Preview

Euthanasia: Mercy or Crime?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1584 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthanasia: Mercy or Crime?
Euthanasia: Mercy or Crime?
Euthanasia, has long been a highly touchy and debatable issue in many fields. Although the lives of many patients can be saved through new breakthroughs in treatment and technology, mankind is still unable to find the cure for many illnesses. Even with all the money in the world, patients who suffer from chronic diseases and illnesses are forced to go through the struggles of physical pain. They have no other choice but to bear with their suffering. Supporters of euthanasia maintain that people should have the right to decide to end their lives through the best means possible to eliminate pain and suffering. But is this truly ethical and acceptable? I am strongly against euthanasia it is completely unethical and morally unacceptable in both the religious and secular world. Any active act of euthanasia, whether voluntary or involuntary, should not be allowed because it undermines the sanctity of human life.
The definition of euthanasia is the termination of a sick person’s life to relieve him of his suffering. Also known as mercy killing, euthanasia is not natural at all. It is not about dying of natural causes. Rather, it is the ending of a person’s life deliberately. Do we as humans have the right to choose when and how to end our own lives? First, we have to realize the value of human life. The Catholic Church teaches that human life is sacred and the taking of any innocent life is immoral and sinful. Of course, it is arguable that no one should deserve to undergo a long, painful death, but there are always other alternatives to euthanasia. The Church believes that the sick should be given treatment and the dying should be comforted. Those who are suffering from illnesses have the option of palliative care. The great advancements in the medical field have provided us with a variety of pain relieving treatments and medications. These options should be taken advantage of in order to relieve the pain of suffering patients.
Those



References: Benjamin, H., & Gumpert, M. (2009). Euthanasia – Pro and Con. The Nation. Munkittrick, K. (2011). Euthanasia, Immortality, and The Natural Death Paradox. Discover Magazine. Truman, M. (2000). Euthanasia Frequently Goes Awry. Chicago Tribune.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia is a social issue in today’s world because not only does it affect the lives of those who are terminally ill and/or comatose, and the physicians who have been entrusted with their care, but it also affects the patient’s ability to have control over their own life, whether they are aware of this decision or not, which is one of the reasons why euthanasia has become such a controversial issue around the globe. Caddell and Newton (1995) define euthanasia as “any treatment initiated by a physician with the intent of hastening the death of another human being who is terminally ill and in severe pain or distress with the motive of relieving that person from great suffering” (p. 1,672). Even though the concept of great…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia is the practice of mercifully ending a person 's life in order to free someone from a deadly disease. The Greek word “Euthanasia” simply means “good death”. This refers to the intentional ending of a person or animal’s life to relieve suffering and pain. It is also known as “Mercy Killing”. It is a serious ethical and political issue in today’s society because it goes against the norms of traditional medicine. It is so, because some people define euthanasia as a form of suicide. However, some people actually think that it is a choice that concerns the quality of life. In fact, people have different standards regarding the worth of life. Others believe that being clinically alive is enough to say that a person should live, but for others, it is simply inadequate. If a person’s life is lacking in self awareness or intrinsic presence as a human being, due to extreme physical or mental suffering, then that person should be able to choose a dignified death rather than an undignified existence. This is evident because of moral conscience, social bias or pressure, and financial situations. It is portrayed that nurture or environmental factors plays a role that make euthanasia more appealing. In short, some people tend to disregard the moral and ethical values of life when they see a person suffering. Indeed, despite of the moral and ethical issues that contradict the concept of euthanasia, there are certain factors it impacts society positively, which leads it to be more socially acceptable.…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics of Euthanasia

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the most hotly debated topics going on through the government is the one concerning the ethics of euthanasia also known as assisted suicide. Euthanasia comes from the Greek language meaning ‘Good death’. Euthanasia is suicide, but with the help of a doctor. The government and people argue about whether it should be legalized or not, this is because it can be seen as unethical and it taking the ills life. I think assisted suicide should be legal because we have the right and moral obligation to euthanize our beloved pets when they are suffering and in pain... why are we not morally obligated to provide the same options for ourselves and our loved ones who have no quality of life? Euthanasia fascinates me because not much people of my age are aware of what it is exactly and how much that it could actually help out in the society if it was to be legalized. Euthanasia should be legalized we have ‘the peoples rights’, it cost more to keep someone on life support and it is a way out of unnecessary suffering for the ill.…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Euthanasia”, “mercy killing”, and “physically assisted suicide” – no matter what it is called – they all mean the same thing: ending a person’s life who is in a vegetative state or who is suffering from terminal illness, in order to relieve the subject of pain and suffering associated with their condition. But the main question is, is euthanasia right? Everyone dies, and if a person is terminally ill, then they should have the right to decide to pass away without the suffering.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is euthanasia, or assisted suicide, humane? Should it be accepted in the medical world? Euthanasia is a very serious ethical dilemma faced in modern health care. Euthanasia is mostly a matter of opinion, and has different meanings to different people. In my opinion, there are many good arguments supporting euthanasia but I believe euthanasia should be ignored. I would personally never be able to perform euthanasia on someone, I would feel too guilty, but not everyone feels the same way.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that euthanasia has its place in society. While I do not condone murder, I believe if a person is dying from an incurable disease or is in a persistent vegetative state where there is no chance of recovery, allowing that person to die painlessly and with dignity is more moral than not doing so. Although human life is a precious gift from God, I feel that it would be the duty of the patients ' family and doctors to take all the information about the health of the patient and make the best decision for their loved one, even if the end result means the death of that person.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The medical use of euthanasia has been one the most highly debated topics in healthcare for many years. Should you be able to decide when you want to die? Should physicians help patients who no longer wish to live die? To help gain insight into this highly controversial and fascinating topic, I have chosen an article from Santa Clara University. In this article, the author gave a beautiful example of an acceptable situation in which I believe euthanasia can be used. He explained that his first wife was dying of inoperable bone cancer. She had thrombosis, broken bones, and no longer had any control over her bowels. It was no longer a question of if she was going to die; it was a question of when. She had been suffering for two years and could no longer withstand the pain of her terminal illness. The authors have lobbied for a new law that would allow the use of euthanasia in the treatment of patients suffering from terminal diseases. Under their law, two different physicians would have to both determine that patient is dying from a terminal disease that can not be cured or successfully treated. As stated by one of the authors, Derek Humphry; “It’s me. It’s my body. It’s my liberty. It’s my life. And it’s my death. Let me have control.” If we have given patients the right to refuse feeding tubes and other life saving measures then why should they be stripped of the right to end their unbearable suffering. The biggest principle surround the use of euthanasia is autonomy, the right to self-determination. Some individuals argue that autonomy gives you the freedom to have another person intervene to take your life, while others argue that taking one’s life is a contraindication of autonomy as you are giving away your freedom. There is no doubt that this topic will be debated for many years to come. I personally believe that an individual suffering a terminal disease should be given the right…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The term euthanasia originated from the Greek word for ‘good death’. It is the act or practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the suspension of medical treatment. Because of this many view euthanasia as simply bringing relief by alleviating pain and suffering” (1). I strongly agree in legalizing euthanasia in our society, and I will be applying the ethical doctrine Utilitarianism to defend my case. Euthanasia minimizes the suffering that affects those involved. Euthanasia is already legal in Holland, Luxembourg and Belgium, and permitted in Switzerland if performed by a non-doctor. In the US, the State of Washington, Montana, and Oregon have already passed laws in support of euthanasia while a recent Gallop poll finds that the vast majority of Americans continue to support "right-to-die" laws for terminally ill patients. The following benefits to legalizing euthanasia are: patients’ are saved from unwanted suffering, free up the nurses and doctors time for savable patients, vital organs can be saved, allowing doctors to save the lives of others, and health care cost would be reduced.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The arguments opposing the legalization of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide include a wide range of varying ideals. There are those who are against these practices for religious reasons, the act of suicide or the taking of a life are viewed as Mortal, unforgivable, sins. Those who have philosophical notions that conflict with the basic idea of taking a life, and even those that worry these practices could somehow lead to Nazi like genocide. The most common arguments against the legalization of these practices are called the “Slippery Slope”, the fear that the allowance of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide would lead to an unacceptable abuse of the process and push us toward the unthinkable, involuntary euthanasia.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    duties: 1. the duty not to cause further pain or suffering; and 2. the duty to…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rachels, J. (1975) Active and passive euthanasia . The New England Journal of Medicine 292 78-80…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Merriam-Webster Dictionary of 2004 defines euthanasia as the act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from terminal illness or an incurable condition as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment. But how could anyone pick a side on this topic? You either think it is all right or not right at all. The sides of this debate are equally divided, and both make good points that come with it.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bioethics of Euthanasia

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages

    As biological organisms, humans design patterns of how to live by way of autonomous lifestyle choices, only after being born into a subjective realm of existence with social opportunities and limitations suggested by how one is nurtured and raised. A sense of a connection to objectivity is gained depending on how closely one associates themselves with an organized institution such as religion, or other form of moral code. The idea that knowledge learned from a moral superior at a young age can suggest, or sometimes in early adulthood, coerce decision-making is indicative of a set of parameters or expectations that one must achieve so to honor the objective family belief. Therefore, the family is also an institution which generates the same attachment to objectivity that encourages a certain set of goals. Ultimately though, it is one’s subjective experience that has it’s own social, physical, mental, and spiritual habits and attachments that cause the mind and body to perform and exist in a particular way. The overarching illegality of euthanasia across North America is supported by religious institutions which act as the sole moral platform for questioning the professional conduct of medical practitioners. The hegemonic belief that is fostered views euthanasia as a breach of non-maleficence, though doctors have and will likely continue to comply with life-ending aid in North America, regardless of recent deliberation regarding legislation. A legalization of euthanasia could ease tensions for physicians and patients dealing with chronic fatal health conditions, but would require specific criteria for legality. The debilitating suffering from a terminal illness should be the first criteria, as well as an autonomous request made by the sufficiently competent patient. Those who advocate for the legalization of euthanasia are part of a particular morality that sees beyond the mystical value of medical non-maleficence and opposes overarching institutional moralities that…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal vs Imorral

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Euthanasia is legal but is it immoral? Probably most of us have had experiences with friends or relatives who suffered greatly towards the end of their lives. In my opinion, there are limits to how far modern medicine can go alleviating this pain. I believe that euthanasia is morally wrong. The problem with this is that it puts happiness vs. suffering ahead of life itself. Arguments in favor of euthanasia seem to imply that life is only worth living if one is happy. The truth is that everyone suffers in life and we have the ability to endure it through positive thinking and focus. Those who want to commit suicide or to assist others in suicide are probably focusing too much on the suffering. Of course we all die eventually, but even a few more years is given the right determination and focus on the meaning of life. Friends and family of the terminally ill should never want them to die in order to end their suffering but should instead celebrate their lives and always keep in mind that the value of life is incomparably more important than happiness or suffering. Life is sacred and we should always seek to protect life and allow people to live until they die of natural causes.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia... Crime, or Not?

    • 1018 Words
    • 30 Pages

    When the elderly are released, their life is celebrated and they have an opportunity to spend time with friends before their death. Mercy killing prevents the old from contracting an illness. As they get older, the elders have decided that it is better to kill the old in peace rather than letting them become sick and die slowly and painfully and create a…

    • 1018 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays