Preview

Ethical Egoism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1596 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Egoism
Love Your Neighbor As Yourself: Response to Ethical Egoism
PHIL-122
22 March 2013

We are often taught at an early age that when struggling to make a decision to “let our consciences be our guides”. Conscience can be defined as our adherence to moral principles, or our considerations of fairness and justice. The word “consideration” is used because every individual has their own standards for what they feel to be morally right versus what they feel to be morally wrong, however this concept is not as black and white as it may seem. We accredit our moral considerations to many external and internal factors. An example of an external factor is government laws because they are predetermined rules about behavior and action that have been societally deemed as morally wrong. Laws are based on sociological mores, which follow a culture’s commonly shared and widely observed moral behavior, therefore breaking a law implies going against the proper code your society. Prison also has an external influence on our decision making because it serves as a threat for the negative consequences of disobeying laws, such as the loss of our freedom. Internal factors are our own self-value and personal virtues as well as our sense of selfishness and our concerns of morality. Ethical egoism is the philosophical belief that moral agents ought to do what is in their own self-interest because that is the rational way to live. It contrasts with the theory of ethical altruism, which holds that’s it is our moral obligation to help others. A philosopher and avid supporter of ethical egoism named Ayn Rand however saw ethical altruism in a different way. She viewed altruism as self-sacrifice, and as a state of mind absent from the reality of the life and worth of a human being. Rand was the creator of the property of ethical egoism known as objectivism, or the philosophy that the proper life for rational beings is the pursuit of happiness, and that altruism is incompatible with



Bibliography: Pojman, Louis P. “Egoism and Altruism: A Critique of Ayn Rand” The Moral Life: An Introductory Reader in Ethics and Literature. Louis P. Pojman & Lewis Vaughn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Rand, Ayn. “In Defense of Ethical Egoism” The Moral Life: An Introductory Reader in Ethics and Literature. Louis P. Pojman & Lewis Vaughn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the text Twenty Questions by G Lee Bowie, I chose the chapter “Why Shouldn’t I Be Selfish”? In that chapter the two selections that were chosen were The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins and The Virtue of Selfishness by Ayn Rand. The two discuss and give examples of how selfishness is simply for survival and how being selfish can benefit that individual. The term selfishness stated by Ayn Rand is defined as “concern with one’s own interest” (525). In both selections of the chapter both philosophers compared how ones selfish action is based on the question, who benefits from it? Based off of both selections “The Selfish Gene” and “The Virtue of Selfishness” it can be agreed that when one is selfish he thinks of only the benefits he gain from it and not his rival.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (2002) moral decision-making is “a process by which individuals use moral rules to determine whether an issue is right or wrong”. According to Rest (1986), 4 processes influence a moral act: a) Realizing the moral issue, b) making a moral judgment, c) establishing moral intention, and, d) taking moral action. Rest also pointed out that being successful in one moral stage might not lead into the next stage. In 1991, Jones elaborated upon the Rest’s model, introducing a factor called ‘issue contingencies’ as a being significant in the decision-making process. In other words, moral issues vary across situations and cause individuals to react…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Rachels

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages

    James Rachels argues against theories of selfishness that the psychological egoists maintain. He challenges the view that everyone always does what he or she wants by showing that we often dounpleasant tasks for the future pleasures or from obligation. Altruism is recognized as not acting in self interest. He also clears up the confusions that selfishness and self interest share the same meaning. *Psychological egoists argue that we always do what we want to do. Rachel says that is questionable and there are two classes of actions that are exceptions to the generalization. One is a set of actions we do not want to do but we do as a means toan end we want to achieve. For example, going to the dentist to fix a toothache or going to work everyday to get paid at the end of the month. The other set of actions are those which we do, not because we want to or because there is an end to achieve but because we feel obligation to do them. Rachel states for example, someone may do something because he or she has promised to do it and thus feels obligated, even though he or she does not want to do it. The second statement psychological egoists argue is that, to do what one wants to do is acting selfishly, therefore we always act selfishly. Rachels states this example, Smith wants to do something that will help his friend even if it means putting on hold his own enjoyments, and Rachel says that is what makes Smith unselfish. Rachel says the mere fact that I am acting on my wants does not mean I am acting selfishly; that depends on what it is that I want. If I want only my own good, and care nothing for others, then I am selfish; but if I also want to help other people, and if I act on that desire, then m y actions are not selfish.*The psychological egoism stance can ask then why Smith gets satisfaction from helping hisfriend and the answer is because he is selfish. But actually if we have a positive attitude towards reaching a goal, we get satisfaction from reaching the goal.…

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical egoism is all about doing what will make oneself better off. The interests of others by and of itself, counts for nothing to an ethical egoist. A modified version could be as follows:…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics of Emergencies

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethics of Emergencies “The Ethics of Emergencies” explains Ayn Rand’s radical and unique view of altruism. She believes that there are 4 consequences of altruism, all of which are negative. These, simply put, are lack of self-esteem, lack of respect for others, a pessimistic view of life, and an indifference to ethics. She says that altruism hinders acts of true benevolence, and instead people act out of an obligation to others that has been internalized over time. Rand then argues that one should only volunteer to help strangers in emergency situations, and even then, only when the risk to one’s own life is less than the risk to the stranger’s. Rand advocates action in such emergencies because of the high value of human life. But Rand does not believe that assistance should not be given in non- life threatening situations. She views hunger, illness, and poverty as part of the experience of human life and not a threat to human life. Rand also analyzes the motives of those who risk their own lives to save a loved one’s. She denies an altruistic motive and instead cites selfishness as the cause. Rand says the Altruist’s favorite argument is that of the downing man. She disagrees with the notion of saving the man and recommends the contrasting view: "If the person to be saved is a stranger, it is morally proper to save him only if the risk to one's own life is minimal; when the danger is great, it would be immoral to attempt it; only a lack of self esteem could permit one to value one's life no higher than that of any random stranger." I was shocked when I first read her rationale. If you endanger your life to save a stranger, you are immoral! But not just immoral, also psychologically damaged, in that you lack self-esteem! Now imagine the downing man incident occurring in a world where almost everyone has adopted Rand’s moral code. A lone young man is swept out to sea on a dangerous beach. The crowd stands by, doing nothing, as they have too much self-esteem to…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psychological Egoism

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethics is a requirement for human life. It is our means of deciding a course of action. Without it, our actions would be random and aimless. There would be no way to work towards a goal because there would be no way to pick between a limitless numbers of goals. Even with an ethical standard, we may be unable to pursue our goals with the possibility of success. To the degree which a rational ethical standard is taken, we are able to correctly organize our goals and actions to accomplish our most important values. Any flaw in our ethics will reduce our ability to be successful in our endeavors. Since psychology and morality are related, moral theories must be psychologically realistic which consequently includes behaviorally/motivationally realistic. This correlation between our cognitive processes and our resulting behavior are two variables of ethics that must be considered and thereby examined closely. While psychological egoism isn’t an ethical theory and rather discusses our motivation for certain behaviors, we still find the connection to this example and examples from previous chapters.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theories Of Altruism

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Egoism is the act of behaving self-interestedly, and is perceived as a negative trait even though it can be seen as a tool of survival (Rosenstand, 2003: 131). However, there is an opposing theory, which is altruism. Altruism is defined as a concern for the welfare of others and is considered virtuous (Rosenstand, 2003: 150). We are often made aware of heroes who risk their lives for others and these heroes inspire many. We are encouraged to be altruistic, early in our lives. Nonetheless, one notices how altruist acts usually include rewards, even if it’s just a simple thank you. This leads to questions such as, does true altruism exist, or do people always have a motive as to why they perform altruistically?…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Rachels, J. & Rachels, S. (2012). The Elements of Moral Philosophy (7th Ed.).New York, New York. Mc Graw Hill Companies, Inc.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of egoism is presented in Anthem, authored by Ayn Rand, using the principle that every man’s primary obligation should be toward his own well-being. Once Equality realizes what the sacred word to his society is, he begins to write about how the concept of altruism should not be placed at the root of a man’s heart, rather the concept of egoism. As Equality sits with his journal he writes, “For the word ‘We’ must never be spoken, save by one’s choice and as a second thought” (Rand 96). Equality believes that man shall not serve others, rather service themselves in an almost ‘selfish’ manner, with the exception of a man’s choice to work alongside other people. In summary, Equality believes that egoism should be the primary obligation…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fight for survival is a conflict that all species encounter. It is instinctive for all animals to put up their best defence and protect themselves when a threat is encountered. In higher order thinking animals such as us humans, confronting a challenging conflict requires elaborate cognitive thought processes. Depending on the individual’s own conscience, some people may succumb to compromising their values in order to protect themselves. In many instances, in both the fictional world and real life, an individual is put in a position where they must decide what is more important to them – self-preservation or moral values.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Objectivism, as defined by Ayn Rand in the book Objectively Speaking is that man exists for his own sake, that he must neither sacrifice himself to other nor sacrifice others to himself and that his highest moral purpose is the achievement of his own happiness. This shows that man exists for himself and that his greatest value is the achievement of his own value, or happiness. Objectivism is a near synonym for individualism and a near opposite of collectivism.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rosenstand, N. (2003). The Moral of the Story:An Introduction to Ethics (4th ed.). New York: NY: McGraw-Hill.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Egoism is the ethical philosophy that focuses on self-interest as the base of morality. In the novel The Fountainhead, the character of Roark displays great honesty towards himself and the people who he encounters in his life. Roark is also a man who has a strong desire toward his work as an architect and accomplishing whatever he can to achieve personal success. This character is extremely independent and sees his opinion as the only one worth listening to. In part one of Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead, the character of Howard Roark is characterized to be egotistic by revealing him as having integrity, being passionate and being independent.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1891, Voltairine de Cleyre wrote The Philosophy of Selfishness and Metaphysical Ethics, critiquing the selfish and egoistic mindset of society. This same mindset is critiqued by Mary Fisher in “A Whisper of AIDS”. She uses rationally emotional rhetoric in order to criticize this “self-ism” that exists in the world.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Ethical Egoism

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Theory of ethical egoism is a moral theory that is about how an action is done for our own best interest. It’s deciding what’s most favorable for me that’ll benefit my own interest. It’s putting one’s own welfare first. Ethical egoism is also seen as for example as performing actions of good deed to someone else where at the end you’re promoting your self-interest. Though you’re thinking of your own self-interest you’re still making sure that what you do is done wisely and have considered any long term effects that may come along.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics