Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Euthanasia Debate - Opinion Piece

Good Essays
889 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthanasia Debate - Opinion Piece
It could be argued that the debate on Euthanasia is one of the most controversial issues of our time. All terminally ill patients have to deal with excruciating emotional and/or physical pain but some face the difficult decision as to whether or not they wish to take their lives. These patients not only have to deal with their personal suffering, but have to take into consideration how the choice of euthanasia will affect others around them. The article I have chosen highlights the debate and affects of Euthanasia and Physician Assisted suicides(PAS) across Australia and the rest of the world. The author gives light to the political side of the argument by discussing the proposed euthanasia bill for Tasmania, comparing it to the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act passed in the Northern Territory in 1995, that was later overturned by the Commonwealth in 1997.
I have sourced my article from George Williams, a Professor of Law from the University of New South Wales and a writer for The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper, published on: 27/02/2013.

I chose to research the topic of Euthanasia because the article represents the opinions and statements of both advocates and opponents of euthanasia therefore being non-biased. I was intrigued and fascinated by the arguments presented for and against euthanasia and how those opinions are interpreted in the medical and political industries. I am an advocate of euthanasia and personally believe that someone suffering physically and/or mentally should have the choice of whether they want to live or die. I believe that if euthanasia was to be passed in any new area, that strict boundaries would need to be put in place to regulate the degree in which it takes place. George Williams boldly states in the article that "Australians overwhelmingly believe that people with a terminal illness should be able to end their life with the assistance of a doctor." The evidence behind this statement is that the government has conducted a poll on the Australian public for many years. The most recent poll has proved that overall, eighty-two percent of Australians want to legalise voluntary euthanasia with lethal dose. Below shows the most recent poll results in each Australian state.

Image sourced from: Neil Francis(June, 2012)

Nationally, eighty-two per cent of respondents agreed a doctor should provide a lethal dose if requested by a “hopelessly ill patient, experiencing unbelievable suffering, with absolutely no chance of recovering” while thirteen per cent said disagreed. I would be interested to know exactly how many terminally ill patients in Australia were for euthanasia and their different reasoning's as to why. It would also be interesting to hear the reasoning's behind those people whom are against euthanasia. I found it alarming that it is legal for terminally ill patients to starve themselves to death by to not be allowed the choice to die pain free, with medical assistance.

In my opinion, the act of allowing euthanasia to end pain needs to be an upcoming government decision. Statistics support that many other Australians share this same opinion. The fact it is legal to put our pets to sleep when they suffer from a specific illness or from old age should be interpreted in a similar way to if our Grandparents become hopelessly ill. They do not get the choice to end their lives but must be kept alive in a hospital bed or in a nursing home waiting for the rest of their 'lives' until the day their body finally stops. This could be for days or many years. I personally see that as mere torture. I am not comparing an elderly person to a dog or a cat, but instead highlighting the fact that the morals behind voluntary euthanasia are very much the same. I do not see it as murder, I believe it is a personal right. I find it hard to understand why someone should have to live their life hooked up to numerous machines, riddled with painful cancers or paralysis.

I believe that if the government continue taking this issue seriously, they will gain stronger support amongst the community, helping them to succeed in the legalisation of euthanasia in Tasmania.
Tasmania would lead the nation, which would hopefully put pressure on the other members of parliament around the country to listen to the opinions of society and take action.

In order to transform my personal opinion into an academic opinion, I would need provide creditable, in-text sources and paraphrase when necessary. I would need to write in third-person form using formal language. I would need to relate to more than one article and research further in depth the advantages and disadvantages of euthanasia. I would need to provide multiple professional opinions and further evidence and more recent information regarding the topic.

REFERENCE LIST:

Francis, N. (2012). Support Euthanasia Poll. Retrieved from http://www.australianageingagenda.com.au/2012/12/06/article/Wide-support-for-euthanasia-poll/BZBAQTGAML.

Government, N. T. (1995). The Rights Of The Terminally Ill Act 1995. Retrieved from http://www.nt.gov.au/lant/parliamentary-business/committees/rotti/rotti95.pdf

George Williams, University of NSW (27/2/2013). Tasmania leads way on voluntary euthanasia. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/tasmania-leads-way-on-voluntary-euthanasia-20130226-2f3wt.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia is a social issue in today’s world because not only does it affect the lives of those who are terminally ill and/or comatose, and the physicians who have been entrusted with their care, but it also affects the patient’s ability to have control over their own life, whether they are aware of this decision or not, which is one of the reasons why euthanasia has become such a controversial issue around the globe. Caddell and Newton (1995) define euthanasia as “any treatment initiated by a physician with the intent of hastening the death of another human being who is terminally ill and in severe pain or distress with the motive of relieving that person from great suffering” (p. 1,672). Even though the concept of great…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept and practice of physician assisted suicide is a highly debated topic in today’s news. People often question the morals of the physicians who practice euthanasia and there are some who believe that they should not even be considered doctors. Euthanasia is the ending of someone's life through a doctor's help and is still illegal in most countries. One of the most well known advocates for the practice of euthanasia is Jack Kevorkian, who has also been referred to as Dr. Death. He was tried and convicted of second degree murder, however his practice gained a lot of support from the publicity of his trials. Although he is responsible for over 130 deaths, Kevorkian is a hero in today’s standards because of his involvement in the practice…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia in Canada

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There is considerable debate today, both among the public and the politicians, about euthanasia. While the governmnt is hesitatant to venture into morals and ethics, it appears that euthanasia is gaining more press coverage, in light of the Sue Rodriguez and Robert Latimer cases. Indeed, the issue is difficult to resolve, and despite few advances, the government has enacted penalties in the Criminal Code to punish assisted suicide. Without reservation, euthanasia is illegal in Canada. Anincreasing number of people are turning to doctor-assisted suicide. As a result of a more liberal political arena, more people are agreeing that some form of euthanasia must be acceptable in specific circumstances. Politicians, and the courts, claim that the country is not yet ready for such a climate. The characterization of pro-euthanasia advocates by their counterparts as selfish, taking the easy way out, diserespectful of life, and challenging human dignity is misconstrued. Pro-euthanasia groups advocate self-dignity, personal choice, economic well-being, happiness, family support, and individual rights. The word euthanasia simply means good death, but has come to mean causing death with intent, whether by doing something (commission), or by omitting something(omission). Euphemisms of the pro-euthanasia movement, include "right to die", and "death with dignity". The term "passive euthanasia" is often applied to the withdrawal of useless treatment thatonly prolonging the dying of a person. This needs to be differentiated from withdrawing of something that is actually keeping them alive, the withdrawl of which actually causes their death. It has been pointed out that the pro- life lobby will be split and discredited if there is an insistence by some that all technological means must be used whenever possible to prolong life. No ethical doctor insists on the use of burdensome, ineffective of futile measure, commonly called 'disproportionate', when refused by the patient or…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assisted Suicide

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Today’s doctors are now performing what is known as physician-assisted suicide, which is when a doctor sets up a machine, but the patient actually kills him or herself. The right to assisted suicide is a significant topic that concerns people all over the United States. The debates go back and forth about whether a dying patient has the right to die with the assistance of a physician. Some are against it because of religious and moral reasons, and some are for it because of their compassion and respect for the dying. Physicians also take a big role on this issue. They differ where they place the line that separates relief from dying--and killing. The main concern with assisted suicide lies with the competence of the terminally ill. Terminally ill patients who are in the final stages of their lives have requested doctors to aid them in exercising active euthanasia. It is sad to realize that these people are in great agony and that to them the only hope of bringing that agony to a halt is through assisted suicide. When people see the word euthanasia, they see the meaning of the word in two different lights. Euthanasia for some carries a negative connotation; it is the same as murder. However for others, euthanasia is the act of putting someone to death painlessly, or allowing a person suffering from an incurable and painful disease or condition to die by withholding extreme medical measures. But after studying both sides of the issue, a compassionate individual must conclude that competent terminal patients should be given the right to assisted suicide in order to end their suffering, reduce the damaging financial…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia is a widely debated and controversial topic in our society. It is believed that the principle of PAS and euthanasia portrays, “merciful acts that deliver terminally ill patients from painful and protracted death” (page 477, column 2). In the paper, “Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Tragic View,” John D. Arras discusses the subject and states that while he agrees with patients making decisions, implementing laws supporting PAS and euthanasia is a huge threat to our social order. However, John D. Arras also concludes that he does not disapprove with the possibility of having a legislative policy in favor of PAS/euthanasia, only if there is “sufficient evidence of reliability of various safeguards” (page 477, column 2).…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics of Euthanasia

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the most hotly debated topics going on through the government is the one concerning the ethics of euthanasia also known as assisted suicide. Euthanasia comes from the Greek language meaning ‘Good death’. Euthanasia is suicide, but with the help of a doctor. The government and people argue about whether it should be legalized or not, this is because it can be seen as unethical and it taking the ills life. I think assisted suicide should be legal because we have the right and moral obligation to euthanize our beloved pets when they are suffering and in pain... why are we not morally obligated to provide the same options for ourselves and our loved ones who have no quality of life? Euthanasia fascinates me because not much people of my age are aware of what it is exactly and how much that it could actually help out in the society if it was to be legalized. Euthanasia should be legalized we have ‘the peoples rights’, it cost more to keep someone on life support and it is a way out of unnecessary suffering for the ill.…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A hotly debated issue regarding the quality of life for terminally ill patients revolves around the morality and legal implications of euthanasia, or physician assisted suicide which is defined as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease, or in an irreversible coma. There are already a multitude of laws in place regulating physician assisted suicide in some states and countries, as well as laws preventing the practice. But despite these preventative laws physician assisted suicide remains an underground practice to relieve patient suffering. In lieu of the supposed moral issues associated with physician assisted suicide,…

    • 3211 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia is currently illegal in the UK and until 1961, so was suicide. Some people think that they are morally wrong and should not be encouraged. Some people debate that euthanasia, like suicide should be legalised because they are both one in the same. We should have the right to make our own decision about the time of our death. There are a lot of problems with this and in this essay I hope to explain them.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    People in Canada are diagnosed with terminal illness’ every day. They know when they are going to die and often suffer until then. Why can’t patients diagnosed with a terminal illness be given the option to be euthanized? It would allow such patients to die painlessly and peacefully instead of having to suffer. While currently illegal in all but five areas of the world, assisted suicide and euthanasia are quickly becoming a more prevalent topic globally with more and more countries looking at making the move to legalize the acts. It has been legalized nationally in countries such as the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Belgium while also being legalized in the states of Oregon and Washington in the United States of America. The article from the New England Journal of Medicine, Redefining Physicians` Role in Assisted Dying by Lisa Lehmann, uses the state of Oregon as a basis for much of her research and probing into both sides of the argument behind euthanasia. Margaret Somerville, a world renown ethicist and academic known for some of her controversial views, also gives her own insight into the topic in the article Legalized Euthanasia Only a Breath Away, published by the Globe and Mail. Somerville bases much of her argument around personal opinions and strong beliefs. I will examine the merits and proposals brought forth by each author and compare them to each other.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument that has sent the world into a tailspin is whether or not people suffering from terminal or excruciatingly painful illness have the right to take their own lives by way of physician-assisted suicide. Proponents contend that what one does with one 's life is of no consequence to anyone else -- that it is humane to allow someone to be relieved of constant – if not unbearable – discomfort. On the other hand, critics claim that the act of euthanasia is nothing more than a fabricated form of murder. Indeed, both sides have pertinent points when it comes to understanding and assessing the conflict, but euthanasia supporters have a significantly stronger argument when considering the bigger picture. Clearly, physician-assisted suicide is not only the right thing to do for someone seeking such a decision, but it is ethical and humane for a physician to abide by the patient 's wish.…

    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first aspect to consider is the moral perspective. Active euthanasia is now being viewed as a new alternative to ending one’s suffering. Those who support active euthanasia argue that a terminally ill patient who is in excruciating pain should be given the choice to decide whether or not one wants to live, claiming that it is the patient’s right. The situation is looked at as if the patient’s life is no longer valuable or worth living anymore, but who gets to be the judge…

    • 3029 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Euthanasia is often a controversial topic around all areas of the world. The idea of ‘assisted suicide’ has sparked debates and many countries, including Australia, are still hesitant or reluctant in allowing legislation for legalising Euthanasia to pass. This inquiry will aim to provide sufficient evidence as to why and how Euthanasia should become legalised while also evaluating and examining other cases and laws in other states regarding this topic.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first person to be legally voluntarily euthanised in Australia was Bob Dent in the Northern Territory, in the year of 1996. This controversial issue has raised many dilemmas throughout society, and so far it seems there is no clear solution. The implications of euthanasia will be discussed herein. Defining the issue and exploring both sides of the controversy has proven to be a difficult task.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The controversy of euthanasia has been comparable to an equally controversial topic: abortion. Both topics deal with medically assisted death - one with babies, and the other of terminally ill individuals. In both cases, people are accusing doctors of being “murderers”, which implies that the doctors issuing the life-ending drug are monsters (Source G). Furthermore, critics of euthanasia argue that some patients do not have the mental capability to make a decision, such as those suffering through dementia or other mental illnesses (Source F). However, all people should have the right to make their own choice about their life, and should be able to receive proper medical support with their decision. Euthanasia has shown to have many medical benefits, which clearly far outweigh the downsides. In Oregon, for example, the passing of the ODDA, an assisted suicide bill, has shown to have actually increased and bettered end of life care (Source C). In the end, euthanasia has unequivocal benefits, mainly medical and moral, that are far more important and significant than the minor…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays