erp vendor selection
Decision Support Systems 50 (2011) 480–490
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Decision Support Systems j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / d s s
An empirical investigation of the impacts of internal/external facilitators on the project success of ERP: A structural equation model
Wen-Hsien Tsai a,⁎, Michael J. Shaw b, Yi-Wen Fan c, Jau-Yang Liu d, Kuen-Chang Lee a, Hui-Chiao Chen a a Department of Business Administration, National Central University, Jhongli, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan
Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA
Department of Information Management, National Central University, Jhongli, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan d Department of Accounting, Chinese Culture University, Yang-Ming-Shan, Taipei 11192, Taiwan b c
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 30 January 2010
Received in revised form 20 August 2010
Accepted 3 November 2010
Available online 7 November 2010
Keywords:
Enterprise resource planning (ERP)
SERVQUAL
Project management (PM)
Information systems success
System performance
System vendor
Implementation consultant
a b s t r a c t
In recent years many companies have improved their business performance and competitive position by implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. This study goes beyond the boundaries of an individual organization to develop an integrated framework for successful implementation of ERP systems.
We also discuss the internal/external facilitators which make this possible. Meanwhile, the authors utilize the
SERVQUAL instrument, project management and information systems success theory in our empirically investigation of the roles and interdependent relationships of system vendors, consultants, project management and system performance, based on existing measures suitable for this study. The results reveal a significant causal relationship
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Decision Support Systems j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / d s s
An empirical investigation of the impacts of internal/external facilitators on the project success of ERP: A structural equation model
Wen-Hsien Tsai a,⁎, Michael J. Shaw b, Yi-Wen Fan c, Jau-Yang Liu d, Kuen-Chang Lee a, Hui-Chiao Chen a a Department of Business Administration, National Central University, Jhongli, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan
Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA
Department of Information Management, National Central University, Jhongli, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan d Department of Accounting, Chinese Culture University, Yang-Ming-Shan, Taipei 11192, Taiwan b c
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 30 January 2010
Received in revised form 20 August 2010
Accepted 3 November 2010
Available online 7 November 2010
Keywords:
Enterprise resource planning (ERP)
SERVQUAL
Project management (PM)
Information systems success
System performance
System vendor
Implementation consultant
a b s t r a c t
In recent years many companies have improved their business performance and competitive position by implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. This study goes beyond the boundaries of an individual organization to develop an integrated framework for successful implementation of ERP systems.
We also discuss the internal/external facilitators which make this possible. Meanwhile, the authors utilize the
SERVQUAL instrument, project management and information systems success theory in our empirically investigation of the roles and interdependent relationships of system vendors, consultants, project management and system performance, based on existing measures suitable for this study. The results reveal a significant causal relationship
References: [1] F. Adam, D. Twomey, Purchasing critical information systems — the Bord Gais case study, Systèmes d ' Information et Management 6 (3) (2001) 75–96. W.-H. Tsai et al. / Decision Support Systems 50 (2011) 480–490 [2] N revelation, International Journal of Project Management 24 (4) (2006) 358–370. [3] D. Aloini, R. Dulmin, V. Mininno, Risk management in ERP project introduction: review of the literature, Information & Management 44 (6) (2007) 547–567. [4] R.P. Bagozzi, Y. Yi, On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (1) (1988) 74–94. (2008) 833–844. [6] P.M. Bentler, D.G. Bonett, Significance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Psychological Bulletin 88 (3) (1980) 588–606. Management 45 (5) (2008) 257–269. [8] P. Bingi, M. Sharma, J. Godla, Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation, Information Systems Management 16 (3) (1999) 7–14. [9] V. Botta-Genoulaz, P.A. Millet, B. Grabot, A survey on the recent research literature on ERP systems, Computers in Industry 56 (6) (2005) 510–522. [11] A. Caruana, M.T. Ewing, B. Ramaseshan, Assessment of the three-column format SERVQUAL: an experimental approach, Journal of Business Research 49 (1) (2000) [12] S.W. Chou, Y.C. Chang, The implementation factors that influence the ERP (enterprise resource planning) benefits, Decision Support Systems 46 (1) (2008) [13] D.I. Cleland, L.R. Ireland, The Project Manager 's Portable Handbook: The Discipline of Project Management, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2000. Hoadley, I. Benbasat (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Baltimore, MD, 1998. [15] T.H. Davenport, Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 2000. [16] R.H. Deane, T.B. Clark, Creating a learning project environment, Information System Management 14 (3) (1997) 54–61. [17] W. DeLone, E. McLean, Information system success: the quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research 3 (1) (1992) 60–95. (2003) 9–30. [20] K. Dong-Gil, Determinants of knowledge transfer in enterprise resource planning implementation (Doctoral dissertation), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 2002. Fleischer (Eds.), The Processes of Technological Innovation, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1990. Seattle, Washington, 2003. [23] J.F. Hair, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, W.C. Black, Multivariate data analysis: with readings, 5th ed.Prentice Hall College, New Jersey, NJ, 1998. [24] L.A. Hayduk, Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1987. 19 (1) (2002) 71–98. [26] C.W. Holsapple, M.P. Sena, ERP plans and decision-support benefits, Decision Support Systems 38 (4) (2005) 575–590. (1999) 1–55. Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management 4 (4) (2006) 355–378. [29] M.A. Janson, A. Subramanian, Packaged software: selection and implementation policies, INFOR 334 (1996) 133–151. [30] H. Kang, G. Bradley, Measuring the performance of IT services: an assessment of SERVQUAL, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 3 (3) (2002) [31] R.S. Kaplan, D.P. Norton, The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1992. [32] W. Ke, W.K. Wei, Organizational culture and leadership in ERP implementation, Decision Support Systems 45 (2) (2008) 208–218. [33] G. Klein, W.B. Martz, The metronome of technology transfer, Comparative Technology Transfer and Society 1 (3) (2003) 243–254. [34] D. Ko, J.L. Kirsch, W.R. King, Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations, MIS Quarterly 29 (1) (2005) [35] S.P. Laughlin, An ERP game plan, Journal of Business Strategy 20 (1) (1999) 32–37. [36] K.R. Linberg, Software developer perceptions about software project failure: a case study, Journal of Systems and Software 49 (2/3) (1999) 177–192. [37] I.N. Lings, R.F. Brooks, Implementing and measuring the effectiveness of internal marketing, Journal of Marketing Management 14 (4/5) (1998) 325–351. of the empirical literature, Oxford Surveys in Information Technology, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1987. 146 (2) (2003) 302–314.