Preview

Europe's Northwest Expansion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
311 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Europe's Northwest Expansion
The West would not have been able to rise to the powerhouse it is today if it weren’t for the agricultural benefits they received from the South. For instance, although Europe’s northwest was not able to completely partake in Southernization due to their distant location, their rise was nevertheless very much influenced. According to the Southernization article, "Europe's northwest did not rise until it was reaping the profits of Southernization" (lines 264-265). Because this territory was far from the other southern communities, they were unable to produce cotton, sugar, spices, and other locally grown products that would benefit their society. Without southernization, they had no ability to obtain these helpful resources by themselves and
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    FRQ APUSH North vs. South
    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FRQ APUSH North vs. South

    Economically, the South had one relied resource and one only: cotton. It was the root of their profits, their lives, their surroundings. Despite the white majority of the 1860’s not being a part of the planter aristocracy, it was still their personal American Dream: to own slaves on a plantation with a pretty wife and white kids. The Southern economy depended primarily on the production and working of slaves, as the cheap labor force. On the industrial hand, the North was all about hard work and…equal rights, but mostly hard work. Their primary focus for economic gain was industry. Railroads, telegraphs, machines…oh my! The North also had the advantage of economic stability from the California Gold Rush which aided them to flourish dramatically, though plummeted during the Panic of 1857, which negatively affected the North due to the inflation caused by the gold. Once California was accepted into the Union (as a free state), its abundance of gold deposits held the North on its high horse before the reoccurring panics.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eli Whitney's Cotton Is King
    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Eli Whitney's Cotton Is King

    The South's predominant economic principle before the War of Northern Aggression was "Cotton is King." The South, as it was known around the turn of the 19th century, was solely dependent upon its cotton production. Low prices, unmarketable goods, and over-used land were driving the necessity for slavery and the need for cotton production out. Were it not for a Yankee's ingenuity, the South as we study it now may have been vastly different.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trade and Lynda Shaffer
    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Trade and Lynda Shaffer

    Lynda Shaffer, a famous world historian, has brought up a strong argument in her article entitled “Southernization”. Shaffer points out that the major reason for the advancement of Western Europe as a global, economic, and military power after the 1450’s was not due to their own strength. Shaffer states that this superiority in these areas was due to the technological advancements, crops, corporations, and other trade goods. However, according to Shaffer, these objects were borrowed from Asia and the Middle East. The collection of the technologies, crops, industries, and other trade goods were being used in Western Europe to help them rise to supremacy. Throughout her article, Lynda Shaffer makes a very strong controversy. Based on the information that I have acquired from my textbook, as well as the information presented in this article, I have concluded that this is a valid argument for many reasons. Knowing what I know now about this topic, I would agree with Shaffer’s argument.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain Why Was The South Slow To Industrialize After The Civil War
    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain Why Was The South Slow To Industrialize After The Civil War

    After the American Civil War the South was left in ruins, and the government did many things to oppress them and keep them under the North. One of the first being the Military Reconstruction Act. This slowed down the development of the south because the north forced them to focus their efforts on the reform of their governments rather than the development of the economy. However, more importantly, the main transportation system in the country at the time was dominated by the north. This was the Railroad system. The main problem that inhibited the south was that the northerners implemented a system where manufactured goods from the north and southern raw materials were cheap to transport. This kept the southerners in a niche of providing raw materials to the north by means of providing cheap prices for the transportation of raw materials.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tindall Geography: Similarities And Differences In The United States
    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Tindall Geography: Similarities And Differences In The United States

    Geographically, North and South were very different. Southern society was identical with agricultural and rural compared to the Northern society which had been imposed to the effect of urban-industrial development (480). In 1793, cotton became very profitable for the Southerners. The South relied on the production of cotton and the invention of cotton gin by Eli Whitney to grow its economic (381). Technological breakthrough like the cotton gin also quickened the agricultural development.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyze The Political Differences Between The North And South During The Civil War
    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analyze The Political Differences Between The North And South During The Civil War

    The Northern soil was in favor of small farms and less agriculture than the South, but industry flourished throughout the North due to an abundance of natural resources (North and South). With no nearby slave trading companies either; the north was more inclined to promote free-labor. On the other hand, the Southern warm climate and soil favored large plantations to grow crops such as tobacco and cotton that required a lot of manpower to produce (North and South). Also, the slave trade was very ample around the Southern states. With places such as the West Indies harboring many slave trading companies the Southern people could obtain slaves easily to work their expansive farms and plantations.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Westward Expansion Dbq
    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Westward Expansion Dbq

    westward expansion disrupted native american lives after the civil war due to expansionist invading their lands and taking their freedom, while simultaneously destroying their culture and population.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Differences Between North And South Civil War
    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Differences Between North And South Civil War

    The North and the South grew different way in Civil war. In the South, there were mostly farmers. There weren’t many skilled workers that why manufacturing was not much. But in the North there were a lot of manufacturing and wealthy people, they had a lot of skilled workers. During the Civil War, there were some advantages and disadvantages between South and North.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    European Imperialist Expansion During The Industrial Age
    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    European Imperialist Expansion During The Industrial Age

    | Raw materials(metals, vegetable oils, dyes, cotton, and hemp—needed to feed the machines of Europe, not spices or manufactured goods, were the main products the Europeans wanted.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The South Contribute To The Civil War
    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did The South Contribute To The Civil War

    As you know the agriculture economy wasn’t paid labors it was nothing but slaves so when the war ended with the North being Victorious and the union staying together, The heart of the south's economy was ripped out. The north's industrial economy never occupied such a large slave labor like that south did, so most states abolish slavery by 1800. So, as you can guess the North was never affected. Most may think that slavery was the worst thing for the South at this period of time but they also had other issues,the devastation of war had ruined farms and cities, Some northerners wanted economic revenge on the south, The confederate money,war bonds that people once had were worthless, lastly they were forced to change to a social and economic structure because of the end of…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Manifest Destiny Research Paper
    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Manifest Destiny Research Paper

    Technology included the new telegraph lines that made communication easier and more efficient. Transportation included the length of railroad lines extended from the North to the new land in the west, but the main example of the increasing the railroad line was the Transcontinental Railroad that cut through the Midwest. Demand for cash crops, which were produced in the South, grew so the farmers needed more land to meet these needs. An endless supply of rich and plentiful land, perfect for farming, was discovered in the west…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast Economic, Social, and Political Developments in the North and South Between 1800-1860.
    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Economic, Social, and Political Developments in the North and South Between 1800-1860.

    The economy of the North was through commerce, industry, finance and manufacturing. Hence, its economy was much more versified and many different jobs became available: farmers, merchants, millers, manufacturers, mechanists, etc. Since the economic activity was better and grew faster, the North became the most populated region of the States and therefore, more urbanized and industrialized than the South. Due to the fact that there were almost no slaves in this region, white population grew more here. Immigrants also settled in this region for the same economic reasons.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why the South Lost the Civil War
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why the South Lost the Civil War

    With a shortage of supplies due to lack of industrial bases, the South suffered greatly in the Civil War, ultimately causing their loss. The North’s ability to bring its industry to manufacture supplies allowed it to gain and maintain its dominance over the South. The South, having just 20,000 factories, was no competition for the North, which had 105,000 factories. However, the South at one point did have an opportunity to gain more supplies through foreign aid, which might have caused the Civil War to have a different outcome if the South would have received that aid. Britain and France were willing to give the South money, food, drugs, weapons, and many more supplies. However, the South practiced the institution of slavery, which prevented European aid. Because the middle-classes of France and Britain were against the “peculiar institution”, they chose to side with the North, rather than the South. The South’s deficiency of materials ultimately caused them to lose the Civil War because they were often not prepared for battles and did not have the necessary supplies to compete with the North’s numerous weapons from their large industries.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Cause Of Westward Expansion
    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Cause Of Westward Expansion

    Robert Morgan explains his point of view on American history through his article, “There is No True History of the Westward Expansion.” He states many times that westward expansion was fueled by everyday, normal, American people; contrary to other beliefs that westward expansion was fueled by Thomas Jefferson and others. This claim is made by Stephen Ambrose and Chief Joseph.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Westward Expansion
    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Westward Expansion

    American history was powerfully influenced throughout the 19th century by the steady push west and the development of the Western frontier. This began of course with the establishment of the first English colonies beginning with Jamestown (1607). At the time the Western Frontier was just a few miles up the James River. Gradually the Western Frontier was seen as the Appalachian Mountains. The British effort to close off the land beyond the Appalachians was one of the major causes of the Revolution (1776). The West for the early American Republic was the Ohio River Valley, which the Erie Canal played an important role in opening. To the south there were other lands beyond the Appalachians, which proved to be ideal for growing cotton based on slave labor and large plantations. The United States Western frontier was redefined by the Louisiana Purchase (1803). The economy of the West depended on the Mississippi River and the outlet to the sea at New Orleans. It is no accident that the British in the War of 1812 attempted to seize New Orleans (1815). After the War of 1812 the American movement West focused primarily on the territory east of the Mississippi. Here the Erie Canal played an important role. There were wars with the Native Americans, which helped make Andrew Jackson the prominent political figure overseeing this period. The only American president with an era named after him. The frontier, which at first seemed endless played a powerful role in the development of the American character. The existence of huge quantities of virtually free land was very different from the situation in Europe. Some historians describe this as the vital fierce in the building of America. America settled these lands on two basic lines. North of the Ohio it was free labor and small family farms. South of the Ohio it was slave labor and slave labor. Ironically the rise of the American economy was to a large degree based on slave labor that…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics