Preview

Euporia Knight Strategic Management Coach Case1

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1974 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euporia Knight Strategic Management Coach Case1
Euporia Knight
Strategic Management
Coach Case

1) What are the defining characteristics of the luxury goods industry? What is the industry like?
Defining characteristic of the luxury goods industry are the market size and growth rate, scope of rivalry presence of forward/backward vertical integration Consumer characteristics Degree of product differentiation. The global luxury goods industry was expected to grow by 7% during 2006 to reach $112 billion. The scope of rivalry in the industry was global with Italian luxury goods companies accounting for 27% of industry sales in 2005, French luxury goods companies controlling 22% of the industry, Swiss companies holding a combined market share of 19%, and U.S. companies accounting for 14% of industry revenues. Most luxury goods manufacturers were vertically integrated into the operation of retail stores. Signature like Armani, Versace, and other designers were handcrafted under the supervision of the designer. Coach products and diffusion lines offered by other luxury companies were produced by low-cost contract manufacturers. Traditional luxury consumers in the U.S. ranked in the top 1% of wage earners with household incomes of $300,000 or better, a growing percentage of luxury goods consumers earned substantially less, but still aspired to own products with higher levels of quality and styling. Manufacturers of the finest luxury goods sought to exploit middle-income consumers’ desire for such products by launching “diffusion lines” that offered “affordable” or “accessible” luxury . Key differentiating features include product quality, image and reputation, customer service, styling, and store ambiance.

2) What is competition like in the luxury goods industry? What competitive forces seem to have the greatest effect on industry attractiveness? What are the competitive weapons that rivals are using to try to outmaneuver one another in the marketplace? Is the pace of rivalry quickening and becoming more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Coach Inc. Case Analysis

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The profit potential that exist in the luxury goods industry could be better understood through an analysis of Porter’s five forces model. Starting with the threat of entry, the industry is unlikely to have new entrants because of the sustained competitive advantages of the existing successfully luxury brands. Leading companies such as Coach, Michael Kors, Salvatore Ferragamo, Prada, and etc. all have brand name recognition due to their success and popularity. According to the article, “To be unique and exclusive you cannot be ubiquitous.” (Gamble, 2015, C-81) For instance, Coach, Inc. strengthened their brand by becoming a leader in their accessible luxury segment by focusing on being unique in this market. Coach, Inc. and the other popular brands, have strong personal identifications because of the strategies they put in place. For this reason, new entrants to the market will have trouble attracting consumers who stand strong with the popular brand because of their loyalty. The power of suppliers within the industry for the luxury good market is low as the industry is not very concentrated. Materials to produce luxury goods, such as leather, are supplied in various countries throughout the world. For Coach, Inc. the case states, “All of the company’s leather products were manufactured by third-party suppliers in Asia.” (Gamble, 2015, C-71) Since Coach and the other…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coach-Industry Analysis

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Companies that produce accessories and handbags have to work very hard at keeping up with the latest fashions and making sure that they are designing items that their target market wants. The market for handbags and accessories is very large. Not only do women purchase these items for themselves, but men also purchase them for the women on such occasions as birthdays, anniversaries, Valentine’s Day, Christmas, etc. These brand name handbags such as Coach and Louis Vuitton come with a hefty price, but consumers still buy them. What makes these designer bags worth the extra money? Today there is more of a focus on the name of the designer and how much you paid for it. Rivalry among luxury handbag and accessory makers is becoming increasingly stronger. There is competition of who has the strongest brand name and the newest products. The real struggle comes when you offer too many discounts and the products no longer are seen as being a luxury item.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Case Study: Aquascutum

    • 3088 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Kapferer, J-N. and Bastien, V. (2009) The Luxury Strategy: break the rules of marketing to build luxury brands. London: Kogan Page.…

    • 3088 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coach Case Study

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Today there are key defining characteristics of luxury goods industry such as pricing, quality, style, and brand reputation. The pricing of goods is based on economics, demand increases as income increases. Pricing is also determined by exclusivity, quantity availability, quality and location of the product. The quality of a product can help determine the price, but not always. Luxury goods have higher quality, which results in higher price from the workmanship, material, and labor to product good. Many luxury goods have a particular style that is unique to each brand. Sometimes other brands or companies will try to reproduce a similar item, but cannot compete with the original style and exact fit or design. This is why the reproduced products might not sell as well as the original one. Each brand has a reputation to an individual. It can come from experience, advertising, word of mouth or location. These factors will form your personal preference to whether you will purchase goods from that particular brand. It also creates a sense of status and how others will perceive you if you have certain luxury goods. For example, you seem to be wealthy if you own Louis Vuitton or Chanel handbag over an Anne Klein handbag.…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Coach Case Study

    • 3924 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The luxury industry can also be looked at as a status symbol. Conspicuous consumption leads to increasing demands for luxury good items and it is a growing industry with the global luxury goods market growing 9% per year (Business Wire, 2007). Advertising has a lot to do with it, especially Americans who are being constantly bombarded with advertisements on a daily basis. While finding exactly how many advertisements American see a day is nearly impossible, some studies have shown the number to be between 150 and 3,000 (Mortar, 2006). This leads to more consumers being exposed to or being told which items or brands are luxury goods, but unlike the definition for luxury goods, these conspicuous consumers buy their products for satisfy their self-esteem issues rather than for ease or comfort. Although an argument can be made is…

    • 3924 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Coach Case

    • 2136 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. What are the defining characteristics of the luxury goods industry? What is the industry like? Economics define a luxury good as one for which demand increase as income increase. Luxury goods are said to have high income elasticity of demand as people become wealthier, they will buy more and more of the luxury good. This also means, however, that should there be a decline in income its demand will drop. Unlike mediocre goods, they are related to price and high-income individuals. A luxury corporation may establish its image via pricing, exclusivity, limited availability, quality and location. High pricing gives the product its prestigious nature, and implies high quality. Luxury brands in general, relied on creative designs, high quality, and brand reputation to attract customers and build brand loyalty. The market for luxury goods was divided into three main categories: haute-couture, traditional luxury, and the growing submarket “accessible luxury”. At the apex of the market was haute couture with it very high-end “custom” product offering that caters to the extremely wealthy. Luxury goods manufacturers believed diffusion brand’s lower profit margins were offset by the opportunity for increased sales volume and the growing size of the accessible luxury market and protected margins on such products by sourcing production to low-wage countries. The luxury goods industry is under drastic change and at different levels. This has an impact on Coach's business because they have two different types of stores. On one hand they have factory stores who sell at a discounted price and on the other hand they have full-priced stores or flagship stores which cater to higher end consumers. While the factory stores are being hit by the American financial crisis due to the lack of disposable income for the middle class, full-price stores or flagship stores have brighter future with an increasing number of millionaires.…

    • 2136 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coach Inc

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Coach incorporated a differentiation focus strategy to make luxury goods (luxury handbags) industry more attractive for itself. Coach entered into agreements with other companies providing rights to them to manufacture and market Coach Brand products. Royalties from such integration helped Coach to boost up their sale by 4 to 5 % in year 2006. The vital part of their business strategy was a business model focusing on frequent launch of their new product which in turn attracted their best customers to visit the stores frequently. This business model was accountable for enormous rise in numbers of handbag sales from 2002 to 2006. “Seventy percent of Coach’s 2006 sales came from products introduced within the fiscal year”(p.106). Coach was specialised for the service to their customer which involved replacement or refurbishment of the handbags without considering the age of the bag. On the other side major competitors weren’t able to cope up with Coach’s service criteria. Promotions through catalogs was their virtuous way of marketing contributed to build brand awareness and also promoted store traffic. The idea of generating revenue from factory stores fortunately became a success business model for Coach. “Coach’s factory stores had outperformed full-price stores in terms of comparable store sales growth during 2005 and 2006, with comparable factory store sales increasing by 31.9 percent during 2006 and comparable full-price store sales increasing by 12.3 percent during the year”(p.109).…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Zhan, L., & He, Y. (2011). Understanding luxury consumption in China: Consumer perceptions of best-known brands. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1452-1460.…

    • 2499 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the six years following its October 2000 initial public offering (IPO), Coach Inc.’s net sales had grown at a compounded annual rate of 26% and its stock price had increased by 1,400% as a result of a strategy keyed to “accessible” luxury. Coach created the “accessible” luxury category in ladies handbags and leather accessories by matching key luxury rivals on quality and styling, while beating them on price by 50% or more. Not only did Coach’s $200 - $500 handbags appeal to middle income consumers wanting a taste of luxury, but affluent consumers with the means to spend $2,000 or more on a handbag regularly snapped up its products as well. By 2006, Coach had become the best-selling brand of ladies luxury handbags and leather accessories in the U.S. with a 25% market share and was the second best-selling brand of such products in Japan with an 8% market share. Beyond its winning combination of styling, quality, and pricing, the attractiveness of Coach retail stores and high levels of customer service provided by its employees contributed to its competitive advantage. Much of the company’s growth in net sales was attributable to its rapid growth in companyowned stores in the U.S. and Japan. Coach stores ranged from prominent flagship stores on Rodeo Drive and Madison Avenue to factory outlet stores. In fact, Coach’s factory stores had achieved higher comparable store growth during 2005 and 2006 than its full-price stores. At yearend 2006, comparable store sales in Coach factory stores had increased by 31.9% since year-end 2005, while comparable store sales for Coach full price stores experienced a 12.3% year-overyear increase. Coach’s dramatic growth that resulted from its strategy keyed to “accessible luxury” had not gone unnoticed by long-established luxury goods makers. In 2006, most leading designer brands had developed sub-brands that retained the styling and quality…

    • 5116 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Coach Case

    • 1392 Words
    • 7 Pages

    diffusion their lines in the accessible luxury. Luxury goods demand increase as the income increase.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burberry Case

    • 1063 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Exhibit 13, the respective market shares for Polo, Armani, Gucci, and Burberry are 9.1%, 3.5%, 4.4%, and 5.2%. Coach was not included among the Top 10 Global Luxury Goods Players in general, but specific to accessories, they have an estimated 6% market share compared to Burberry’s 4%. This data illustrates that Burberry is doing quite well. They are one of the Top 5 Global Luxury Goods Players and it appears that they have plenty of room for growth. Unlike many of its other competitors, as mentioned by Rosie Bravo, Burberry has positioned itself as brand that is not only aspirational, but also functional. This best of both worlds quality differentiates Burberry from many of the other players. Under Bravo’s guidance, Burberry now appeals to a wide demographic in terms of age, income, and fashion preferences. However, this might actually be an area of concern because now every firm is a competitor. In essence, Burberry does have a very sustainable competitive position, though it might be wise to shift towards one spectrum (i.e. lifestyle or fashion) instead of straddling between the two.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper, I mainly analyses Burberry’s performance and describing some of the companies’ background. Besides that, I also did some research on the structure and the competitiveness of the luxury fashion industry.…

    • 4001 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Burberry Case

    • 2746 Words
    • 11 Pages

    According to industry observers, luxury brands tend fare better than mass market brands during times of economic hardship. It is agreed, that in general luxury products are based on basic…

    • 2746 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prada Case Analysis

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Beginning from 2010, the global luxury goods market started a new growth phase driven by emerging markets. This was a significant change as growth was usually driven by the developed markets, especially the US.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Burberry Plc Research Report

    • 5076 Words
    • 21 Pages

    References: 1. Burberry PLC company annual reports, 2002 to 2010 2. Bain & Company Luxury Goods Worldwide Market Study, 2009 3. Capital IQ financial data, 05 August 2005 4. Barclays Capital European Luxury Goods equity research report, Dec 2009 5. Barclays Capital European Luxury Goods: Soft Luxury equity research report, Dec 2009 6. Google Finance financial data 7. Bloomberg financial data 8. Burberry PLC website…

    • 5076 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays