Preview

Enobarbus – What significance does he have in the play: Antony & Cleopatra

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
675 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Enobarbus – What significance does he have in the play: Antony & Cleopatra
Enobarbus - What significance does he have in the play: Antony & Cleopatra

Enobarbus is a significant character in Shakespeare's play and contributes to the drama in a number of ways. He is sympathetic to Antony from the start and is his most loyal and devoted friend which allows him to speak freely, even when he is critical of Antony.

Shakespeare is able to use Enobarbus as a vehicle for the truth and common sense. When Antony's rational thinking escapes him, Enobarbus is not afraid to speak his mind and give his objective view. This can be seen near the start of the play when Antony wishes he had never met Cleopatra, instead of agreeing with his superior officer, Enobarbus offers the rejoinder, had that been the case, Antony would have _'MISSED A WONDERFUL PIECE OF WORK'_ . This also shows Enobarbus is not your usual Roman misogynistic man like his fellow countrymen Philo and Demetrius. In fact, Enobarbus mirrors Antony's love of the Egyptian lifestyle _'BRING IN THE BANQUET QUICKLY. WINE ENOUGH CLEOPATRA'S HEALTH TO DRINK'_

Enobarbus could also be seen as an instrument to highlight the exaggerated lives and relationship of Antony and Cleopatra. In Act 2 Scene 2, Enobarbus delivers one of Shakespeare's most famous speeches, and it changes the whole tone of the play dramatically. Up until this speech, the reader could only guess about the mythical connections that bind Antony and Cleopatra together _'_ _THE BARGE SHE SAT IN, LIKE A BURNISHED THRONE, BURNED ON THE WATER. THE POOP WAS BEATEN GOLD...AGE COULD NOT WITHER HER, NOR CUSTOM STALE HER INFINITE VARIETY...'_ This poetic speech not only highlight's Cleopatra's mythical god like qualities, but emphasise the superior qualities Antony possesses, because only a truly prominent figure of a man could conquer the love of a lady such as Cleopatra. The speech is also an insight into Enobarbus's feelings for Cleopatra, as poetry such as this speech was so far removed from the character of a Roman soldier that it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In many ways the character of Enobarbus is the most accurate and reliable source for the audience to reveal the most about Antony’s tragic decline, and so therefore he is the most credible. This is perhaps most prominent when Enobarbus is talking with Agrippa and Maecenas in Act 2 Scene 3 and when Maecenas’ character tells him that “Now Antony must leave [Octavia] utterly”, the reply is “Never! He will not.” This shows the audience that Enobarbus’ character knows the most about Antony, as he is the only character who knows that Antony will never leave Cleopatra, and so he is the only character that is able to show the audience the scale of the tragic decline that Antony will experience. The fact that the phrase has masculine stresses on the “Never!” and “not” would have shown a Jacobean audience how assertive Enobarbus’ character was on this point and how sure he is that Antony will leave Octavia for Cleopatra, which fore-shadows Antony’s tragic decline as a Jacobean audience would have known the story of Antony and Cleopatra, and so hearing his character say this would have made him a very credible source that reveals the most about Antony’s tragic decline. Also, as the stresses are masculine, it would have portrayed Enobarbus’ character as a very strong and assertive male figure at this point in the play, which would have meant that a Jacobean audience would have seen the information he gives to them more reliable as the men were the dominant figures who were always correct, again making him more credible to reveal the most information about Antony’s tragic decline.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar, a conquering Roman general and the target of the conspirators, is seen as a tyrant and megalomaniac by some such as Cassius and Brutus who plot against Caesar and murder him in what they believe to be for “the general good.” While speaking to Brutus in private, Cassius reveals his thoughts on Caesar, “…he doth bestride the narrow world like a Colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs and peep about.” Alluding to the immense statue of the god Apollo, the use of simile compares Caesar to this massive structure and creates the image of a tyrant. However, followers of Caesar such as Mark Antony and the mob seen in Act 1, Scene 1, depict a conflicting perspective of Caesar. The stage directions at the beginning of Act 1, Scenes 1 and 2 highlight Caesar’s power and the loyalty of the public towards him. “A public place. Flourish. Enter Caesar…a great crowd following” and also “Re – enter Caesar and his train,” emphasise the public’s sense of admiration shown towards Caesar. The public see Caesar as…

    • 2867 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the greatest english authors, Shakespeare, had developed a play called, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar which contains various writing methods. In Act III, one of the main characters, Caesar was killed by Brutus, his companion Antony had constructed a speech for the Romans about Caesar’s death. By comparing Brutus’ and Antony’s speeches, many rhetorical appeals and devices can be seen. Antony was able to gain the trust of the Romans by using Brutus’ loyalty to Caesar. The main goal of Antony’s speech is to persuade the plebeians that Caesar was not ambitious by using ethos and staying calm and emotional as he delivered his oration.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this speech there is an abundance of emotion, spoken by Antony. He begins the speech by preparing the public, he doesn't have a fun talk ahead of him and knows this. He gains their trust by not sugar coating the problem at hand. He connects to the audience through using emotion, this is both staged and real, he knows that if they are to handle this issue incorrectly it could cause serious disturbances. Antony appeals to Pathos the most in this speech, throughout the entire piece there's a constant feeling of vulnerability that adds a level of deep emotion to the piece.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play called Julius Caesar is about the great Roman leader and his rise to power and fall from power. In the play, a character named Antony was a deeply loyal follower of Julius Caesar and when Julius is betrayed by his companions, Antony cowardly took to their side, as to be allowed to talk at Caesar’s funeral. At the funeral, however, he gives a speech that turns the crowd against the conspirators. Antony’s strategies in the funeral speech proved effective and a good use of rhetorics.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony not only played with the emotions of his audience like they were children’s toys, but he did so in an ingenious way which helped to keep the conspirators from suspecting him in doing something to go against them. He made the people of Rome sort…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He delivers a convincing speech on how the assassination was just and was for the benefit of Rome. The sheepish commoners are easily satisfied by this explanation and when Antony arrives he has to bellow to gain their attention. Antony then commences a skilfully rhetoric argument against the conspirators. The repetition of the word ‘ambitious’ by Antony in act 3, scene 2 subtly ridicules and discredits Brutus and wins over the crowd. By using this rhetoric dialogue in Antony’s speech, Shakespeare communicates Antony’s perspective and personality. The clash of the two personalities and perspectives of Brutus and Antony in this scene extends the drama and emphasizes the contrast of characters included in ‘Julius Caesar’.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Titus Andronicus Analysis

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Many of William Shakespeare’s plays are so memorable because of the protagonists presented in them. Shakespeare delicately crafts (his) protagonists as complex characters that (evoke) different responses from the audience, often leaving the audience with a memorable impression of how they initially felt about the protagonist and how over time those feelings changed due to their experiences in life. Even after the play, the protagonist’s reactions to the events that took place in the play stay with us, because they make us question how we would have handled the situations that the protagonist was presented with. This exact feeling happens in two of Shakespeare’s early plays, Titus Andronicus and Hamlet. Both plays present two protagonists of…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare positions the audience to view the assassination in negative aspect, through Antony’s passionate eulogy, as compared to Brutus’ austere speech. This is understandable, as given Shakespeare’s Elizabethan context, where the removal of a legitimate leader would be viewed as treason.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Shakespeare’s drama, bias and self-interest, more than anything else, are the key elements of the conflicting perspectives fabricated in the play. Shakepeare unites the epic legedary stories of nationalism in the history of Julius Caesar to the lyrical stage craft of the theatre. The drama provides a visual realism of the fortitude of men; it highlights the self-acting individual and their ability to supersede values of patriotism and nationalism when self-interest becomes apparent. A key example of this is the character Brutus. The characterisation of Brutus changes throughout the play. So the audience is left with the conflicting perspective of who Brutus is; they are only left with the representation of who he is, only to work out for themselves who the true Brutus is. At the beginning of the play, the audience is shown a character who is noble, good, patriotic, honourable but most of all, proud of Rome. He is also depicted to be loyal. “Brutus has rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” This quote from Act 1 scence 2, shows the inital view of Brutus at the start of the play; it portrays him as noble and loyal to Rome. This becomes a motif throughout the play…

    • 2407 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, Brutus is the protagonist and Antony is the Antagonist in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Brutus is the protagonist in this play because of his pure intentions for the citizens of Rome. Antony is the antagonist because of all of the problems that he caused for every, especially Brutus. Also, The Tragedy of Marcus Brutus would be a remarkably better title than The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. This would be play because of Brutus’ consistent involvement throughout the play, and his impact on the outcome of the…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamlet is one of the greatest dramatic characters created. Throughout the play, we acknowledge the complexity of his persona. Even without Shakespeare providing an elaborated description of Hamlet’s characteristics, we instantly perceive him as contradictory. At the beginning of the play, Hamlet is presented to us as a cautious and courteous man; however, due to the negative circumstances he has to face, we see how his moral character becomes reckless and uncivil. Shakespeare uses antithesis, allusion, and irony, to show the “demoralization” of Hamlet’s character.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psychoanalysis of Hamlet

    • 4018 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Jones, Ernest. "Ernest Jones: Hamlet and Oedipus." N. pag. Online. Worldwide web. 21 May 2000. Available at: http://click.go2net.com/adpopup?site=hm&shape=noshape&border=1&area=DIR.EDU.HIGHER&sizerepopup=1&hname=UNKNOWN…

    • 4018 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays