Essay On Conflict Criminology
In accordance to the article, “Distinction between Conflict and Radical Criminology”, many issues pertaining to conflict criminology, are addressed strongly as somehow a bit discriminatory to that of the minority (Bernard, 1981). As per the article, “Conflict criminology takes a different approach since it is based on a "labelling" definition of crime: crime is whatever the agencies of the criminal justice system officially define as crime” (Bernard, 1981). From a person with a minority background, and part of the powerless percent, this statement is a far cry from the justice system we so seek. Because crime is identified towards whatever those in power see fit, it leaves little to no room for those on the bottom half of society to voice their
…show more content…
The conflict in itself is visible in the politics surrounding legislation demanding "there ought to be a law" (Bernard, 1981). Lawmaking, lawbreaking, law enforcement reflect the conflict between groups and law abiding citizens. While conflict criminologists are able to demonstrate their theory among broad patterns of crime, most crimes are also explained by different theories; for example, police may respond to crime in minority or low income neighborhoods, because more crime may take place there and the citizens may make a request for more police action (Bernard, 1981). Conflict criminology does not look at the threat of crime to low-income or minority neighborhoods. Sentencing disparity may be based on the lack of family or community resources rather than direct prejudice (Turk, 1966).
Conflict criminologists seek class equality as a crime prevention methods. In order to address issues and contentions raised about conflict criminology, conflict criminologists suggests that first, redistribution of power should result in lower crime rates overall, bond individuals together based on their shared belief systems, and making absolutely sure that there is diverse representation of the minority within the government (Turk,
The conflict in itself is visible in the politics surrounding legislation demanding "there ought to be a law" (Bernard, 1981). Lawmaking, lawbreaking, law enforcement reflect the conflict between groups and law abiding citizens. While conflict criminologists are able to demonstrate their theory among broad patterns of crime, most crimes are also explained by different theories; for example, police may respond to crime in minority or low income neighborhoods, because more crime may take place there and the citizens may make a request for more police action (Bernard, 1981). Conflict criminology does not look at the threat of crime to low-income or minority neighborhoods. Sentencing disparity may be based on the lack of family or community resources rather than direct prejudice (Turk, 1966).
Conflict criminologists seek class equality as a crime prevention methods. In order to address issues and contentions raised about conflict criminology, conflict criminologists suggests that first, redistribution of power should result in lower crime rates overall, bond individuals together based on their shared belief systems, and making absolutely sure that there is diverse representation of the minority within the government (Turk,