Preview

Eric And Shelia's Relationship Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1030 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Eric And Shelia's Relationship Analysis
Eric’s attitude towards various characters changes over the course of the play. In the beginning, Eric and Shelia appear to have a fairly typical sibling relationship with Eric’s obvious drunkenness- ‘Eric suddenly guffaws’ obviously exasperating Shelia- ‘You’re squiffy’, who is excited because she is celebrating her engagement party. By the end of the play, Eric and Shelia appear to have improved their relationship with each other, as Eric starts to agree with Shelia ‘she’s right’, but lost a great deal of trust in their relationship with their parents. Both Eric and Shelia agree with the Inspector that ‘we are all responsible for each other’. They both represent the socialist views typically held of the younger generation. This was hinted …show more content…
Eric seems desperate for his father’s approval, and for Mr Birling to show any sort of affection or love towards Eric, which Mr Birling is oblivious to ‘Because you’re not the kind of father a chap could go to when he’s in trouble’. However, by the end of the play, Eric does not appear to care what his father thinks of him, as when Mr Birling says to Eric ‘You’re the one I blame for this’, and Eric replies ‘I’ll bet I am… I don’t care now’. If Mr Birling had said that to Eric in the beginning of Act 1, Eric would have assumed that it is his fault, and would have begged for Mr Birling’s forgiveness. Eric also now realises that his parents are not perfect- ‘I’m ashamed of you as well- yes both of you’. In addition, after Inspector Goole leaves the Birling’s, after his speech about capitalism and communism, one of the first things that Mr Birling says is that ‘There’ll be a public scandal… I was almost certain for a knighthood in the next Honours list’. This reveals how little Mr Birling learns or cares about what happened, and also how he is not in the slightest concerned about Eric’s welfare after he has heard such shocking news. Mr Birling also tries to blame Eric by accusing Eric- ‘you’ve been spoilt’. In addition, Mr Birling takes no responsibility for Eric allegedly spoiling Eric, even though Mr Birling played a big part in helping to raise Eric. Even though Eric appears to be very jealous of Gerald and Mr Birling’s relationship, as they both stay in the dinning room while Eric, Shelia and Mrs Birling go into the drawing room. This shows how Eric is not yet considered a man, and still viewed as a child, which is why he goes with his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As soon as they meet in act one, Birling attempts to show his social superiority to the Inspector, boasting about his contacts in the police force, this shows Birlings character and the type of person he is, big headed and boastfull. Within the play Mr and Mrs Birling seems to be the only characters that are unable to accept the fact that they helped in the death of eva smith. In contrast to Mr and Mrs Birling Sheila has total opposite views and realises what she did was wrong, and wishes that she could go back and never get Eva sacked-…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we first meet the Birlings in Act 1, everything seems calm and they look like a perfect family. However, nearer the end the family gets left behind in a mess after the Inspector leaves. At the start Gerald says ‘You seem to be a nice well-behaved family’ and Birling replies ‘We think we are’. These lines are the first of dramatic irony Priestley uses: the last thing the Birlings have been is well-behaved. Everyone blames each other for all this which shows that they are no longer the polite and polished family they were pretending to be in Act 1. The audience will later realise that the hierarchy at the beginning is destroyed after the Inspector’s investigation. Moreover, these lines also suggest the alliance between Gerald and Birling, two men who share the same values.…

    • 1682 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Continuing further we can analyse Mrs Birling by evaluating her experience with finding out that Eric is the father of Eva Smith's child and when Mrs Birling discovers the truth about her son she becomes very refusing about the fact. ‘I don't believe it I won't believe it’ and ‘Beside you're not that type- you don't get drunk’ and is very quick to drop the motherly visage and gives up on her son again ‘I simply couldn’t stay there’ pretending to be a loving mother until things go wrong.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theme of social class is most apparent through the character of Arthur Birling, his ignorant and selfish personality has evidently been very much shaped by the money and success which he has attained through his role as the town mayor. However although Arthur Birling’s earlier life are not mentioned in the play it is evident to the audience that Mr.Birling is not a member of the higher class because of his family, but solely by his work and the money he has received. This is shown as Mr Birling finds himself being corrected by his wife, his social superior. When Mr Birling requests that the cook is to be thanked for the meal Mrs Birling almost immediately responds “Arthur, you’re not supposed to say such things”, the fact that Mr Birling has to be corrected by his wife about the way he acts and speaks almost mirrors the relationship between a mother and child as though Mrs Birling is teaching Mr Birling the correct way to act as a member of a higher class, magnifying the fact that Mr Birling evidently wasn’t taught these as a child again showing his true social standing.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with Eric isn’t very mature or well established in the ranks of the family. Both of the children are treated as kids even though they are in their 20’s ‘She makes fun of him and Birling cuts him off before he can finish speaking/delivering his speech’. Thus showing Birling’s little respect or opinion of his son. The first we hear about him in the play ‘Eric suddenly guffaws’ he is then unable to explain his laughter and is somewhat nervous about something ‘I don’t know really-suddenly I felt I just had to laugh’. The moment itself wasn’t an amusing one, but this just gives me a picture of a young child sniggering to themselves in a corner, then realising they have done wrong and then persisting to be quite This first line is significant because it builds him up as a character and J B Priestley has cleverly thought of Eric’s opening line. This then impacts the reader by showing them immediately that he is treated like a boy so then acts like a boy. Priestley’s use of dialogue helps to portray Eric as a character of foolishness and…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A) Evaluate and brainstorm how to maintain the progress Leslie and Lemuel have been making in their relationship…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mother and Eric

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Explanation: in this quotation we learn more about the character Eric “early twenties” suggests that he is young and has a lot to look forward to in life. The word “half shy half assertive” suggests that Eric could be feeling awkward within the celebration of his sisters Sheila’s engagement also it could mean that he has mood swings. Overall this quotation indicates the audience that he might be dunk.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Act 1, Priestley uses the character of Inspector Goole to arrive unexpectedly at the Birlings household and not only shatter the very foundations of their lives but challenge us all to examine our senses of right and wrong. His use of the Inspector opens the door to explore responsibility in this play as he one by one challenges them to reveal their guilt. I think that the idea of the play and particularly the role of the Inspector are to try to bring the Birling family to understand that they have a moral responsibility for the death of Eva Smith, if not a legal one. Therefore it could be said that Eva Smith was simply a victim of her class and time. This point is very significant and is the basis of the entire play, to grasp it is imperative to the understanding of the play, without this, an analysis of responsibility would be far more difficult.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Right after George and Lennie had got off the bus, George expresses how all Lennie does is get him in trouble and that he'd be better off not being friends with him. This is Steinbeck already setting the theme by using George and Lennie's relationship as an example.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Willy and Biff’s relationship is far from great however you know that they both love each other. They both share a strong drive of determination and motivations for the things they enjoy or to provide for their family. Willy understands the fundamentals of sales and what sacrifice it takes to do so. However in the sense I just watched I would also say he is highly tempered and even though he loves his family I fear that he also could at any time an abuse them. My conclusion to this is because every time his wife went to speak he would raise or even yell at her. Willy seems to live much though his sons lives and when Biff decides to go into business to support his parents Willy becomes extremely happy and overbarring. Biff has lived his life…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trouble Makers for Hamlet

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Horatio is in many ways, Hamlet’s right hand man. Hamlet reveals his plans to take revenge on Claudius to him, and Horatio decides to conspire with him. However, throughout the play Hamlet looks down on Horatio as inferior. In Act act three scene two Hamlet says to Horatio “Nay, do not think I flatter. For what advancement may I hope from thee, that no revenue hast but thy good spirits, to feed and clothe thee? Why should the poor be flattered?”. Hamlet points out the fact that Horatio has nothing to his name. Yet Hamlet knows that Horatio looks to him as his superior and he uses that to his advantage. So he keeps Horatio with him because he knows that he could not face his struggles without his help and advice. Horatio on the other hand seems to have strong feelings for Hamlet. In act one scene four Hamlet is gestured by the ghost to follow him. Horatio was worried about Hamlet and objects to Hamlet following it. He then follows Hamlet with Marcellus to ensure that he is okay.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As an intelligent and well spoken man he becomes a very manipulative and dangerous politician. With the use of his elaborate and carefully structured language it can be said that his speech is ‘like poison being poured into the ear’. Nevertheless, during the beginning of the play it is with this very characteristic that he seems like a capable and competent monarch, who diplomatically deals with military threats, personal requests and Hamlet’s depression. It is only after the ghostly plot twist that the audience is able to see the malevolent ways in which he is able to use language. As he talks to Hamlet at various points during the play it can be seen how his speech is coordinated, with flow, and almost as if planned unlike Gertrude’s. This is how he tries convince Hamlet that “tis unmanly grief; It shows a will most incorrect to heaven” (1.2.94/95). His manipulation can also be seen with Gertrude who seems to be under the complete control of the King, not only following him but protecting him under almost any circumstance. It is this very craftiness that will also cause his downfall, proving too much for his own good and in the end killing Gertrude. At the event of her death he half-heartily tries to save her, showing his self centred attitude in which he…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamlet´S Commentary

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    carries out his revenge on his uncle Claudius who murdered King Hamlet, Prince´s father, and who holds the usurper crown and marriage to Gertrude, Hamlet´s mother. The play takes place vividly over madness (as real as feigned), and the course of deep pain to the excessive anger. Moreover, it explores secondary issues such as treason, incest, and moral conflict.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the epic play Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, Prince Hamlet is caught in a universe of wickedness that is not his blame. Hamlet's disposition and demeanor vary through the span of the play. While Hamlet means well and is depicted to be extremely delicate and moral, now and again he can seem, by all accounts, to be overruled by the frenzy and dimness from the darkness of his dad's homicide. His dealings with his father's tragic downfall cause Hamlet to grow up fast. His family, his sweetheart, and his school colleagues all appear to sell out him and to partner themselves with the enemy. Hamlet makes many different endeavors to retaliate for his dad's demise, yet they all miss the mark since his game plans are destroyed by amazing human weaknesses. This shows that Hamlet is a picture of ordinary humankind and give him the room he needs to improve. His improvement can be found in a few conversations with Horatio.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Uncle Rock

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eric 's character is so cautious and isolated he barely speaks to his own mother. It isn 't until he is alone…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays