Preview

Euthanasia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
795 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthanasia
EUTHANASIA
Euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of a person or being because they are perceived as living an intolerable life, in a painless or minimally painful way either by lethal injection, drug overdose, or by the withdrawal of life support. Euthanasia is a controversial issue because of conflicting religious and humanist views.
Voluntary euthanasia occurs with the fully informed request of a decision from a competent adult patient or that of their surrogate.
Nonvoluntary euthanasia occurs without the fully informed consent and fully informed request of a decision-competent adult patient or that of their surrogate.
Involuntary euthanasia occurs over the objection of a patient or their surrogate. An example of this might be if a patient with decisional capacity is told they will be euthanized.
The Slippery Slope
Many people worry that if voluntary euthanasia were to become legal, it would not be long before involuntary euthanasia would start to happen.
This is called the Slippery Slope argument. In general form it says that if we allow something relatively harmless today, we may start a trend that results in something currently unthinkable becoming accepted.
Those who oppose this argument say that properly drafted legislation can draw a firm barrier across the slippery slope.
The Print media reports SMH
November, 2002 article called Endgame in Australia gives a summary of legislation across Australia with regard to Euthanasia, in A further article titled The Unbearable Pain of Being reported in The Age May 31 2002 gives opinion with regard to slippery slope argument, with the Dutch experience where Euthanasia can be performed with the authority of two separate psychiatrist's reports.

The Catholic Church does not approve of any methods to purposely kill someone even the terminally ill. Catholicism teaches that people should have food and water until the die naturally.
When a person is suffering from a terminal illness or other end of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Medical News Today explains euthanasia as the act of consenting to the termination of one’s life legally through a doctor. Although the general idea of euthanasia is thought of as assisted suicide, this treatment branches into several different aspects. There is passive euthanasia, which is more commonly found in Physician Assisted Suicide, and there is active euthanasia that uses lethal substances to end one’s life. The majority of controversy surrounding this topic is actually caused by the active form of euthanasia.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Research Paper on Euthanasia

    • 2719 Words
    • 11 Pages

    One of the most hotly debated ethical issue of our time is one of Euthanasia. Euthanasia comes from the Greek words “Eu”, meaning well or easy, and “Thanatos”, meaning death. In modern terms it is the intentional premature termination of another’s life by direct intervention or by withholding care.[1] Within that it can be either voluntary (expressed or implied consent), or involuntary. The two sides of this debate are the rights of an individual to decide when he or she is to die, or the sanctity of life and the states responsibility to protect people.…

    • 2719 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Voluntary and assisted euthanasia is not a new phenomenon. End of life care for long term, short term, and terminal illnesses has always occurred. However, with advances in medicine, patients’ lives may be lengthened. For many individuals, end of life care is paired with pain and suffering. Does it have to be this way? If an individual has the capacity to make their own medical decisions, and wants to end their life, should we as health care providers deny them this? We can consider suicide as self-determined…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia is an act or omission intended to cause the death of a person in order to eliminate suffering, allegedly for his/her benefit. Euthanasia can be voluntary (at the request of the person), involuntary (against the person’s wishes), or non-voluntary (when the person is unable to refuse…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this presentation I’ll explain why voluntary euthanasia should be legalised in Australia when a person is suffering from a terminal illness or are already in the late stages of an illness that cannot be cured.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia advocates Patients are constantly receiving criticism from those who believe that euthanasia is not ethical and should be illegal everywhere. Euthanasia can be defined as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease. The practice of euthanasia is illegal in most countries. Euthanasia can be either voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia occurs when the patient requests to die. Non-voluntary euthanasia occurs when a patient is either unconscious or unable to make a choice regarding their death and an appropriate person makes this decision for them. Involuntary euthanasia occurs when the patient wishes to live but is killed anyway and is considered murder. There are different…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Slippery Slope Argument

    • 2553 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The slippery slope argument is amongst the strongest voiced and possibly the most emotive of arguments in opposition to legalising voluntary active euthanasia (VAE, the act of accelerating the death of another, usually by lethal injection, for their own good and with their consent). In fact, in discussion on practically any change in social policy it is common place to hear objections to the effect, "if this, then that, and finally that" . But how valid is this form of argument? To answer this question, I will examine the nature of the slippery slope argument in its two major forms (empirical and logical), see how it has been applied to the debate on permitting voluntary active euthanasia and determine the validity of these applications.…

    • 2553 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abstract The traditional distinction between active and passive euthanasia requires critical analysis. The conventional doctrine is that there is such an important moral difference between the two that, although the latter is sometimes permissible, the former is always forbidden. This doctrine may be challenged for several reasons. First of all, active euthanasia is in many cases more humane than passive euthanasia. Secondly, the conventional doctrine leads to decisions concerning life and death on irrelevant grounds. Thirdly, the doctrine rests on a distinction between killing and letting die that itself has no moral importance. Fourthly, the most common arguments in favor of the doctrine are invalid. I therefore suggest that the American Medical Association policy statement that endorses this doctrine is unsound. (N Engl J Med 292:78-80, 1975) The distinction between active and passive euthanasia is thought to be crucial for medical ethics. The idea is that it is permissible, at least in some cases, to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die, but it is never permissible to take any direct action designed to kill the patient. This doctrine seems to be accepted by most doctors, and it is endorsed in a statement adopted by the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association on December 4, 1973: The intentional termination of the life of one human being by another -mercy killing is contrary to that for which the medical profession stands and is contrary to the policy of the American Medical Association. The cessation of the employment of extraordinary means to prolong the life of the body when there is irrefutable evidence that biological death is imminent is the decision of the patient and/or his immediate family. The advice and judgment of the physician should be freely available to the patient and/or his immediate family. However, a strong case can be made against this doctrine. In what follows I will set out some of…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Active euthanasia should be permitted as a medical treatment to allow people the right to die with dignity without pain and in peace. Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, takes on many different forms. When most Americans think of euthanasia, they think of a specific form that is referred to as “active euthanasia” which means to actively do something that will end a patient’s life with or without that individual’s consent. When euthanasia is performed in an involuntary manner it is usually because the patient is comatose, unconscious, or otherwise unable to communicate whether or not they want to have their life prolonged through artificial means. In such cases, the physician makes an executive decision whether to end the patient’s life, deeming it just because that individual would experience only pain and suffering in the continuity of their state.…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Involuntary Euthanasia: This is conducted against the consent of the patient. This decision is made by another person as the patient cannot be saved or is unable to give consent. This is usually regarded as murder, but there are exemptions. For example, a critically injured soldier asks the doctor to save him, but the doctor knows that the patient is going to die anyways and the patient is in pain and agony, the doctor may try to end his pain by performing involuntary euthanasia.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nursing Research

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Euthanasia, whether assisted or voluntary, is the act of merciful killing and its purpose is to end suffering and pain of a patients terminal illness or injury. In two states physician assisted suicide is legal. The difference between euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is in euthanasia – the healthcare provider actually does end the patients’ life. In physician-assisted suicide – the physician provides the patients with the means to perform the suicide themselves. Ethically, many principles need to be considered when options of euthanasia arise. Firstly, it is illegal in the United States, and secondly, it is considered against many ethical codes for a healthcare professional or provider to end life. The principles of non-maleficence, beneficence, and autonomy are three primary principles considered when the end of life for the patient is approaching. Healthcare professionals and healthcare providers should consider their state regulatory board limitations of practice and also code of ethics before allowing or assisting in euthanasia of patients despite their request. An analysis of ethical principles with respect to euthanasia of patients reveals that healthcare professionals and healthcare providers have to maintain nonmaleficence, beneficence and respect autonomy when making decisions and recommendations to their patients and their care.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Certain situations where Voluntary Active Euthanasia is morally permissible include; mental illness and terminal illness. The first case would be a 50 year old woman who is severely depressed with no physical illness. This woman has suffered her whole life from depression, taken numerous treatments and has failed to find a cure. From a hedonistic utilitarian perspective, “what matters is not whether the suffering is physical or psychological, but how bad it is, whether it can be relieved,” (Singer p.534). . Terminal illness is our second case. Individuals who are terminally ill will suffer for the rest of their life. An individual who has developed cancer‘s last memories will be of nothing but pain and misery, even with chemotherapy it is still not guaranteed that the individual is going to recover. Under these circumstances (mental illness and terminal illness) voluntary active euthanasia is morally permissible.# In order to follow through with the procedure with a physician, an outside source must examine the patient. The patient must be in a rational state, for example one cannot be depressed. To determine whether the person is in a rational state, they must be studied by a psychiatrist. Voluntary Active Euthanasia is morally prohibited under such circumstances as one being pressured into euthanasia or without ones consent.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assisted suicide is reportedly widely performed with no repercussions for the physicians who perform the act (Dworkin, Frey & Bok 1998). A succession of court cases culminated in agreement being reached between the legal and medical authorities to ensure that no physician would be prosecuted for assisting a patient to die as long as certain guidelines were strictly adhered to (Griffiths, Bood & Weyers 1998). These guidelines permitted physicians to practise voluntary euthanasia in instances where a competent patient had made a voluntary and informed decision to die, the patient’s suffering was unbearable, there was no way of making that suffering bearable and the physician’s judgement as to prognosis were confirmed after obtaining a second opinion from another…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The arguments opposing the legalization of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide include a wide range of varying ideals. There are those who are against these practices for religious reasons, the act of suicide or the taking of a life are viewed as Mortal, unforgivable, sins. Those who have philosophical notions that conflict with the basic idea of taking a life, and even those that worry these practices could somehow lead to Nazi like genocide. The most common arguments against the legalization of these practices are called the “Slippery Slope”, the fear that the allowance of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide would lead to an unacceptable abuse of the process and push us toward the unthinkable, involuntary euthanasia.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Involuntary Euthanasia is the complete opposite of the voluntary form of euthanasia. This is when the patient’s life is taken without the consent of the patient. This form of euthanasia is morally unacceptable and plays no current role in the debate over euthanasia in our modern society. Non-voluntary is a type of euthanasia that happens when a person becomes incapacitated due to being unconscious, comatose or in any other manner that makes the patient…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics