Preview

Ethics Committee Report 2

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
495 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethics Committee Report 2
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) involves the testing of numerous embryos, not just one. After all of the embryos have gone through screening and received a diagnosis, the parents choose one embryo to implant and the others are usually discarded. PGD is a process of selection, not prevention. In other words, PGD is not the prevention of a single embryo from having a disability; it is the selection of an embryo without one. In this paper I will argue that PGD is morally wrong. Many families suffer from different genetic diseases and carry the trait, which can cause their child to have the disease. I understand that parents’ do not want to take on the responsibility of dealing with a child that is sick and could possibly die. But that does not give you the reason to choose how your baby should be.
I do feel that PGD is morally wrong because a special baby is giving to special people. No one should be able to choose how their baby will be in the future, that decision is left up to God who has sent the child to you. Choosing the embryo you want is not right because humans have value and worth. They require to be respected. Each person deserves to be respected for his/her integral being, no matter who they are. While PGD is performed on fetuses, its use is still unjustified because fetuses could-be a person and therefore, require the same amount of respect as any other person. Furthermore, the use of PGD is creating what they want and not what God wants for their child.
Another reason the technology behind PGD is wrong because it would allow parents to select specific and nonessential traits, such as eye color, height, and athletic ability, even intelligence that they want their child to express and why can’t they just let that happen naturally. They should just wait to see what their child looks like once they enter the world. This technology is the same as the Build-a-Bear Workshop, but for grown-ups. I just don’t understand why a person would want to do

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    My Sister's Keeper

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    PGD is known as pre-implantation genetic diagnosing. I do not think it is ethical to design and conceive a child that meets specific genetic requirements. I do not feel that this is an ethical reason to conceive a child. Rather, I believe all children should be seen as blessings or gifts, not sacrificial genetic progeny.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic coding allows parents to pick and choose the sex of their baby, the height that their baby will be, how athletic the baby will grow up to be and as genetic coding happens more and more, the more things that we will be able to modify through genetic coding takes away the opportunity that each child will grow up to be whatever/whoever they want to be. Sandel says it best when he says, “To appreciate children as gifts is to accept them as they come, not as objects of our design or products of our will or instruments of our ambition” (Sandel 128), that we should accept and love our children for who they are, to teach them right from wrong and then from there, let them make their own…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most healthcare organizations operate on the accrual accounting basis. With this type of accounting; revenue is recorded when it is earned-not when payment is received; and expenses are recorded when they are incurred-not when they are paid.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Baker J.J., & Baker, R.W. (2011). Health Care finance; Basic tools for nonfinancial managers (3rd ed).Jones & Bartlett…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pgd Ethical Dilemmas

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page

    You stated a valid point Gracela that healthcare providers and companies might use genetic engineering such as Preimplantation Genetic disorder (PGD) for profit instead of what is ethically and morally appropriate. People have a different point of views over the legal and moral status of embryos and the nonexistence of regulation in the USA makes us a breeding ground for reproductive tourism for patients coming from other countries with stricter guidelines on the use of PGD (Bayefsky, 2017). Totally agree with you that a policy is needed, and definitely, an intense argument will ensue on how to resolve this kind of ethical dilemma if the US legislators decided to regulate…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As research continues to uncover new disease-causing mutations, the prospect of stopping the transmission of heritable diseases increases. With the use of modern technology, expecting parents can now be prescreened in order to determine their carrier status for certain diseases. Parents who choose to use in vitro fertilization are able to choose embryos that are free of disease due to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Additionally, parents can be provided with information on their unborn child with the use of prenatal genetic testing. Some individuals view modern genetic technology as eugenic; however, this biggest difference between eugenics now and eugenics during the 1900s is consent. Today individuals pursue genetic testing by choice and policies on ethics and consent prevent reoccurrences of the immoral endeavors within the field of…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article “The Moral Logic of Stem-Cell Research” by the Stem-Cell Debate tells us the benefits of tampering the cell such as finding a cure for a specific disease. The research of embryo may be able to save many people who needs transplants. Despite the benefits of the research, altering the embryo is considered as a criminal offense since it is like killing a baby. The embryos possess the same inviolability of fully developed human beings meaning that people needs to take consideration of how valuable life is. Some people see embryo as a “thing” because they want their desires/benefits to be fulfilled. Although the research shows great advancements in society, sacrificing a life to further the research is not human like. In pregnancies,…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    prenatal genetic testing

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Prenatal genetic testing is followed by selective abortion is morally problematic and that it is driven by misinformation.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. No, I would not do pre-implantation genetic diagnosis if money was no object. I do not think that it is right to go through the genetic information of an embryo and decide what you want and what you do not want. I think that all physical attributes such as height, hair color, and eye color, should be decided naturally. As well as the physical attributes, I think genetic disorders and hereditary diseases should be left alone. If they were in the genetic makeup of the human embryo, then God has a reason for them to be there. God may want that human to grow up to face the disease, then survive, telling an inspiring story about how they overcame that struggle. It may also be there for God to show his mercy. The child may have a potentially high risk of a particular disease by a certain age, but end up not getting the disease at all. As well as some diseases and disorders being part of God’s will, I also think that it is becoming partly racist. People are wanting to choose what they think is ‘perfect’ for their child, when in all reality it may be no where close. Society’s definition of ‘perfect’ may not be healthy for a child. Eventually, parents would decide to have a ‘regular’ and ‘perfect’ child just like the rest of our society, making the world have no variety in human looks. Just as Hitler had, some might look at pre-implantation genetic diagnosis as singling out the ‘perfect race’, or as Hitler said, the Aryan Race. After a while, parents might end up choosing ultimately everything they want to have in their child, expelling any imperfections, flaws, disorders, or diseases. Then, if one disease happens to pass by the genetic diagnosis, the child might be criticized and cast out from our society. This could possibly lead to immense and massive racism.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the past thirty years, humans are witnessing a huge revolution in the genetic engineering industry. Having identified most of the Human Genome, gene sequencing has become programmed and extremely fast, and laboratory techniques in molecular biology allow for in-vitro fertilization and transfer of genetic material. Gene therapy and repair based on stem cells research allows for replacement of a defected allele in the DNA, and even a whole damaged tissue in the patient. In general, it is accurate to say that genetic engineering is a controversial topic about which people tend to have strong opinions. The genetic engineering issues that mainly catch the attention of the moral community involve the pre-birth improvement of human fetuses. The ability to screen for detectable diseases is already available in the laboratories. Fertility clinics are also currently able to satisfy the need of a couple for conceiving a male or female child, following the parents’ request, but this is routine compared to the potential of genetic engineering, whose avant-garde aim is the selection of specific traits such as hair color, height and even intelligence. It is this selection that is the most fascinating upshot of advances in genetic engineering, but also the most difficult genetic issue facing the moral society.…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Here, when parents are planning on having a baby, they are faced with having to decide whether they want a genetically engineered baby or whether they want to let nature run its course. However, this decision involves much more than a simple yes or no, as this decision will decide their child’s social location and will assign them a master status. Deciding to genetically engineer their baby, parents are assuring their baby the master label of valid, but parents who decide to let nature run its course, are taking the huge risk of having a no-perfect child who will be labeled with the master status of ‘invalid,’ one which can’t be changed.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Savior Siblings

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Using preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to obtain a healthy embryo to be used as a savior sibling raises the ethical concern that the baby will be used exclusively as a means to save another child and will not be valued in his or her own right. This would directly violate the Kantian ethic which states that people are valuable in themselves and should not be used solely to serve the will of others (Johnson, 2004). However, in this specific case, the Nash family clearly expressed that they were already planning on having another child and that saving Molly was not their only motivation for wanting to do so. Because the family did not use Adam solely as a stem cell donor, they did not violate Kant’s original principle. The Nash family did not use Adam to save Molly and then abandon him once he served his purpose; he was instead loved and treated as a human being. If the family were planning on taking an organ or bone marrow from the newborn, the argument that the child was created solely to serve the express needs of his/her sibling would have more weight. Since all that was taken from Adam were stem cells from the umbilical chord, he was left unaffected and no moral wrongs were performed. The parents viewed PGD as a method that could potentially give them a healthy child, while saving the life of their other child. Because it was…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pgd Persuasive Essay

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This cost and decision causes a problem because it then only becomes available to people who can afford it and is therefore favouring the affluent. It is unfair for families that are not as well off to miss out on an opportunity due to cost and this is another reason why I think the whole process of PGD is unfair on society. Another issue that I see about the use of this technology is adoption. There are many children out there who are born into unfortunate circumstances and abandoned by their mothers for adoption. Through the use of IVF, infertile parents can have a child of their own blood which is a selfish option when you think about all the chidren out there that need a home. IVF reduces the want to parents to bring up a child, and therefore…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Previously an idea conjured by science fiction novels and films, genetically designed children may soon become reality for expecting parents. Genetic engineering will allow parents to decide what their baby will look like from eye colour to their skin colour even if they will be intelligent or creative. Although some people may like the idea of being able to genetically engineering your baby it does have many down sides for example to have all the research done they have to use embryos and if the tests do not work the embryos will not be kept it will be disposed of. With this new genetic engineering and research parents will be able to prevent their babies being born with a physical or learning disability. It is obvious that if parents could they would prevent their baby being born with a disability, but this will have a negative effect on society as it would mean that everyone would nearly have the same genetics as no parent would want their child to be born with a disability. Although all the research has been studied a lot there is still a lot of complications and this means that if an embryo does not meet the criteria it will not be kept it will just be disposed off. This increasingly worrying issue presents a host of ethical issues, with a large number of negatives that far outweighs the…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is no doubt in anyone’s mind that it is unethical to purposely abort a child strictly for research purposes. However, once a child has been naturally aborted, aborted by choice of the mother due to other extraneous factors, or is simply lying in a pitri dish at a fertilization clinic, the precious tissue will otherwise go to waste. According to studies, “about 16,000 embryos are created in clinics each year, the majority of which are deemed unsuitable to transplantation in the mothers’ wombs” (Bettelheim 1067). There are estimated to be some 400,000 unused embryos in fertilization clinics, of which 8,000-10,000 will be simply discarded yearly (Clemmit 699). This waste of potentially life-saving stem cells is clearly unnecessary. At what stage of development should we consider an embryo a person with the same rights we receive? This long discussed concept is still in question today, with what seems to be no hope for consensus in sight for the near future. There are, however, some inevitable truths that we can find…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays