Preview

Essay On Welfare Drug Testing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
845 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Welfare Drug Testing
Drug Testing for Welfare As of today, over sixteen percent of Americans are receiving some form of welfare benefits. “Welfare is classified as a statutory procedure or social effort designed to promote the basic physical and material well-being of people in need”: Welfare is provided by the government, both state and federal. (http://dictionary.com/browse/welfare) The government receives the money from the taxpayers in order to support welfare recipients. Tax payers are the working class. Seventy-five percent of citizens that are among the social class, also known as the working class, are required to take pre-employment drug screening. When citizens receive welfare; however, they are not required to take drug screenings, even though they receive the funds from the government. Drug tests for welfare recipients will be one way to start saving money in this country. Many people today are arguing whether this move towards making drug testing a requirement to receive welfare benefits is unjust or not. This argument is based on the fourth amendment …show more content…
(http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/fourth_amendment) Is it unjust to make the working class take pre-employment drug testing? No, so how is it unjust to require welfare recipients to take drug tests. The working class pays taxes. Those taxes go to the government. The government then budgets for the funds to go towards programs such as welfare. Many people would argue that not all people on welfare are “playing” the system, but in life, it’s not all people that are the ones to take advantage of things. The government currently uses the method of don’t ask about drug usage, welfare recipients don’t tell about drug usage. However, as many people have said over centuries of time, “one bad apple ruins the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Court Cases: Goldberg V. Kelly and Mathews V. Eldridge
    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Court Cases: Goldberg V. Kelly and Mathews V. Eldridge

    Since these fair hearings will cost the state more money, the state is allowed to have it 's legal weapons to save itself from higher costs, the welfare system is considered property rather than gratuity and must be protected…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Wallberg Commissioner Of Social Services Of The City Of New York V. Goldberg Case Study
    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wallberg Commissioner Of Social Services Of The City Of New York V. Goldberg Case Study

    As Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the Court, he quoted the district court saying “...to cut off a welfare recipient in the face of…’brutal need’ without prior hearing of some sort is unscionable…”. That is to say, if a recipient’s public assistance is terminated and determination of eligibility is ongoing and unresolved, the recipient is being deprived of “the means by which to live” while he/she waits for a resolution. Which means families are no longer receiving financial support, and the benefits families were obtaining to stay in their homes or to continue paying for their homes, are no longer being given. Furthermore, according to the majority’s reasoning, public assistance is a right. The 14th Amendment states that “...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without the due process of law...”; and that is what public assistance is, property. There is such a ‘brutal need’ for the aid and people will be extremely affected if removed, that it can no longer be considered a privilege but a property right. Therefore, the recipients need for continuous benefits, outweigh the State’s interest in preserving the public…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of No Drug Test No Welfare Yee
    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of No Drug Test No Welfare Yee

    Whether or not a drug test is required by recipients of welfare has been questioned time and time again by many states. In the article "No drug test, no welfare", Kimberly Yee expands upon on this question by explaining what her stand point is on the many advantages of drug testing for welfare. In this particular article, Ms. Yee does not sufficiently argue her position on the subject of welfare recipients taking drug test to receive benefits.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Policy Proposal II: Drug Testing For Welfare
    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Policy Proposal II: Drug Testing For Welfare

    Ok, let's all look at this as realistically as we can; if just 1 person failed a drug test for the welfare, that's a whole extra few hundred dollars per month that our government can save, and that's only for 1 person! A typical drug test cost around $10 for the cheaper ones. That's store price too, that's not considering what government contracter bulk…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    U.S. Social Welfare Argument Summary
    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    U.S. Social Welfare Argument Summary

    Isn't it ironic in our society today, that individuals are administered drug testing if they want to bring home a paycheck in efforts to provide a roof over their head, clothes on their back, and food in their mouth? At the same time it's not required by another individual who is requesting government assistance in their efforts to receive the exact same things? You could argue that the individuals applying for those jobs are not personally obligated in any way to subject themselves to undergo any drug-testing. However, those same individuals would likely be overlooked for any consideration of employment due to failure of meeting the companies drug-free policy. So why aren't welfare recipients required to undergo drug-testing in order to receive any government assistance?…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Welfare Unplugged Pros And Cons
    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Welfare Unplugged Pros And Cons

    The definition makes welfare sound easy, but there are many loop holes in the system that many people take advantage of. With over 40 million Americans receiving food stamps and 50 percent of households relying on government assistance, the system is doomed to fail if there is not a change. Hard working Americans will not be able to much longer provide what many receiving assistance have grown accustomed to. Throughout the course of American history welfare has been “reformed” many times to only cause problems later in the future. The idea of welfare was formed with great intentions, but it has spiraled out of control. Many people take advantage of the tax dollars that people work hard for. Some Americans spend their government check on drugs. They simply sale their food stamp card for extra cash to buy unnecessary things. The author of “Welfare Programs Should Include Mandatory Drug Testing” shares a personal experience and states, ‘Growing up, my mother was a recipient who abused the welfare system. I remember having no heat or electricity and being so hungry it was painful. My siblings and I would fist fight over food. She would trade her food stamp card for various things like cash, cigarettes and an occasional joint. She just wouldn 't help herself, and we were the kids that no one…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Do Will Welfare Drug Tests Save Money?
    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Do Will Welfare Drug Tests Save Money?

    There is much debate regarding this issue. Supporters of requiring drug tests for welfare applicants believe that there will be many people deterred from applying due to knowing they will not pass. They also believe that some will fail the drug tests. These supporters believe this number of people will be so large that there will be a significant decrease in welfare spending. Other supporters have said “substance abuse is a prominent barrier preventing people from making the necessary transition from governmental dependence to self-reliance.”(Targeted News Service) Opponents have said this is a direct violation of our constitutional rights as American citizens. Some have even said it is not right to assume that just because people are poor, they drug users. Other opposers of welfare drug testing have argued that it will not save money at…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Persuasion on Drug Testing Welfare Recipients
    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Persuasion on Drug Testing Welfare Recipients

    If mandatory drug testing were implemented, fewer checks would be used to purchase illegal drugs, and be used for necessary items instead. When a person is addicted to drugs, it consumes the individual’s life. The person becomes obsessed with the drug they are addicted to; it becomes more important to them, than, food, family and even their own well-being. This behavior puts them and everyone under their care at risk. If a welfare recipient has children and they use the money meant to feed their children for drugs; not only has our government paid for someone’s high, but the child will now go without food. On the flipside, if mandatory random drug testing was part of the process, we would be able to identify abusers and have their children placed where they can be cared for more effectively. This may help the next generation not to follow in their parent’s footsteps. In identifying this type of behavior, we may be able to save not only the children, but the abusers as well.…

    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drug Testing Welfare Recipients
    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Drug Testing Welfare Recipients

    Drug testing welfare recipients has been a major topic across the United States for a few years now. Many argue that if working class people are subject to a test prior to hire or randomly during the length of employment, why should those that don’t have to work for money not have the same treatment? Invasion of privacy is a huge disadvantage on the government’s part, yes it is free money but that doesn’t entitle anyone, even government, to control every aspect of your life or hold it constantly over a person’s head until they feel guilt or just flat decline assistance. Let’s ask ourselves just one question; if you went to the bank for a car loan, being this is a necessity for everyday living to own, how would you feel if they asked you to take a drug test prior to lending you the money? I feel many peoples’ tune would change drastically.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should Welfare Recipients Be Drug Tested?
    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should Welfare Recipients Be Drug Tested?

    Secondly, drug testing will require recipients to stay free of using drugs. If people really need the assistance money then they will chose to either stay clean or get help to get clean. Recipients who fail the test or simply refuse to take the test will not receive an assistance check and without the welfare money people will not be able to afford drugs. Therefore, drug testing welfare recipients would help clean up illegal drug use…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is Law Just Or Unjust Research Paper
    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Is Law Just Or Unjust Research Paper

    In order to decide whether a law is just or unjust, we must first delve into the logic of laws established in the past. Since the United States came into existence, laws have come and gone, sometimes addressing very specific circumstances which no longer apply to the modern rules of our government. In today’s society, these outdated laws may seem bizarre, but at some point in time they were believed to be important. A numerous amount of these laws have fallen off the books years ago or perhaps were nullified by new sets of laws that are more relevant in today’s society. Nevertheless, these strange laws existed and, whether or not their rationale is known, they were actually written down for a legislature to agree on and pass at one point in…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Welfare Drug Testing
    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Persuasive Essay On Welfare Drug Testing

    Should people who want welfare be required to take a drug test? People say the fourth amendment protects them because it states “ unreasonable searches and seizures.” Welfare drug testing is a common way to make sure taxpayer dollars are used responsibly. People who have to pay for other people’s welfare because they can go into work disagree with people who even have to think twice about drug testing being required to receive welfare. Taxpayers who pay on welfare think the government is responsible to make sure that their money is being used correctly and to make sure that drug users don’t receive any funds from the state. Why should we support their drug use, if you want drugs you should be able to pay for your own needs. We shouldn’t support basically feeding into their drugs use and letting them slowly kill themselves. Instead we should provide rehabs and hospital treatments. We don’t need to lock the addict up we need to get them help because they’re cable of so much more than what their setting their mindset do. They’re putting a limit to their goals and success in life. You can do…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Welfare Drug Testing Research Paper
    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Welfare Drug Testing Research Paper

    I am not saying that everybody on welfare is a lazy bum, but the welfare system has been taken advantage of by way too many people. There needs to be some kind of check to make sure that people are actually trying to make a living for themselves, and are using the money provided by the citizens of the US in a respectable way. Maybe instead of sending a check each month, issue the money onto like a prepaid credit card, and do not allow cash to be taken out at ATMs or banks. This way we are almost positive that the funds are going toward food, childrens items, and necessities. Also, take marijuana off the list of drugs that if found make you ineligible. Lets get real here. Everybody, or at least a LOT of people smoke weed. I feel like it could be much worse. Save the restrictions for the hard drug users, such as cocaine, heroine, and meth. I do not believe that drug testing is any violation to our constitutional rights. Simply keep the tests confidential, and either way the recipient is going to get the money whether the check is in their name, or their friends name. I feel like the only people that would have a problem with this are the drug users. If you are a single mother and honestly do need the money to make ends meet then (and drug free), then I do not see the big deal with agreeing to a…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Welfare and Drug testing; Unconstitutional?
    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Welfare and Drug testing; Unconstitutional?

    My answer and my honest opinion about the subject is that I believe it is perfectly fine to drug test welfare recipients in order for them to receive their government assisted checks. Do I believe that this is constitutional? Yes, yes I do. The reason being is that why should any other hard working American go through a drug screening in order to work and receive his or her hard earned check. As of today in 48 states, there is no law stating that welfare recipients should be subject to drug testing. It’s plain and simple, if a person can afford drugs on a regular basis, why should that person get free money? Some people feel that drug testing recipients is unconstitutional, and that is strips people of their rights. I believe in order for people to get help, they should comply with the rules and regulations to get the benefits of welfare. If that’s a problem for some people, there is no one forcing them to apply and get help.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Guenther's Evaluation Of The Criminal Justice System Summary
    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Guenther's Evaluation Of The Criminal Justice System Summary

    The issue was weather or not to drug test those getting welfare because if someone is on welfare they shouldn’t be doing drugs. The thought was if one has to get drug tested at a their job then to earn money, shouldn’t those on welfare have to pass one to get it? It all has to do with perspective and stereotypes, people preserve that everyone on welfare is lazy and does drugs when actually most of the people on welfare actually need it. When they did put the drug testing into place they only found a few people who were positive for drugs out of thousands an ended up wasting hundreds of thousands of dollars. It all has to do with how people’s perceptions and stereotypes, which also leads into why Affirmative action was something that many white Americans did not like. Affirmative action was not popular among the white population, because it meant that when applying to college someone who was maybe less qualified than you were would get in because of their race, or at least that is what people perceive to be true. What people weren’t understanding was how much it may mean for that other person to get in over them, they may have been the first in their family to go off to college. People perceive that, affirmative action is why they did not get in to their college of choice, when it could have been someone from out of state because colleges want people from out of state so that they can make…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics