Essay About 9/11
September 11th of 2001 was a day that nobody will ever forget. It was a day full of tragedy, loss, and grief. We have always been told that Osama Bin Laden and many other terrorists were the cause behind the tragic events of this day. We have always been told that he was the leader and the “bad guy”, and we have always believed it. Perhaps we have believed it because he was wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998 bombing of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. What if this was not the case? What if it was a cover up by our own government system? ZERO: An Investigation of 9/11 covers these theories in an extreme controversially opinionated argument. The documentary in short explains that 9/11 was set up by the government, most likely in a way to foreshadow war. It also says the Twin Towers were demolished by explosives that were smuggled into the building. They further stated that the molten metal in the ashy ruins is the proof of the explosives. However this is an example of a logical fallacy because there are several different things that could
…show more content…
Yet it had not been struck by a plane. How could it have fallen down? It had not had the same force upon it as the first two, so why would it have not withstood the fire and debris? This is one of many points that are debated in the documentary.
In conclusion, the documentary does deserve credit for coming out with such a confident tone and upholding its theories of such a controversial event. Many of the arguments raised in this film are highly exaggerated, quite daft, and would require a tedious and grueling mass of evidence to prove what they are suggesting. However, if the Bush government would not have been so vague and secretive, then perhaps none of these theories would have come
Yet it had not been struck by a plane. How could it have fallen down? It had not had the same force upon it as the first two, so why would it have not withstood the fire and debris? This is one of many points that are debated in the documentary.
In conclusion, the documentary does deserve credit for coming out with such a confident tone and upholding its theories of such a controversial event. Many of the arguments raised in this film are highly exaggerated, quite daft, and would require a tedious and grueling mass of evidence to prove what they are suggesting. However, if the Bush government would not have been so vague and secretive, then perhaps none of these theories would have come