Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Euthanasia: the Right to Die V. the Right to Live

Good Essays
1579 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthanasia: the Right to Die V. the Right to Live
The topic I chose is Euthanasia. Euthanasia has two sides, a positive and a negative, which I will discuss and elaborate on.
Euthanasia is often called “mercy killing”. It is intentionally making someone die, rather than allowing that person to die naturally. It is sometimes the act of ending someone’s life, who is terminally ill, or is suffering in severe pain. Euthanasia is mostly illegal in the world today. Euthanasia can be considered a form of suicide, if the person afflicted with the problem actively does it. The person volunteering to commit the act to that person can also consider it a form of murder.
The positive side of Euthanasia is that it ends a person’s suffering in this world. Many physicians and psychiatrists believe that it is a humane act. From a virtue ethics point of view, it may be appropriate. What we seek in human existence is to be happy, and find happiness. Suffering from a terminal illness, or affliction, could inhibit one’s happiness in life (n.a.). If the goal is to be happy, then Euthanasia would be an answer for this person. Euthanasia may even bring about happiness in that it is what the person desires and wants, in order to no longer be a burden to his/her family. Also, Euthanasia would stop the pain and not prolong the dying process.
We ask for the right for assistance to die when life becomes unbearable. We ask for the right to determine for ourselves what unbearable means. Since suffering is subjective, how can anyone but the patient decide just how much suffering is too much? Is it that arrogant to think you can make that decision for someone else? It is heartless to think you can make up a rule that says no amount of suffering is too much. If you are not the one doing the suffering, then you have no right to enforce such a rule. In the utilitarian point of view we all have a duty to our happiness, and a duty to the society (Staff). Euthanizing a person based on the society aspect makes sense. With greater and greater emphasis put on managed care today, many doctors are at a financial risk when they provide treatments to patients who are in the dying process. These patients may also feel like not becoming a burden to the society at large, and choose to fulfill a duty Euthanasia. If the person is in a coma or is brain dead, that person is no use to himself or herself, or society anymore. Euthanasia is a viable method to end an otherwise futile attempt at recovery. The family of the person being euthanized may not want their family members in pain to suffer. It can be a family duty to do the right thing for the person and society. Depression, family conflict, feelings of abandonment, and hopelessness, are emotional burdens on family members seeing a person suffer. Committing euthanasia may be the humane act to do for the afflicted family member in this case (Lockwood). The euthanized person may even be of use to society in a utilitarian manner, if his/her bodily organs are to promote the welfare of others, one life saves the lives of others. This may even be considered a virtuous act, and possibly even altruistic in it not being of self-interest. It is the betterment of his/her fellow human kind in helping others in one final gracious act. The benefits are numerous in that the person euthanized would cease suffering, and the families would begin the healing process from grief and/or depression from the situation. Some people believe that, the person volunteering for euthanasia has a liberty to do what he/she wants. If the person does not cause harm to others, it is the person’s right, or liberty, to do what they please. If a person wants euthanasia, then that person has the sole liberties to choose such an act, and depart society and life. Nobody is being other than the person wishing it, and it is a volunteered act (Lavi). Killing human beings is wrong, because it injures that person and goes against the preferences of self-preservation. However, the above is not present in the issue of euthanasia, so it may be permissible, not all killing is injury, so not all killing is wrong. One should pay attention to one’s expressed wishes. Euthanasia could be considered doing a person a favor, because you cannot injure something if you are relieving it of pain. The negative side of euthanasia is that it goes against natural law ethics, because we do not let nature take its course. We are disturbing what is occurring or happening naturally to the person. Every person has a natural inclination to continue living. It is also said that euthanasia denies us the dignity of dying like human beings. If euthanasia were to become legal, it would form a downward spiral of society. For example, euthanasia would be self-inflicted by the individual, and then it would be administered and inflicted by others. Then others who simply have knowledge of the situation would administer the euthanasia. Finally, anyone would have an involvement in the euthanasia process making a decision to end a person’s existence. If a person’s life is deemed less valuable than another’s life, then euthanasia may rage out of control. People simply deemed unworthy or invaluable of living would be extinguished, and that may lead to genocide . Euthanasia goes against the six prima facie duties . There can be no duty of self-improvement if you prematurely end your existence. By not allowing yourself to die naturally, you deny yourself the final stages of growth in the dying process denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. Patients grow in the final stages, and finish all unfinished business. To administer euthanasia would deny a person this growth needed. Suicide is a tragic, individual act. Euthanasia is not about a private act. It is about letting a person facilitate the death of another. This can be a very public concern since it can lead to tremendous abuse for the most vulnerable people around us (n.a.). If euthanasia were to become law, the law would not give rights to the person who dies, but to the person doing the killing. In other words, euthanasia is not about a right to die, it is about a right to kill. Thus, if assisting suicide for those with terminal illness is legalized, the so-called “right to die” is very likely in practice to become a “duty to die”. The Kantian perspective is that you cannot go against perfect duties, even in society. According to the categorical imperative, if you act on a maxim which one can will to become a universal law then it can become law. If euthanasia were to become a standard act, it would be a common law. Another part of the categorical imperative is to act in such a way that you always treat humanity as an end never as a means. Treat humanity always at the same time as an end. All rational beings and persons are in themselves ends, and have infinite/absolute worth. Human beings would then have value, and euthanasia is a way not to always treat a person as an end. I believe euthanasia is wrong. USA Today reported that among older people suffering from terminal illness who attempt euthanasia/suicide, the number suffering from depression reaches almost 90%. Many people consider euthanasia/suicide primarily because they are pressured into seeing themselves as burdens on their families and society.
Euthanasia’s proponents claim that euthanasia should be considered a medical treatment. If one accepts the notion that euthanasia is good, then it would not only be inappropriate, but discriminatory. To deny this “good” to a person solely on the basis of that person’s being too young or too mentally incapacitated to make the request (Staff). Legalized euthanasia raises the potential for a potentially dangerous situation. Doctors could find themselves better off financially if a seriously ill, or disabled person, chooses to die rather than receive long term care. I think euthanasia goes against the natural law inclination to survive, and that we must do what we can for self-preservation. If we begin to deem certain situations and conditions unworthy of living, there may be no need to improve the quality of life or medical care. Why bother?
There are many avenues available in the medical world for pain relief, and there are procedures to ease the pain and suffering. Hospice is one medical avenue to consider if you are terminally ill. Euthanasia is not the answer to a bad situation. There is hope, help, and advances in medical technology everyday. To deny yourself the life you have been given is sad, but there are ways to succeed from depression and the pain from suffering.

Bibliography
Lavi, Shai. How Dying became a 'Life Crisis'. Vol. 137. Doedalus, 2007. 1 vols.
Lockwood, Frank E. Choosing to Die. 24 June 2001. >.
n.a. "Euthanasia." 2004. The Hutchinson Dictionary of Ideas. >.
Staff, ProQuest. Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Timeline. 2008. .
"Utilitarian." Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House, Inc. 10 Oct. 2008. .
"Genocide." Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House, Inc. 10 Oct. 2008. .
"Prima facie duties." Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House, Inc. 10 Oct. 2008. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia not only gives the patient the opportunity to stop their suffering, it also gives them autonomy. According to Thomas Preston, professor of medicine, a retired cardiologist and a former board member of Compassion in Dying “society must protect the right of terminally ill patients to choose euthanasia.” (Euthanasia 53) By euthanasia being legal, we have been unconsciously giving the patient the autonomy of whether they want to continue living or not. We as human beings can only perceive the outside of a person, however, we could never really know what they may be going through or suffering. Sometimes, individuals are so self-centered that would prefer to have their loved ones alive and in pain than giving them the freedom to choose between life and death. After all, each person is the owner of his or her life and should be able to decide what is best for them.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia is known by different terms such as mercy killing, assisted suicide, etc. It is the act of assisting someone in his or her own death who is terminally ill, suffering, and in great pain. The goal of the assisted suicide is to prevent the continuation of pain.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In at least some cases, active euthanasia promotes the best interest of everyone concerned and violates no one’s rights, therefore, at least in some cases, active euthanasia is morally permissible.” (RSL/Rachels, EL 249) This is the strongest argument for active euthanasia in my opinion. Those who oppose this argument may claim that euthanasia is not in the best interests of all parties involved. The parties referenced are usually the friends/family/doctors and their grief over the situation or even the hospital and its shareholders losing money from the patient. First off, any person who wants to keep a family member alive who is in extreme pain for the sole reason of wanting to prolong being able to interact with them or to offset their own period of suffering following the family member’s death is incredibly selfish. The logical conclusion would be that family and friends of the patient would be relieved by their quick and early passing because of the avoidance of a month of suffering. Yes, of course the family and friends of the patient will experience emotional trauma from the passing of their loved one, but in due time the loved one you will pass whether they like it or not. Second, when it comes to financial losses to the hospital and its shareholders, those who would put monetary gain over the wellbeing of another human being have…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics of Euthanasia

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Stephanie Clayton. "This House Believes that assisted suicide should be legalized." idebate.org. 16 Feb 2012. idebate.org, Web. 26 Oct 2012. http://idebate.org/debatabase/debates/philosophy/house-believes-assisted-suicide-should-be-legalized…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several reasons why Euthanasia is wrong. I’m just going to name a few. First is because it doesn’t just effect the person choosing it, it also effects the family of the person choosing assisted suicide . Also another reason that euthanasia is wrong is because if you do choose assisted suicide you never know what’s going to happen after that moment. For all that you know it could get a whole lot better than what you are at that moment. The last but definitely not least is that Euthanasia denies the patients the final stage of growth.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To sum it all up, euthanasia should be allowed. One has the power of their life. Especially when it is causing them pain and the people around them. Having to either pay for another ill person in result to their family being ill when they are in pain can get very expensive. There are people who need the help and the money more than the people who only have a few months…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Living Wills

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is euthanasia? Euthanasia is not mercy killing. It has absolutely nothing to do with killing. On the contrary, euthanasia by definition simply means "good death" and in the applied sense it refers to…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that euthanasia has its place in society. While I do not condone murder, I believe if a person is dying from an incurable disease or is in a persistent vegetative state where there is no chance of recovery, allowing that person to die painlessly and with dignity is more moral than not doing so. Although human life is a precious gift from God, I feel that it would be the duty of the patients ' family and doctors to take all the information about the health of the patient and make the best decision for their loved one, even if the end result means the death of that person.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia, “also called mercy killing. The act of putting to death painlessly or allowing to die,as by withholding extreme medical measures, a person or animal suffering from incurable ,especially painful,disease or condition.” (Dictionary) . Physician assisted suicide is a personal choice patients in great pain chose to find relief. By law in most places of the world, it is illegal for a doctor to take part in helping someone end their own life. A doctor or physician can go to jail for many years or possibly even for life for doing what their jobs are supposed to be dedicated to - helping people. It should be common sense to realize it is one’s own civil right to decide what to do with his or her own body, life, and fate. If a person would…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The medical use of euthanasia has been one the most highly debated topics in healthcare for many years. Should you be able to decide when you want to die? Should physicians help patients who no longer wish to live die? To help gain insight into this highly controversial and fascinating topic, I have chosen an article from Santa Clara University. In this article, the author gave a beautiful example of an acceptable situation in which I believe euthanasia can be used. He explained that his first wife was dying of inoperable bone cancer. She had thrombosis, broken bones, and no longer had any control over her bowels. It was no longer a question of if she was going to die; it was a question of when. She had been suffering for two years and could no longer withstand the pain of her terminal illness. The authors have lobbied for a new law that would allow the use of euthanasia in the treatment of patients suffering from terminal diseases. Under their law, two different physicians would have to both determine that patient is dying from a terminal disease that can not be cured or successfully treated. As stated by one of the authors, Derek Humphry; “It’s me. It’s my body. It’s my liberty. It’s my life. And it’s my death. Let me have control.” If we have given patients the right to refuse feeding tubes and other life saving measures then why should they be stripped of the right to end their unbearable suffering. The biggest principle surround the use of euthanasia is autonomy, the right to self-determination. Some individuals argue that autonomy gives you the freedom to have another person intervene to take your life, while others argue that taking one’s life is a contraindication of autonomy as you are giving away your freedom. There is no doubt that this topic will be debated for many years to come. I personally believe that an individual suffering a terminal disease should be given the right…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The term, ‘Euthanasia' comes from the Greek words eu meaning good, and thanatos meaning death, and is known as mercy killing or assisted suicide, usually practiced on a terminally ill person. In some countries, euthanasia is legal and a third person can assist suicide under certain conditions. Many religions and medical practitioners opposed the idea of euthanasia and strongly claimed it to be illegal. The debate on euthanasia is expected to continue in the future because there are both pros and cons to euthanasia. (Sandhyarani, 2011)…

    • 2463 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia ( Assisted Suicide) is the practice of intentionally and directly ending the life of the life of a person who has a severe and incurable disease or medical condition (Wolf, Susan M.) Euthanasia (Assisted Suicide) has been around for thousands…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The subject of euthanasia, passive or otherwise, brings up controversial feelings. Passive euthanasia, or the letting nature take its course approach with no extraordinary measures taken to preserve life, is commonly accepted with minimal outrage. Generally, only extremists take a stance against this practice. Active euthanasia however strikes a chord within people that put us at odds not only with each other but within ourselves as well. It is important to understand that active euthanasia in this essay is characterized by the intentional act of ending your own or someone else’s life when terminal illness presents itself. I myself believe that the practice of active euthanasia should be made available but there is much work to be done on defining when it is appropriate. J. Gay-Williams spoke against active euthanasia in his article titled “The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia”. The title alone leaves little guesswork as far as what his beliefs are. He claims an understanding of why we lean towards more acceptance of this practice but remains convinced that our beliefs are misplaced for three very distinct, compelling yet simple reasons. In my essay, I will discuss and critique his first two lines of logic; 1) the argument from nature and 2) the argument from self-interest.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ethical argument – that people should have freedom of choice, including the right to control their own body and life (as long as they do not abuse any other person’s rights), and that the state should not create laws that prevent people being able to choose when and how they die…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia Is Not Murder

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mercy killing is also called euthanasia. This is a way of ending a person’s life by lethal injection or extraordinary medical treatment to the person that is suffering from an untreatable disease. It is an easy, quiet and painless death (Saunders 2007). There are three kinds of euthanasia, voluntary euthanasia, non-voluntary, and involuntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia is when the person who is killed has requested to be killed, and this is based on the person own will. Non-voluntary euthanasia is when the person who is killed made no request and gave no consent. Involuntary euthanasia is when the person is killed but against his or her wishes (Eow BH 2002). Now that there is four places that legal euthanasia or assisted suicide, they are Netherlands, Belgium, Oregon and Washington. Although there are some people who believe that mercy killing is not merciful and it is murder. But mercy killing can bring about many advantages such as release people from suffering, respect the living wills of a person and give the chances to other people that still have hope.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays