Preview

Examine the Case for Innate Ideas

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
927 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examine the Case for Innate Ideas
Critically examine the case for innate ideas

A fundamental part of a rationalists belief is that we obtain knowledge in thought by just thinking rather than from experience, for these reasons the idea that we are born with innate ideas are crucial to any rationalist. In this essay I will explore the concept of innate ideas and the rationalist’s arguments to support the idea and also the empiricists ideas to argue against the idea.
The idea of innate ideas is that from birth we already have ideas in our minds and that we are not a blank sheet, some people believe these ideas are put into our minds by god. Rationalists also believe that we do not need experience to acquire these ideas and we are capable of unlocking these ideas through thinking alone, any empiricist would not be fond of this view.
Rationalists have several ideas they believe we are born with and do not gain through experience for example: God, we as humans have never experienced god and yet we still have an idea of god therefore we must have an innate idea of god. However the apparent fact that we all have the same innate idea of supreme being is unjustified as many depictions of god seem to be based on the culture of the society, for example many African religious groups have depicted Jesus as black African, whilst Leonardo da Vinci’s picture of the last supper pictures him as a white man (according to Christianity God, Jesus, and the holy spirit are all one being). Another good example is Maths we have never experienced, for example, the number 3 however we have the idea of 3 in our minds and we understand the concept. A final example is simple logical truths for example we know that it can’t be raining and not raining in the same place at the same time.
Another example of innate ideas is Meno’s slave boy. The story goes like this, Socrates asked Meno’s slave boy to double the area of a square the slave boy couldn’t but when Socrates drew a line through the square the slave managed to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    References: Able To Know. (2009). What is traditional thinking? Para. 4, Line 2. Retrieved October 02, 2010…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapters 6 And 7 Module 2

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    and how the perception reduces the matter in motion. The things that are real outside of us, are the…

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Epistemology Phil/201 Quiz

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | __________________ combined rationalism and empiricism, showing how both played a role in our understanding…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psych 110 Exam 1 Study Guide

    • 2743 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Nativists think knowledge comes from inborn characteristics of the brain, that is we are predisposed to learn certain things. Empiricists think we start out with a blank slate and acquire knowledge through experiences with the world.…

    • 2743 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Innateness Perspective: innateness is the behaviours, skills and characteristics that are instinctive. Noam Chomsky is a leading theorist who suggested that language is natural and instinctive and that children come primed, not only ready to learn language but also to pick up the rules of grammar. He refers to “Universal Grammar” which believes suggests that there are some structures and rules which are the same in all languages and which enables babies to pick up any language at first.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rationalists define innate ideas as ideas (concepts or propositions) whose content can’t be gained from experience, but which are triggered by experience.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Critique of Pure Reason Kant discusses the dispute between rationalism and empiricism. The empiricists argued that all ideas are derived from sensation, and that objects of sensation are the only proper objects of knowledge. The rationalists argued that some ideas are not derived from sensation but are instead innate to reason, and that these ideas provide one with knowledge of supersensible realities such as God. Kant argues how knowledge is devoted to the power of demonstrating the truth or falsity of an idea, and that this power is restricted to the domain of sensibility. He stated that…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essential the thoughts were concepted in a similar notion. Being intuitive about your surrounding and come the realization of an idea and taking action on it, not just letting it simmer around in the brain and eventually becoming nothing than a forgotten memory or regret.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical Foundationalism

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2.Rationalism and empiricism are both views of how people gain knowledge. Rationalism is the view that knowledge comes from reason and what makes sense. While empiricism is the view that knowledge is gained by experiences.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In your own words detail the ‘for’ and ‘against’ arguments with regard to innate and learned behaviour.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Eureka Phenomenon

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Many components make up the thought process. There is one component that is the sole incubator of all thoughts, the brain. The brain is the sole incubator of the mind. The mind cradles and protects the thought process. The process used to think is one of complex scrutiny. Researchers, Scientists and Psychologists have studied the brain and how the brain processes thoughts for years. The brain processes thoughts through a channel known as the mind. The mind according to the mirriam-webster dictionary is the element or complex of elements in an individual that feels, perceives, thinks, wills and especially reasons. Another definition of the mind according to the mirriam-webster dictionary is the organized conscious and unconscious adaptive mental activity of an organism. The mind is an interesting and complex instrument that many are still amazed by. There are several components of the mind to be discussed. Components making up the mind’s existence are consciousness, unconsciousness, thoughts, understanding and intellect. Consciousness according to the mirriam-webster dictionary is having the mental faculties not dulled by sleep, faintness or stupor; perceiving, apprehending, or noticing with a degree of controlled thought or observation. Unconsciousness according to the mirriam-webster dictionary is not knowing or perceiving; not aware; free from self-awareness. Thoughts according to the mirriam-webster dictionary is a developed intention or plan as well as the intellectual product or the organized views and principals of a period, place, group or individual. To understand according to the mirriam-webster dictionary is the mental grasp; the power to make experience intelligible by applying concepts and categories. Intellect according to the mirriam-webster dictionary is the power of knowing as distinguished from the power to feel and will; the capacity for knowledge. All of these components make up the mind as well as contributes to the…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    epistemology

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Professors Cappon and Myers agree that the process of intuition is an important way to attain knowledge. However Myers criticizes intuition as a perilous means of knowing. This paper will demonstrate that, perhaps instinct is not a foolproof means of attaining knowledge, nevertheless reasoning and logic can fail us as well. It is the human mind rather then the process that causes the error in both causes. Intuition, then, is by no means inferior to the other processes of attaining knowledge.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dispute between rationalism and empiricism concerns the extent to which we are dependent upon sense experience, and the doubt of everything in effort to gain knowledge. Philosophers have deepened our knowledge as to how we will approach the education of young children, whether it will be the rationalism or empiricism approach. John Locke was an empiricist because he believed our knowledge comes to us from experience, specifically the faculties of sensation and reflection. On the other hand, the rationalists believe that the source of knowledge is reason, not experience. The knowledge that comes from reason leads us to philosopher Descartes, whom believes reason is the only method to attaining knowledge. These two approaches lead to confusion…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nature of Thought

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The nature of thought is a fascinating topic for conversation; however, in order to understand it one must also know the different facets of thinking. The three major aspects to explore when discussing thinking are the sensing process, memory, and medium. There are also certain perceptual blocks, thoughts, and personal barriers that may hinder a person’s thought process.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why and How Ideas Matter

    • 11673 Words
    • 47 Pages

    Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (First published in French 1972.) Coleman, James S. 1964. Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. New York: Free Press. Eyerman, Ron, and Andrew Jamison, eds. 1991. Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. University Park. PA: Penn State University Press. Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon. -----. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage. Geertz, Clifford. 1964. Ideology as a cultural system. Pp. 47-76, ed., Ideology and Discontent, ed. D. E. Apter. New York: Free Press. (Reprinted in C. Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books 1973, 193-233.) Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press. -----.1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press. Gramsci. Antonio. 1975. Prison Notebooks. New York: Columbia University Press. (Written 1928-1937). Hall, Peter A. 1989. The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Hedström, Peter and Richard Swedberg, eds., 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. James, Harold. 1989. What is Keynesian about deficit financing? The case of interwar Germany. In Hall 1989: 231-62. Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan. Mannheim, Karl. 1936. Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World. Marx, Karl. 1978. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Excerpted on Pp. 3-6 in The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd edition, ed. R. C. Tucker. New York: Norton. (First published in 1859.) ----- and Friedrich Engels. 1978. The German Ideology, Part I. Pp. 146-200 in The Marx-Engels Reader. 2nd edition, ed. R. C. Tucker. New York: Norton. (Written in 1845-46, first published in 1932).…

    • 11673 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Powerful Essays