Euthanasia Is Wrong Persuasive Essay
Millions of children around the world are living with terminal illnesses, which they fight every day to finally overcome. Some are successful, but others live their lives hooked up to machines or on treatments that lessen their quality of life. Children under the age of eighteen are considered unfit to make decisions regarding their own health care; therefore, the responsibility is in the hands of the parents or legal guardians of the child. What happens when the decisions are not in the best interest of the child, or if the child disagrees? This is where a physician and parent have to decide if they want their child’s life to be based on quantity or quality. Do they want the child to live a long life while being unhappy or a short life while
…show more content…
Minors are said to be unfit to make decisions that will majorly affect their life, but how can this be true when we have minors like Malala Yousafzai or Jaylen Bledsoe, who have done so much at such a young age, are seen as genius to the outside world. No one questions their right of mind while making decisions that affect their lives, so why is a child who is terminally-ill deemed less sane? In todays world, children are not taken seriously unless they accomplish something extraordinary. When ever a child voices an opinion about something they will usually be brushed off and told that the situation is to complex for their understanding. Children should be allowed to decide when to end treatment for terminal illnesses.
When it comes to terminal illness one bad decision will usually only yield two outcomes; life or death. This is the main reason as to why the responsibly it given to the parents of the child. A parent is expected to always do what is in the best interest of their child. They are supposedly the people who love and care for him/her the most, so why shouldn’t they be the ones to make decisions about their child’s treatment. A parent is assumed to be the best
Minors are said to be unfit to make decisions that will majorly affect their life, but how can this be true when we have minors like Malala Yousafzai or Jaylen Bledsoe, who have done so much at such a young age, are seen as genius to the outside world. No one questions their right of mind while making decisions that affect their lives, so why is a child who is terminally-ill deemed less sane? In todays world, children are not taken seriously unless they accomplish something extraordinary. When ever a child voices an opinion about something they will usually be brushed off and told that the situation is to complex for their understanding. Children should be allowed to decide when to end treatment for terminal illnesses.
When it comes to terminal illness one bad decision will usually only yield two outcomes; life or death. This is the main reason as to why the responsibly it given to the parents of the child. A parent is expected to always do what is in the best interest of their child. They are supposedly the people who love and care for him/her the most, so why shouldn’t they be the ones to make decisions about their child’s treatment. A parent is assumed to be the best