Essay On Neo Conservatism
In a world in a fight against, good and evil, right and wrong, anarchy and hegemony, finding common grounds between liberals, neo- conservatism, social constructivism and realism seems infeasible. Finding an all- encompassing response to a zombie invasion can seem inauspicious, each perspective offers different viable answers, but I believe that neo- conservatism offers the most exhaustive approach to a zombie invasion.
Neo- conservatist’s view a zombie invasion as a war against evil itself, they view zombies as a larger threat than clashes of human civilization which arguably is accurate, when it comes down to morals and ethics that the undead lack. Neo- conservatist’s focus on military force and include an aggressive armed invasion of the …show more content…
Realists belief that there is no world government only adopted self help measures on a world spectrum, and the primary actors in the world are the people that can guarantee their own existence. All actors are ultimately looking out for their self and will not aid other national actors if it comes down to protecting themselves or others. In essence human’s inability to cooperate throughout history on an international rationale has been futile and failure of cooperation with the living dead will follow in the same manner. Realists believe that the strong will do what they need to, to survive at the sacrifice of the weak. If the world did band together and create an Anti- Zombie Alliance, all realists would be skeptic to join and take caution or are against sponsoring any money in the war against zombies.
From a social constructivism perspective, the undead are what humans make of them, and a counter zombie security community will be made. In this community all actors will share sovereignty and resources and only in very extreme cases will humans turn on each other and exploit each other. Socialists see that humans may have some desire to become a zombie, which creates a collective identity amongst
Neo- conservatist’s view a zombie invasion as a war against evil itself, they view zombies as a larger threat than clashes of human civilization which arguably is accurate, when it comes down to morals and ethics that the undead lack. Neo- conservatist’s focus on military force and include an aggressive armed invasion of the …show more content…
Realists belief that there is no world government only adopted self help measures on a world spectrum, and the primary actors in the world are the people that can guarantee their own existence. All actors are ultimately looking out for their self and will not aid other national actors if it comes down to protecting themselves or others. In essence human’s inability to cooperate throughout history on an international rationale has been futile and failure of cooperation with the living dead will follow in the same manner. Realists believe that the strong will do what they need to, to survive at the sacrifice of the weak. If the world did band together and create an Anti- Zombie Alliance, all realists would be skeptic to join and take caution or are against sponsoring any money in the war against zombies.
From a social constructivism perspective, the undead are what humans make of them, and a counter zombie security community will be made. In this community all actors will share sovereignty and resources and only in very extreme cases will humans turn on each other and exploit each other. Socialists see that humans may have some desire to become a zombie, which creates a collective identity amongst