Evidence Does Not Currently Support The Existence Of Ghosts By Benjamin Radford
Ghosts Real or Not?
As technology demands more from human existence, many interpretations of different phenomenons are misunderstood. The world is filled with many misunderstood paradoxes that makes us uncomfortable but they still exist in dark places. To further expand the topic, ghosts are spirits that still need evidence to make their existence. In an article, Evidence Does Not Currently Support the Existence of Ghosts by Benjamin Radford published in 2013, speaks of antagonistic credibility on the topic of the existence of ghosts. Many people believe that ghosts are just things we experience when our brain plays tricks on us as evidence demonstrates. With that in mind, ghosts, according to many movies or even ghost hunters, use tools to assist with their discovery of spirits around the world. However, to such extend, their validity can be compromise if technology, as well as personal misjudgment is actively revealed to be something else. …show more content…
The existence of ghosts can also have logical explanations or simple ignorance of unscientific techniques. In a similar though, the value assumption made by the author was that ghosts, according to many studies and logical research, do not exist on any circumstance. In contrast, the reality assumption, according to Benjamin Radford, ghosts as other unproven phenomenons do exists but searching in the right place with evidence to suggest so. The value and reality assumptions can be tested to be true or false with specific tests or procedures to see if ghosts really exists and not having scientific or logical explanation. Benjamin Radford conducted this analytical evidence to deny the existence of ghosts. To do so he wants to prove to many people that many ghost hunters are using falsely equipment to identify spirits that do not exists at that
As technology demands more from human existence, many interpretations of different phenomenons are misunderstood. The world is filled with many misunderstood paradoxes that makes us uncomfortable but they still exist in dark places. To further expand the topic, ghosts are spirits that still need evidence to make their existence. In an article, Evidence Does Not Currently Support the Existence of Ghosts by Benjamin Radford published in 2013, speaks of antagonistic credibility on the topic of the existence of ghosts. Many people believe that ghosts are just things we experience when our brain plays tricks on us as evidence demonstrates. With that in mind, ghosts, according to many movies or even ghost hunters, use tools to assist with their discovery of spirits around the world. However, to such extend, their validity can be compromise if technology, as well as personal misjudgment is actively revealed to be something else. …show more content…
The existence of ghosts can also have logical explanations or simple ignorance of unscientific techniques. In a similar though, the value assumption made by the author was that ghosts, according to many studies and logical research, do not exist on any circumstance. In contrast, the reality assumption, according to Benjamin Radford, ghosts as other unproven phenomenons do exists but searching in the right place with evidence to suggest so. The value and reality assumptions can be tested to be true or false with specific tests or procedures to see if ghosts really exists and not having scientific or logical explanation. Benjamin Radford conducted this analytical evidence to deny the existence of ghosts. To do so he wants to prove to many people that many ghost hunters are using falsely equipment to identify spirits that do not exists at that