evolution of national security act
Agriculture Market Committee _________________ Appellant
v.
Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd. _______________Respondent
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT
INDEX OF ABBREVIATIONS…………………………………………………………………….. III
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES……………………………………………….…………………………IV
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION………………………………………………..………………..VII
STATEMENT OF FACTS………………………………………………………………………….VIII
STATEMENT OF ISSUES………………………………………………………………………......XI
SUMMARY OF PLEADINGS………………………………………………………………………XII
PLEADINGS………………………………………………………………………………………….1
1. Whether the rule 74(2) and bye-law 24(5) are in accordance with the principal act laid down by the legislature that is, The Sale of Goods Act,1930?
2. Whether the sale is concluded in Kerala or in Hyderabad (where weighment of Copra was done)?
PRAYER…………………………….......…………..………………………………………………XIII
INDEX OF ABBREVIATIONS
A.P. : Andhra Pradesh
AIR : All India Reporter
Anr. : Another
Ors. : Others
SC : Supreme Court
SCC : Supreme Court Cases u/s : Under Section
v. : Versus
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
Statutes
Indian Contract Act, 1872
The Sale of Goods Act, 1930
Cases
Amrik Singh v. State of Punjab, 1972 Cr LJ 465 : (1972) 4 SCC (N) 42 (SC)
Appu v. State of Kerala, 1990 Cr LJ 36
Awadhesh Roy Vs. State of Jharkhand (Decided on 12/6/2006)
Babubhai R. Patel v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1994 Sc 1400
Books
'Sale of Goods', 2008 Edition, Universal Law Publishing Co.
R.K. Bangia., 'Law of Contract-Part II’,2008 Edition , Allahabad Law Agency
Web References www.manupatra.com www.scconline.com www.indiankanoon.com www.vakeelbabu.com www.vakilno1.com STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
The Respondent humbly submits this memorandum before this Hon’ble court. The
v.
Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd. _______________Respondent
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT
INDEX OF ABBREVIATIONS…………………………………………………………………….. III
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES……………………………………………….…………………………IV
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION………………………………………………..………………..VII
STATEMENT OF FACTS………………………………………………………………………….VIII
STATEMENT OF ISSUES………………………………………………………………………......XI
SUMMARY OF PLEADINGS………………………………………………………………………XII
PLEADINGS………………………………………………………………………………………….1
1. Whether the rule 74(2) and bye-law 24(5) are in accordance with the principal act laid down by the legislature that is, The Sale of Goods Act,1930?
2. Whether the sale is concluded in Kerala or in Hyderabad (where weighment of Copra was done)?
PRAYER…………………………….......…………..………………………………………………XIII
INDEX OF ABBREVIATIONS
A.P. : Andhra Pradesh
AIR : All India Reporter
Anr. : Another
Ors. : Others
SC : Supreme Court
SCC : Supreme Court Cases u/s : Under Section
v. : Versus
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
Statutes
Indian Contract Act, 1872
The Sale of Goods Act, 1930
Cases
Amrik Singh v. State of Punjab, 1972 Cr LJ 465 : (1972) 4 SCC (N) 42 (SC)
Appu v. State of Kerala, 1990 Cr LJ 36
Awadhesh Roy Vs. State of Jharkhand (Decided on 12/6/2006)
Babubhai R. Patel v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1994 Sc 1400
Books
'Sale of Goods', 2008 Edition, Universal Law Publishing Co.
R.K. Bangia., 'Law of Contract-Part II’,2008 Edition , Allahabad Law Agency
Web References www.manupatra.com www.scconline.com www.indiankanoon.com www.vakeelbabu.com www.vakilno1.com STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
The Respondent humbly submits this memorandum before this Hon’ble court. The