Essay On 9/11 Conspiracy
On September 11, 2001 one of the most tragic events in history of mankind occurred. On this day, four airplanes were hijacked; coordinated by an Islamic terrorist group known as the Al-Qaeda. This was a very alarming event, as America is known to be the most secure country in the world. This external group had hijacked four planes on US territory, which depicted how “secure” America truly was, it was only after this event were the strict airport security guidelines put into place. The magnitude of this event left some with doubts about what truly happened as many conspiracists suggested that the United States government had staged the event for political reasons. However, since this was such a large event, it would be very difficult for the government to easily conceal this event. When analyzing the 9/11 conspiracy theories, one would notice that the theories listed deny legitimate science and facts. Conspiracists have many different reasons for creating such false myths. Mainly, these
…show more content…
The science in the 9/11 attack is very weak, as there are many variables and possible explanations for what may have happened during the event. Since there isn’t solid evidence, paranoid people used this open end to come up with superstitions of what happened on the day of the hijacks. People “Say video footage of the buildings falling points to [controlled] demolition due to the way the towers bend before collapsing.” (The Guardian) There was even proof of the presence of chemical residue, which suggests that explosives could have possibly been used. However, the Guardian is a British national newspaper. Such sources cannot be trusted because they are not peer edited and can potentially boast biased content. The media is known for manipulating viewpoints for situations, so obviously such a week source of information shouldn’t be trusted with obtaining factual
The science in the 9/11 attack is very weak, as there are many variables and possible explanations for what may have happened during the event. Since there isn’t solid evidence, paranoid people used this open end to come up with superstitions of what happened on the day of the hijacks. People “Say video footage of the buildings falling points to [controlled] demolition due to the way the towers bend before collapsing.” (The Guardian) There was even proof of the presence of chemical residue, which suggests that explosives could have possibly been used. However, the Guardian is a British national newspaper. Such sources cannot be trusted because they are not peer edited and can potentially boast biased content. The media is known for manipulating viewpoints for situations, so obviously such a week source of information shouldn’t be trusted with obtaining factual