Preview

Euthyphro's Dilemm Unrestricted Divine Command Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1305 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthyphro's Dilemm Unrestricted Divine Command Theory
In the Euthyphro dilemma, Socrates questions how Euthyphro can be so certain of what actions are considered pious. Socrates asks Euthyphro the important question if “Gods love piety because it is pious, or is it pious because they love it?” (Timmons 27) Put simply, are God’s commands right because God commanded them or did God command them because they are right? In what follows, I will explain what unrestricted divine command theory tries to accomplish, why Euthyphro’s dilemma poses a few significant problems to its views, and I will argue how embracing a restricted version of divine command theory can help avoid the obstacles the dilemma sets in place. It can be well argued that the unrestricted divine command theory is aimed to explain what is right and good depending on God’s commands. To understand the unrestricted divine command theory, one must understand the Theory of Right Conduct, which encompasses the nature of what makes an action right or wrong, and the Theory of Value, which helps explain intrinsic goodness and badness in relation to God’s commands. Intrinsic means a thing has its value in itself or “as it is”. It does not represent value like a dollar bill, but is the value. The Theory of Right Conduct states “An action A is obligatory if and only if (and because) God commands that we A” (Timmons 24). An obligatory action is an action one should morally do and is often referred to as required. “An action A is wrong if …show more content…
This can be done as I have explained, by considering what is deemed right or wrong to be a “necessary” truth instead of being determined entirely by God commands. Therefore, adopting a restricted view of divine command theory can arguably avoid the issues that arise from Euthyphro’s
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Analyzing Jane Craig's Euthyphro Dilemma
    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analyzing Jane Craig's Euthyphro Dilemma

    By creating an alternative, the atypical Christian answer avoids the dilemma entirely by arguing that divine nature is the moral standard. It is the character of God which determines how God commands us to behave. This is also reinforced in Scripture, where we see the terms “holy” and “godliness” frequently used as synonyms for moral pious or piety. They are one and the same thing. And is further reinforced by Scott Rae, "Morality is not grounded ultimately in God 's commands, but in His character, which then expresses itself in His…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dialogue: Divine Command Theory and Gods
    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dialogue: Divine Command Theory and Gods

    Socrates rises the dilemma about what pious is and do the gods love something because it is pious, or is something pious because the gods love it? Socrates and Euthyphro both agree that surely the gods love the pious because it is the pious. But than Socrates argues that we are forced to reject the second option: the fact that the gods love (something) cannot explain why the pious is the pious. This is because, if both options were true, they would go in circles with the gods loving the pious because it is the pious, and the pious being the pious because the gods love it. And this in turn means, Socrates argues, that the pious is not the same as the god-beloved, because what makes the pious the pious is not what makes the god-beloved the god-beloved. After all, what makes the god-beloved the god-beloved is the fact that the gods love it, whereas what makes the pious the pious is something else. Thus Euthyphro's theory does not give us the very nature of the pious.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nietzsche's Moral Framework Of Morality Essay
    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nietzsche's Moral Framework Of Morality Essay

    Another issue with any divine command morality theory is that we have no confirmation that there even is the essential God, a great deal less which God's commands are the commands of that God. There are many distinctive moral frameworks credited to God. This is so even inside of the umbrella of Christian belief in a higher power; more so when we consider different belief…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Euthyphro's Definition Of Piety
    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Euthyphro's Definition Of Piety

    Piety, says Euthyphro, is what all the gods love, and the impious is what all the gods hate. Socrates is not satisfied by this definition, either, and so he tries a different tack to extract a definition from Euthyphro. Socrates does this by asking: “Is the pious being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by the gods?” When Euthyphro seems unsure, Socrates simplifies his question with an analogy. He asks Euthyphro if something is “carried” because it is “a thing carried,” or if it is “carried” because something is carrying it. Both men agree that the action confers the state of being. That is, a thing loved is so because someone loves it, and the thing itself is not creating a state of “loving” within the people around it. Likewise, being loved is not a state inherent to the thing loved, but is the result of the love others bear for the thing. Moving from his analogy back to Euthyphro’s definition, Socrates shows the fallacy in Euthyphro’s statement. Being god-loved cannot confer piety, as it confers “god-loved-ness” instead. Therefore, in Euthyphro’s statement, all the gods loving something would make that thing universally god-loved, but in no way makes it pious. An act is loved by the gods because it is pious, and not the other way…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On The Euthyphro Dilemma
    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Essay On The Euthyphro Dilemma

    Tough some people might see an issue with this position, Rachels defends his positions with some explanations. One explanation that Rachels give is that, “God commands us to do certain things because they are right.” (Rachels 53). He says that God is wise and he knows what is good and what is not good, therefore, he commands us to do the things that are right and better for us. For example, he states, “ God, who is infinitely wise, recognizes that truthfulness is better than deceitfulness, and so then he commands us to be truthful.” (Rachels 53). As he explains, God knows what is better for us to do and therefore, the things that he knows are better are the things he commands us to do. God does not command us to do what is wrong, he does not command us to do random things, and “his commands are the results of his wisdom.” (Rachels 54). Therefore, God is wise and right and the things he commands are right because he commands them and he will simply not command us to do the wrong thing because his commands are not random, but the result of his…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Theological Voluntarism: The Divine Command Theory
    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Theological Voluntarism: The Divine Command Theory

    To follow these one accepts all moral and immoral statements assigned by their “God” in complete staidness. The Divine Command theory is not a mere suggestion made by a divine being; it is instead a requirement one must live by, since awareness of morality is knowledge in the distinction between evil and good. To live against one’s belief is to not entirely believe in it, or to rebel against one’s faith or “God”. For Divine Command Theory to be unquestionable, a divine being must exist.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Conceptual Framework Of Piety Glory
    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Conceptual Framework Of Piety Glory

    After meeting with Dr. Loebenberg, it came to my attention that my argument to the relationship of piety, glory, and moral responsibility lacked a conceptual framework. This framework should have addressed the relationship and provided a “backbone” to the argument that would create an effective platform for reasoning. The idea behind the conceptual framework should have been an overarching concept that supported my argument: Glory received by pious mortals and their interactions with their Gods served as an incentive to be piety in their society. My paper’s argument follows up with a declaration of this relationship and the result: a lower level of free will. Due to the increased involvement of a divine authority, the moral responsibility of…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Deontology
    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Deontology

    To start with, we have through and through freedom. What are we expected to do with it if not settle on our own choices? That is one contention. Second, imagine a scenario in which the Holy Book is somewhat questionable, for sure if two researchers differ about what God really implies. Once more, we have a circumstance in which the individual needs to settle on a choice. At long last, there is a contrast between being devoted - doing what you are told - and being moral - doing what you believe is correct. On the off chance that you are basically being respectful, you can't claim to be moral. So simply doing what God says may not be as simple as it appears.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    God's Responsibility for the Fall of Man
    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    God's Responsibility for the Fall of Man

    Within Literature, an unofficial definition for human wrongdoing has been connected to Adam and Eve’s expulsion from Eden. Their incompetence of following God’s orders, resulting in the punishment of mankind, has been thoroughly outlined within the text of the Bible. Yet are their actions truly of their own? God’s inept decision creating man within his image and His disdain leadership left human beings in a inferior position to disobey his orders, leaving him solely to blame for their ignorant actions.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Four Schools of Thought
    • 3070 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Four Schools of Thought

    In today’s fast-paced business environment, there is a greater emphasis placed on ethics training as companies seek to comply with regulatory requirements and improve business efficiency. Ethics picks up where the law leaves off, providing more than just the moral minimum to avoid intentional harm. When studying ethics, the variety of ethical theories offers different approaches to solving dilemmas. There are four schools of ethical thought, which include deontology, utilitarianism, existentialism and theism. This paper will entail its readers to understand the thinking behind each school of thought and also further understand the conflicts, which arises in our lives while dealing with people who think differently then we do. Moreover, the understanding of four schools of thought will enable the readers to deal wit people, in different schools of thought, when conflict arises.…

    • 3070 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Divine Command Theory
    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Divine Command Theory

    One of the fundamental notions involving morality has been its connection with religion. With morality being defined as a set of norms, we need someone with authority to create these moral laws. In that, moral law like any other regular law requires a lawmaker. Yet, humans lack the authority to create moral law, since humans are imperfect. Thus, if humans cannot be the author of moral law, then a higher power is required, God. With this notion, the Divine Command theory constructs the idea that when something is morally obligatory it’s only because God commands it, and when something is morally wrong it’s only because God forbids it. The strength of this theory lies with the universally recognize power of God’s commands, regardless of local…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Religion and Morality (Does Morality Depend on Religion?)
    • 2256 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Religion and Morality (Does Morality Depend on Religion?)

    * Nielson objects to the line of reasoning that most people hold that an action is right or wrong because God has so willed it, and we know God has so willed an action right or wrong because God has so willed it, and we know God has so willed an action right or wrong because it is stated in Scripture.…

    • 2256 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Divine Command Theory And Kant's Deontological Ethics
    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    Divine Command Theory And Kant's Deontological Ethics

    Today I learned about two moral theories, Divine Command Theory and Kant's deontological ethics. Divine Command theory is a non consequential normative theory that says we should always do what God commands; the view that actions are morally right if God commands or permits them, and morally wrong if and only if God forbids them. The second version of Kant’s Categorical Imperative says that every human being is an end in himself—a person whose capacity to choose for himself must be respected—so we should not use people only as means to achieve our own goals but should always at the same time treat them as ends in themselves—as persons whose capacity to choose for themselves must be respected. The moral theory that I think has the strongest…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    As clearly and carefully as you can
    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As clearly and carefully as you can

    Voluntarists are the people who insist that it is the will or the attitude of god that determines morality and its qualities, while the non-voluntarists argue that moral properties depend on their nature and that these exist without god’s existence. With the argument of god’s will and thus the morality, voluntarists centralize their position on the notion that morality depends on religion. That is, moral values consist in God’s attitude. On the contrary, non-voluntarists don’t presuppose a god. Although non-voluntarists deny theism and a metaphysical role of the god in morality, which the voluntarists agree on, they don’t reject that god play an epistemic role, which god telling us reliably what is morally good and bad, or motivational role in morality, which god providing divine incentives for moral behavior. The logic behind voluntarism and naturalism can be explained using Socrates’ label. Voluntarism argues that something is pious, because the god loves it, while non-voluntarists argue that something is loved by the gods, because it is pious. Voluntarists put strong focus on god’s will that determines what is piety or not while non voluntarists think it is the very nature that determines piety of something. What Brink argues in his essay “The Autonomy of Ethics” is that non-voluntarists seek the autonomy of morality, a notion that implies that the objectivity of ethics demand the autonomy of…

    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Divine Command Theory Essay
    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Divine Command Theory Essay

    The view that moral rules are true by virtue of being commanded by God is called the divine command theory. It is a deontological theory and claims that sentences such as "charity is good" mean the same thing as sentences such as "God commands charity”. If you believe that moral actions are good or bad because they are commanded or forbidden, certain things must follow. First, if they had not been commanded or forbidden by God then they wouldn’t have been good or bad. Secondly, if God has said the opposite to what he did in fact say, then the things that would have been good are now bad and vice versa. If God said “Hate your neighbour”, then that indeed would be the Christian and Jewish code of behaviour. This makes the moral codes appear somewhat arbitrary and brings up Plato’s question of “Is x good because God loves it or does God love x because x is good?”…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics