euthanasia argumentative essay
Argumentative Essay
Euthanasia which is also known as mercy killing has been pronounced legal in many countries in the present day world. Euthanasia involves terminating the life of patients to relieve pain and suffering; which became intolerable. Euthanasia is not embraced by everyone, as some people tend to go against it on the grounds of religion and morality. As much as the euthanasia process painlessly puts a person to death, the responsibility of deciding who dies and who lives should not be left in the hands of a doctor. It is moral obligation for individuals and the society as a whole (including the doctors) to protect human life, thus euthanasia should not be legalized. Human life has great value , and thus should be preserved in all possible ways regardless of the circumstances, “ even when death is inevitable painful it is not considered merciful to prescribe an over dose to a cancer victim against her will, or go to gently smother a sleeping Alzheimer’s patient” ( Douthat Dr. Kevorkian’s victims). Doctors are the ones whom people entrust their lives whenever there is something wrong with them. People ought to understand the sanctity of human life, and know that the life of an innocent human being must never be intentionally put to an end. This should apply independent of whether a proposed treatment is going to have any sort of expected worthwhile effect on the quality of life of the patient. Euthanasia is not that different from murder because they both involve killing a person. In addition to this, as much as the patients choice is to be values, sick individuals may not be in position to make clear decisions on whether to end their life or not, “there can be so such thing as voluntary euthanasia, or, at the very least, that we have no means to ensure that the patients request to die was not compelled” (Campbell A problem for the voluntary euthanasia). This follows from the fact that the individuals are not rational
Euthanasia which is also known as mercy killing has been pronounced legal in many countries in the present day world. Euthanasia involves terminating the life of patients to relieve pain and suffering; which became intolerable. Euthanasia is not embraced by everyone, as some people tend to go against it on the grounds of religion and morality. As much as the euthanasia process painlessly puts a person to death, the responsibility of deciding who dies and who lives should not be left in the hands of a doctor. It is moral obligation for individuals and the society as a whole (including the doctors) to protect human life, thus euthanasia should not be legalized. Human life has great value , and thus should be preserved in all possible ways regardless of the circumstances, “ even when death is inevitable painful it is not considered merciful to prescribe an over dose to a cancer victim against her will, or go to gently smother a sleeping Alzheimer’s patient” ( Douthat Dr. Kevorkian’s victims). Doctors are the ones whom people entrust their lives whenever there is something wrong with them. People ought to understand the sanctity of human life, and know that the life of an innocent human being must never be intentionally put to an end. This should apply independent of whether a proposed treatment is going to have any sort of expected worthwhile effect on the quality of life of the patient. Euthanasia is not that different from murder because they both involve killing a person. In addition to this, as much as the patients choice is to be values, sick individuals may not be in position to make clear decisions on whether to end their life or not, “there can be so such thing as voluntary euthanasia, or, at the very least, that we have no means to ensure that the patients request to die was not compelled” (Campbell A problem for the voluntary euthanasia). This follows from the fact that the individuals are not rational