Preview

Essay On Jury Trial

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
670 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Jury Trial
Having a Jury Trial is known to be a part of the Adversarial System. Which is when exhibits, evidence, and witnesses are assembled by representatives of one side or the other to convince the fact finder that their side’s viewpoint is the truer one. Contrasted to that approach is the inquisitorial approach, used in mostly Europe. In this approach the Judge is given more control over the proceedings. The judge will interrogate the disputing parties and witnesses, referring frequently to a dossier that the court prepared. The Jury Trial is held to get a less biased decision and also a more truthful one. A trial gives attorneys more motivation to present the jury with all the evidence of the case, with a final goal of the jury ultimately …show more content…
However, if he was a suspected terrorist and was one hundred percent guilty then, I don’t think I would be able to defend him to the best of my ability knowing that he in fact was a terrorist. It would not be fair to him either because he should be defended no matter what. I personally would not be able to try and win a case for someone if I know for a one hundred percent fact and truth that they were guilty of the crime they committed. I wouldn’t even give him a lawyer in the first place but now everyone is provided with representation no matter what. That was not the case until the case of Clarence Gideon. Gideon was not appointed an attorney and ended up losing his case. In prison he wrote up a Pauper’s appeal to the U.S. Supreme court. It stated that in the U.S. constitution that everyone defendant has the right to have the services of a Lawyer. This Law makes sense because everyone has the right to a fair trial and a defendant would never have a fair trial unless they could be represented by a lawyer. This has changed many things and helped turn a lot of cases around. So in other words I personally would not be able to defend him if I knew he was guilty but someone would have to because he has the right to a fair trial and to be represented by an attorney. Someone else might have a different outlook on the case because if
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury
    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Trial By Jury

    It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial System of the Salem Witch Trials Essay Example
    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Judicial System of the Salem Witch Trials Essay Example

    The following paper will best explain the judicial system used during the Salem Witch Trials, a series of hearings over a witchcraft scare that took place from June through September of 1692 in Salem, Massachusetts. The writer shall include a brief history of the events, explain the judicial system of the Trials, and give detail to what methods were used to determine fate of a victim. Additionally, the writer will explain how the Trials were based on false views that were not supported.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Instructions: A Narrative Analysis
    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jury Instructions: A Narrative Analysis

    As we walked into the jury room, after hearing the case of Commonwealth v. Miller, I had already decided how I would vote and, honestly, I determined I was not going to be swayed. We swiftly chose a foreman by appointing the one, who had been given the jury instructions, to that position. Next, we read the jury instructions out loud, in order to remember and understand the definition of each charge. Debate over the meaning of the instructions ensued for a short amount of time before we dove into determining guilt or innocence. Everyone was given a chance to discuss the case and, personally, I felt comfortable entering the discussion and debating the case. After discussion, we voted and were evenly split among guilty or not guilty. Next, we…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Sumvertice Substance: The Right to a Jury Trial
    • 8780 Words
    • 36 Pages

    Sumvertice Substance: The Right to a Jury Trial

    The role the jury trial plays in criminal cases is fundamental to the American scheme of justice.1 The right to a jury trial is rooted in our legal tradition2 and is articulated in the U.S. Constitution.3 This protection extends back to British common law, and serves as a check against government oppression by ensuring that a defendant’s fate lies in the hands of a jury of ordinary citizens rather than the government’s prosecutor or judge.4 Coupled with the presumption of innocence, the right to a jury trial serves as a “cornerstone of Anglo-Saxon justice”5 that limits potential government tyranny. At the heart of jury trial protections and the presumption of innocence lies the concern that it is better to let a guilty man go free than to convict an innocent man.6…

    • 8780 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification Research Paper
    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury Nullification Research Paper

    Jury Nullification CJA 344 October 6, 2014 Johnny Cotton Jury nullification is defined as when juries believe a case is unjust or wrong and may set free a defendant who violated the law. Jury nullification has been an option of a jury in the United States. In the legal system that we use today, jurors have the power to give a non-guilty verdict even when the evidence clearly shows that the defendant is guilty. In cases like this, the jurors decide that the certain laws should not be applied to the particular case or that the laws are unjust for the case. In other cases the jurors may believe that the laws are certainly bias against the defendant to begin with. The 14th amendment in our Constitution promises that all persons no matter race,…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Trial Research Paper
    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury Trial Research Paper

    The advantage of having a trial by jury allows a sort of "second trial." For example, in the movie Twelve Angry Men, every single jury member voted guilty, except for one. The other eleven men demanded his reasons for voting Not Guilty, and he gave them. In the end, they voted Not Guilty unanimously. Now, the defendant in question was charged with murder, to which the penalty was death by electrocution. However, the evidence, which most of the jury members did not question, was not as sound as they thought, and the man that voted Not guilty showed them that. If the defendant hadn't had a jury, then he would have been sentenced to death, whether he was guilty or not, due to the meager and circumstantial evidence…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury Nullification
    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay On Jury Nullification

    Krieger suffers from a disease and by law is granted the use of marijuana as a treatment.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On State Trial Court
    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay On State Trial Court

    The state Trial Courts are responsible for the arraignment of the defendants at the beginning of a case, selecting a jury among potential jurors, hearing the case from the accused side and the defendants side to effectively evaluate the evidence as according to the legal guidelines. After the hearing and evaluating the presented evidence, the state Trial Court is responsible for determining the facts of the case. When facts are determined the State Court is responsible for pronouncing the judgment, basing it on the facts and the legal guidelines. After making the ruling, the state court is responsible for imposing a sentence to the person found guilty.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury Duty
    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay On Jury Duty

    My thoughts on my early morning experience during jury duty selection-I noticed a few elements of successful teaching. The judge was very explicit in explaining the judicial process for selecting a jury, and in explaining the process for a civil case. She presented, gave examples, and even checked for understanding throughout the process. It was funny how I started connecting her questioning of the potential jurors to be like TDQs in the way that each question was essential to some element of the case (were there any connections to the parties involved, the businesses, workers, was there a past experience like the case that could impact your thinking or decision…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against The Jury System
    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against The Jury System

    The size that is required at the maximum number of people on a jury has been adjusted from twelve to only six and it no longer requires a unanimous vote in most countries, but to a two-thirds majority vote. This means that only four out of six people need to vote one way for it to be the standing ruling. That is if the jury even going to be tried, most cases are settled before the trial. The unpredictable results and the money involved in running a trial has also “driven many institutional litigants […] to demand that their customers waive trial by jury and accept […] arbitration” (Dershowitz 455). This allows them to make the process of settling…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Right To Trial By Jury
    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Right To Trial By Jury

    The Right to Trial by Jury is where the accused has the right to a public trial, lawyer, to know who the accusers are, what you are accused for, and a jury. The statement that has been said was that this Right should be changed by “Trial By Justices”. Trial By Justices means that cases are decided by the decisions of Judicial Officials.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury Selection
    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay On Jury Selection

    Jury selection are various methods used to decide who will be on the jury. The jury pool is initially chosen from among the community utilizing a random strategy. Jury records are gathered from voter enlistments and driver permit/state id. From these records, some people are mailed. They will be addressed in court by the judge and/or lawyers in the U.S. According to Shari Seidman, in some cases such as capital punishment, the jury must be death qualified. Jury procedures are taught in law institutions to law students. The jury chose is said to have been empanaled.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay On Jury Trial
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Jury Trial

    The US Constitution grants citizens the right to trial by a jury of your peers. In other words, it grants citizens the right to be judged by average ordinary rather than by lawyers or judges.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Adversarial Vs Inquisitorial System Essay
    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Adversarial Vs Inquisitorial System Essay

    Less bias the judge would usually go there and try to to get the truth not who’s guilty and who’s innocent. They rely less on legal representation. More likely that relevant evidence is brought out because the decision maker (Judge) controls the production of evidence. The cost is mainly borne by the state ,Written statements reduce cost. Weaknesses of Inquisitorial system are Judge is less impartial as they do get involved with all aspects of the trial. The greater reliance on written evidence denies parties the opportunity to test the evidence. Parties are not able to call their own expert witnesses which can affect the decision maker viewpoint. At the mercy of the judge Judge may form bias.Too much power in hands of the judge can affect the decision. France uses the Inquisitorial system, along with the rest of continental Europe, and many countries in South America, Africa and Asia. According to this tradition, which is tied to Common Civil Law, the truth is uncovered through questioning those most familiar with the dispute by a judicial authority. It's up to an "independent" prosecutor or investigating magistrate to distinguish between reliable and unreliable evidence…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Adversary Legal System In Australia
    • 1211 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Adversary Legal System In Australia

    Unlike the inquisitorial system used in European countries, in the adversary system, the judges are not expected to conduct an investigation into the facts of the case to reach the truth. Instead adversary judges rely on the case presented by the two opposing sides. This contest between the two parties is based on the belief that a contest is more likely to bring out the best in the parties and make them strive to win. If both sides are trying their hardest the truth is most likely to be uncovered.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More