Preview

George Orwell’s Politics and the English Language: A Review

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
553 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
George Orwell’s Politics and the English Language: A Review
Vanessa Amaya
Orwell, George. Politics and the English Language. London: Horizon, 1946.
In George Orwell’s Politics and the English Language, he is expressing his opinion on the digression of the English Language. Orwell is speaking in a negative manner, because this essay classifies the bad writing habits in modern English as opposed to the traditional style. Orwell also discusses the irrelevance of foreign phrases. Throughout his argumentative essay he supports his claims to convince the reader he is correct.
:This quote from George Orwell’s “Politics and the English Language,” is what the entire essay is centered upon. Orwell states that what is wrong with modern English is that it is hampered by “vagueness and incompetence.” Writers who are guilty are like machines, mechanically spewing out empty phrases that have been hardwired into their writing processes, however really meaning nothing at all to the readers.
Later Orwell supports his point by listing and describing the exact reasons for this vagueness and incompetence; dying metaphors, verbal false limbs, pretentious diction, and meaningless words. Like any good argument, Orwell includes a paragraph with a counterargument and discredits this viewpoint with specific examples of metaphors that have been consciously wiped out by people willing to put forth an effort. In concluding his essay, Orwell lays out his solution, part of which is a set of rules all writers should follow, his solution is simple, “a deep change of attitude in anyone who has grown used to writing in the style now fashionable.” Orwell creates an argumentative essay that follows the typical structure; his point, supporting details, opposing viewpoints, and a solution; all in order to inform people of the reasons for this ugliness of the English language while calling on the reader to make an effort at changing these attitudes toward writing.
Orwell keeps a very mild tone throughout this essay, never stepping into sarcasm however not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Goerge Orwell, in “Politics and the English Language”, demonstrates how to effectively express oneself with written language. To do so, Orwell states the “dos” and “don’ts” of effective writing. Because the rules for writing effectively are so complex, Orwell utilizes parallel structure to make the body structure of his essay more cohesive: “… it has nothing to do with archaism… it is especially concerned with the scrapping of… It has nothing to do with correct grammar… it is not concerned with… Nor does it even imply… though it does imply…” (Orwell). Orwell interlaces multiple parallel structures to give the body both unity and a back-and-forth feel that keeps the audience on their toes. If he had not done so, his arguments would have quickly become repetitive and monotonous. Although Orwell specifically states that “correct grammar and syntax… are of no importance”, one can see that he has gone to great lengths to achieve an engaging effect through syntax. The back-and-forth action of the body paragraphs and his self-contradiction alludes to a rule he introduces later in the writing: “Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous” (Orwell). He then goes on to break a number of his previously stated rules, some more blatantly than others: “… send some worn-out and useless phrase… into the dustbin” (Orwell). He also uses polysyllabic diction at some points, though he expressly states to “Never use a long word where a short one will do”. His contradiction of himself may at first leave some readers puzzled, but ultimately establishes the concept that a writer should not be afraid to break conventions to make a…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Orwell Questions

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. Another “language trick” is to write by habit, stringing together “ready-made phrases.” Why does Orwell condemn this approach?…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Questions on Meaning

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. The greatest danger is that, as in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, doublespeak will lead to the “control of reality through language” (par. 23).…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Fat

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In George Orwell’s passage, his tone was more critical and serious and his style was specific and formal. In his writing he used many references and details to support his ideas in the passage. He wrote about how the English language has progressively gotten worse because of people using too many sophisticated words in order to sound smart, but resulting in losing the meaning in what they are trying to say. In order to prove his point by researching passages that are guilty of using unnecessary words. For example, on page 541 he stated, “These five passages have not been picked out because they are especially bad – I could have quoted far worse if I had chosen – but because they illustrate various of the mental vices from which we now suffer. They are a little below average, but are fairly representative samples. I number them so that I can refer back to them when necessary:” This shows the amount of research he did and the amount of thought process put into his work. In addition, he separates his passage into and organized list of topics that are commonly used wrong in the English language such as Dying Metaphors, Operations or Verbal False Limbs, Pretentious Diction, and Meaningless Words. This shows he organized his thoughts to clearly get his point across to his readers in a well written passage. All of these examples show that…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both James Baldwin and George Orwell are interested in understanding language as a political instrument. In his essay “If Black Isn’t a Language, Than Tell Me What Is”, James Baldwin attempts to legitimize Black English as a unique language. He argues that Black English is a valid language because of the role it plays in the lives of Black Americans. It serves as a means for blacks to control their own circumstances, define themselves, and obtain power. Baldwin justifies Black English by applying George Orwell’s argument that language is a political instrument means and proof of power to the Black experience. Baldwin argues, validates and makes language authentic. Both George Orwell and James Baldwin express their opinion that language is directly related to who a person is. They also both state that language is a political instrument and that it is filled with word play. In “Politics and the English Language” George Orwell states that political writings are characterized by vagueness and incompetence. People rely on metaphors that have lost their meaning and are only used because the writer cannot create his own phrases. Authors no longer think of a concrete object and choose words to describe it. Orwell believed the best fix for the English language was for everyone to be aware of ready-made words and phrases, and instead use simpler words to get your meaning across to the reader. In Orwell’s opinion language is an instrument that reflects culture and evolves as culture declines, while in Baldwin’s view language emerges to fit a socialtal need. It is the connection or “disconnection” within…

    • 267 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Injuries in the Nfl

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Orwell, George. “politics and the English Language.” The McGraw-Hill: Issues Across The Disciplines.11th edition. Ed. Gilbert Muller. New York: McGraw-Hill,2011. Print. 106-116.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3: In Paragraph 4, Orwell uses a simile to compare "phrases tacked together" to "sections of a prefabricated henhouse". That shows how prose consists of words that aren't necessarily chosen for their meaning, but instead just because it's easy.…

    • 520 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A major theme for both of Orwell’s works is the idea that people, ignorantly, don’t care about what they say or think, and then because they don’t have minds of their own they are easier to manipulate. In his Politics and the English Language, Orwell says how people don’t think about what they are writing and how they have no control over their own mind as ready-made phrases fill their paper and their mind. Then in 1984, Orwell takes this idea a step further showing how easy a civilization of thoughtless ignorance can become one of mindless devotion towards the government. In the book the characters lose their sense family ties, lose sense of time, they lose emotions, they lose their individuality, they lose their ability to remember the past,…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The misleading of information while maintaining the writer’s original goal shapes the opinion of the readrer "Humans have always resorted to euphemisms, vague and indirect expressions, in their quest to avoid and camouflage life’s harsh realities."(Halmari). In relation to Orwell the same views are held, the use of euphemisms greatly skew the true information, “The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one's real and one's declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms" (Orwell). These methods of language leave one with a lack of content to form a proper opinion about a statement or event; this is seen in the conflicts over Egypt displayed in the hacktivists documentary. The hacktivist group stands for freedom of speech, to protest, and clear language from their government. This group takes action in various ways ranging from physical protest to DDoS attacks. This coincides with Orwell’s vision, because first world society euphemism is used to provide a cloudiness and vagueness to harsh more serious events in history (Orwell). Through both Orwell and the film the desire for said clear language is evidently shown. Concluding the current state of our politics revolve around a government’s ability to use euphemisms in order to continue current actions while representing them as a viable reasoning’s to the public…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As it is mentioned in the beginning of "Politics and the English language " that "George Orwell (1903-1950), one of the most brilliant social critics of the twentieth century...", Orwell states that English Language is losing its identity. He illustrates six solutions to improve language and the language usage for explanation is manipulative. In "Politics and The English Language", George Orwell is trying to tackle the issue of English Language decline due to bad language usage, but the six solution that Orwell stated are being broken by him that weakens his argument on English Language destruction that leads an individual to have sense of manipulation.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell didn't always use negative tones; he sometimes employed positive diction to throw the reader off balance or to show significance.…

    • 590 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    George Orwell wrote “Politics and the English language”, in his essay he talks a lot about how nowadays in his time the writers and politicians use really long and complicated ways and words of saying things he even called the language of his time “ ugly and inaccurate”, when really they should just be short and straight to the point. His argument made so much sense that’s just so understandable.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Farm

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Orwell warned if writers continue to rationalize these types of writing, the English language will slowly become increasingly unoriginal throughout all writing and there would be a standard for ideas, making the circulation of new and creative ideas…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My first point is the fact that Orwell admits to using the same bad language that he writes about! In the essay Politics and the English Language George Orwell says, and I quote, “Look back through this essay, and for certain you will find that I have again and again committed the very faults I am protesting against.” Now this sounds just like a high school girl if you ask me. They argue a point, argue it again, and then apologize and admit to being hypocritical. Some people out there will say that even though Orwell was a hypocrite, he was very qualified to write this paper. I agree with you on that. He was very, and I mean VERY, qualified to write this essay but that alone does not make hypocrisy okay. That’s just like saying that its right for the KKK to lynch black people and then write a book about how people should be…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Orwell experiments with ‘a mere description of what I was doing and the things I saw’ and naturalistic books before he becomes a political writer. Why a political writer? Well, it is the age he lives in that forces him into it. His working in the Indian Imperial Police at the time is another piece of evidence motivating his inability to stay away from political issues. After listing the ‘four motives for writing’, Orwell confesses that ‘I am a person in whom the first three motives would outweigh the fourth. In a peaceful age I might have written ornate or merely descriptive books, and might have remained almost unaware of my political loyalties.’ If he is still not sure what side to take, it is the Spanish war that clears his views in this respect. ‘The Spanish war and other events in 1936-37 turned the scale and thereafter I knew where I stood. Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written directly or indirectly against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism.’ Nevertheless, the author declares that ‘I could not do the work of writing a book,…., if it were not also an aesthetic experience.’ In order to make clear that there are not only problems of ‘construction and language’, but also of ‘truthfulness’ when writing in this way, Orwell gives his political book ‘Homage to Catalonia’ as an example. He specifies that it preserves the writer’s literary instinct while it does not fail to tell truth. Furthermore, the writer mentions ‘Animal Farm’ as being his first book in which he successfully combines the ‘political purpose’ with the artistic one. Putting down the four reasons of writing Orwell states that ‘no book is genuinely free from political bias.’ He continues by…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays