Preview

Essay On Speech Codes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
571 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Speech Codes
Although they have received more press coverage lately, after several high profile incidents occurred at prestigious colleges, Speech Codes have existed substantially since the mid 1980s. As a result of a change in demographics on college campuses, and a wave of political correctness, “one estimate is that between the years of 1986 and 1991 alone, 137 colleges and universities adopted new speech codes”(Jon Gould, The Triumph of Hate Speech Regulation: Why Gender Wins But Race Loses in America, 6 Mich. J. Gender & L. 153, 158 (1999). These codes were born out of changing circumstances on colleges, where more students from traditionally marginalized groups were attending school and integrating into the student body. As a result, administrations …show more content…
New Yorker, 0028792X, , Vol. 91, Issue 23). In accordance with both of these rulings, speech codes should not be able to silence unpopular opinions solely for being unpopular, nor should they be able to censor conservative opinions unless they are advocating hate speech or violence. An example of campus speech codes being overturned in court can be seen in “College Republicans v. Reed,” where a school group was punished by campus administration for disrepecting “Allah” during an anti-terrorism rally. The group was accused of engaging in actions that disrespected a religion, violating the San Fransisco State University student conduct code, and engaging in incivility. They were directed to a disciplinary council to face formal charges of misconduct. The group challenged their punishment by taking it to the United States District Court, N.D. California, where the court ruled in favor of protecting unpopular opinions, and asserted that speech codes were allowed to target harassment and intimidation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Speech codes limit freedom of speech to prevent serious harm to students on college campuses. The First Amendment states that, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The court found that the banning of a silent expression of opinion was unconstitutional. The students did not disrupt or intruded on the schools affairs. Furthermore, the court did not express any opinion for the form of relief for the plaintiff. They decided to reverse the ruling and send it back to the lower court for nominal damage ruling.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser gave a speech nominating another student for an elected position. The speech was given to about 600 fourteen year olds that chose to attend this assembly. The speech contained sexual innuendo. Before giving the speech Fraser received advise from several teachers that he should change the speech or not give one at all. But he refused to take their advice (2). The next day, he was called in to an administrative office and was suspended for three days and was told he would not be able to give his speech during graduation even though he was at the time the salutatorian. The family of Fraser filed a grievance with the Pierce County school board, but the officer upheld the suspension. In response, to that decision Matthew’s father filed a case against the school district. The District Court ruled that the student’s First Amendment right was infringed upon. The students was awarded a monetary judgment and allowed to give his graduation speech. Later, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court (4). Later, the US Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in a 7-2 vote to reinstate the suspension, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment (3).…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I comprehend Alan M Dershowitz’s speech of “A Real Test For Any Proposed Speech Code or Policy” as accurate because it can not be up to citizens to decide which words are offensive and which words are appropriate. More specifically, I believe that adding restrictions to Americans freedom of speech would be in total violation of the First Amendment and completely unrealistic to enforce. For example, Alan Dershowitz’s states "the proper response to offensive speech is to criticize and answer it, not censor it.” Although Harvard Law might counter this by saying that they didn’t want anyone at their school to view the offensive words of Tom Paulin. I maintain that freedom of speech is part of our foundation in America and we need to use it to benefit…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Silvergate notes that limiting free speech would fall to the responsibility of college administrators who will undoubtedly over censor due to the broad harassment regulations the proposed bill contains. He supports this point by adding that the Individual Rights Foundation, FIRE already claims harassment as “the most abused tool to limit free speech.”…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus”, the author, Derek Bok shows how expressing yourself falls under the First Amendment, whether it is on a private college campus or public college campus. He further explains that just because it is protected by law does not mean that it is “right, proper, or civil. Bok goes on to show how censoring freedom of speech would cause people to “test the limits” to gain more attention than is needed and if dealt with in the proper manner, behaviors such as displaying a Confederate flag or a swastika in rebuttal of the flag can be avoided. Freedom of expression is a right and should not…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sensitive topics have been avoided in the classroom. Often when reading a text out loud, students are discouraged from using vulgar languages. Class readings are chosen so that no sexual content is present. Both Frank Bruni’s “The Wilds of Education” and Sophie Downes’ “Trigger Warnings, Safe Spaces and Free Speech, Too” discusses the issue of how taboo topics affect campus learning.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Despite the fact that the First Amendment protects offensive speech, the Supreme Court has created a category of unprotected speech that consists of “fighting words.” In Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, the Court defined fighting words as “words which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of peace.” The Court established that in order for the speaker's speech to fall under the fighting words doctrine the speech must be directed to an individual face-to-face and the words must have a tendency to cause the average person to respond with an immediate violent action. Fighting words are not subject to First Amendment protection because they don’t convey ideas and are not of social value.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tinker V. Des Moines

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DECISION Yes, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that the students were protect by freedom of speech.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Consequently, citizens from different occupations often file legal challenges for court adjudication on perceived injustice. This paper focuses on numerous momentous cases related to three of the provisions of the First Amendment, namely freedom of speech, press, and religion. The cases as enumerated shortly represent such examples, in which citizens challenge social norms and seek for Supreme Court hearing or interpretation. In addition, the paper evaluates the rights and responsibilities that the Constitution gives American citizens.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Women and Sports: Title Ix

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Stuart, Reginald (2011, March). The March toward equity: Title IX advocates reflect on progress 40 years after landmark law is passed. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 29.2, 16. Retrieved from Academic OneFile Database…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Herbeck, Tedford (2007). Boston College: Freedom of Speech in the United States (fifth edition) Cohen vs. California 403 U.S. 15 Retrieved on March 2, 2008 from http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/cohen.html…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As American people, we know that we are entitled to certain rights according to the constitution; one of which is freedom of speech. In Civility and Its Discontents, Leslie Epstein explores the limits and contradictions of this much cherished right when considering whether he would expel a student who wrote racial slurs in the dorm rooms of a University if it was up to him. He discusses this situation and topics that stem from it in an analytical yet somewhat emotionally involved tone and makes the reader reflect on the wide range of information presented about the issues of political correctness, freedom of speech, expulsion, and racism.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis: The American society has become so politically correct, that no one is able to speak their mind without facing major judgment or discrimination.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is very important to know how far the rule of free speech can go and some of its acceptions. Many things in the world can take offense to a group of people or just one thing can offend one person. There will always be something that another person disagrees with but every person has the right to free speech. The problem within the Supreme Court is the point at which something might offend one person or a group of people, but others are acceptable to it. Bok claims that the acts are “insensitive and unwise,” but are permitted and lawfully legal (Barnet and Bedau 66).…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays