authority may be either a group or a single person, and punishment may be carried out formally under a system of law or informally in other kinds of social settings such as within a family.[2] Negative consequences that are not authorized or that are administered without a breach of rules are not considered to be punishment as defined here.[4] The study and practice of the punishment of crimes, particularly as it applies to imprisonment, is called penology, or, often in modern texts, corrections; in this context, the punishment process is euphemistically called "correctional process".[6] Research into punishment often includes similar research into prevention.…

    • 12621 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Good Essays