Preview

English Monarchy Advantages

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
709 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
English Monarchy Advantages
The monarchy isn’t as bad as you are claiming it to be. It’s better than the government that you would all want to run. The monarchy has been around for decades and these problems that you are pointing out are just a coincidence. If you think that you can make a government that has absolutely zero flukes in several decades, by all means, try it but if not, get off your high horse and stop ridiculing ours. Monarchy is the best government for the colonies because it is already established, everyone is already familiar with the rules, and because no matter what government you have the social order will still be thrown out of natural balance. The idea of monarchy has been around for hundreds of years. The English monarchy has been around for quite a while as well. My opinion is that for how long the monarchy …show more content…
They’re all familiar with the government and know the rules, advantages, and also the few disadvantages of the monarchy. If you were to switch all of these people’s governments on them you are guaranteed a slew of chaos. Nobody will understand or know any of the laws that you may as well be in a state of lawlessness. It would be easiest to stick with the monarchy because everyone already knows what is going on and there will be no adaptation necessary. If you take a step back and look at your vision as it is, a dream, and think logically you will realize that the monarchy is a very sound decision for government. If one of your main arguments against the monarchy is that Kings throw off the natural order of things, that is a little absurd as well. Anytime that you have a leader the natural balance is going to be thrown off. When you have a leader they are seen as more powerful than everyone else. That is why they are classified as a leader. If you plan to run a government without a leader that would be an eligible point, however I feel that your government will have a larger flaw than just offsetting the natural

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using ancient Sparta as a case study, I would say that the Greeks did not place a lot of emphasis on monarch. In fact their perception and relationship to monarchy was very subdued .The Spartans operated a bi-monarchial system of monarchy .In essence; they did not value monarchy, in the sense that monarchy can only be practiced absolutely for it to have a true meaning.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason being the fact that monarchs are more worried about the benefit of their county. A president for example, may have conflict of interest, whereas a monarch most likely will not. Furthermore, with a democratic republic, issues must go through a process which cannot be quickly achieved. A king or queen however, can make decisions and put them into effect with minor delay, if any. Another benefit of monarchy is they will not become corrupt because they have not made a commitment to any groups that needs to be fulfilled. They are above the influence of any political…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The British Monarchy is a show piece that stands to represent the old ways of the world. They have been losing power gradually but steadily over the last two hundred years. In Australia their presence serves as merely ceremonial with a little political power that is seldom used. However removing the monarchy from the structure of our country would mean losing sporting opportunities, relations with UK and an affinity with our culture as an English colony which steadily grew from rags to riches under hard circumstances.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, many civilizations started out with some form of a monarchy, that type of government in which one person rules a country. The most common monarchy was a royal family. Monarchies have proven to be successful where the ruler has been competent, rules in a way which strengthened their nation, and acted in the best interests of its citizens. Some monarchs strayed from these principles, and, instead, acting from greed, focused on their own personal satisfaction or gain. In France, this self-interest resulted in an enormous national debt, suppression of the lower class citizens, and…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Absolute Government

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is known that a state without government is a state in chaos and confusion. What the best possible form of government should be has been debated by political philosophers over time. To vigorously ensure the well-being of a state, the government of that state should be absolute or one in which all power is vested in a single ruler. A monarch's authority to govern should be absolute because God establishes kings, decisions would be made quicker, and there would be less conflict between differing parties.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, the way the absolute monarch governed was fairly liked by the citizens in this time period since the monarch provided the people with their needs, such as roads, and public buildings. Absolute monarch was beneficial for the people and that is why no one really tried to revolt in 17th and 18th centuries. However, later in the…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paleolithic vs. Neolithic

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At this time, all governments are monarchies. The king usually had divine and unquestionable power until the area over which he rules starts failing. Then people rebel.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone has different opinions on what works and what doesn’t. There are problems that come up between different people, different cultures, and different religions. When it comes down to the way things worked in Ancient History, one thing was always the same; there is only one type of government, which are monarchies. Back then, wars were easily started and people were always questioning the way they did things. So then you’d think that someone would have a government aside from a monarchy. The thing is though, that that was impossible.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1999, Australia voted in a referendum that would have made our country a republic. The proposal was defeated, as the way the republic was to be run was unclear, as well as a large campaign by then Prime Minister John Howard and other significant monarchist groups. Australia should become a republic, and elect our own head of state to replace the Queen and the Governor General. Why should we do this? Because the values of the monarchy, and of hereditary power, clash completely with the values of democracy, and elected power- the values of Australia. Also, having a British monarch as our head of state does nothing to show the importance of multiculturalism, and doesn’t show our full identity. Finally, we are own country, and we have our own leaders who can represent us on the world stage. However, many monarchists believe that if we were to become a republic, it would lead to the head of state gaining too much power. However, we have a constitution that will protect from allowing too much power to one person.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Constitutional Analysis

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The name of our government is The Royales seeing it went along with our type of government so well. We decided a Constitutional Monarchy would be the ideal government. The problems we have with our government can be solved by listening to the people. A problem we see with it is that to obtain certain positions you do have to be of royal blood to be King or Queen or to be in the House of Lords. This government seems to be for a smaller country/district, along with that we would definitely have to figure out how much we would actually be taxing to cover things such as healthcare and education. Once the taxes situation would be worked out we feel as though a Constitutional Monarchy would be a great choice to have as a government.…

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The British Monarchy has had a large influence on Canada since European exploration of the Americas began in the late 15th century. However, over the last few decades there has been increasing debates over the relevance of the British monarchy in modern day Canada. Over the past few decades there has been a shift from monarchy to constitutional monarchy; this means the the King and Queen no longer have executive power to do what they please, the power now falls to an elected parliament (Citation). Because of this the monarchy has taken a largely symbolic role. Many people would argue that because this is a largely symbolic role, is not longer necessary and should therefore be abolished in Canada. The British Monarchy is proven to be an effective…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many ways people can be ruled. For example, people are governed by a monarchy, dictatorship, and a democracy. In Aldous Huxley’s essay, “Words and Behavior,” the government uses words as propaganda and decides to lie. In George Orwell’s novel, “1984,” Winston lives in a dystopia where big brother, who is the government, is always watching everyone. In Sir Thomas More’s, Utopia, the king should listen to and make better decisions so people can have better lives. The government should say the truth, allow people to have privacy, and put the people first.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dual Executive/President

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dual Executive/President The idea of an elective head of state for the American chief executive, in its conception, was virtually without precedent. The idea of an American dual presidency, split between domestic and foreign arenas is itself without precedent. A dual presidency would suit America well due to the pressures of the office of President of the United States. As Commander-in-Chief, the President bears incredible pressures and responsibilities. The President not only has power in the United States, but also tremendous influence throughout the world.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke Research Paper

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Governments are built as a foundation to control society. John Locke believes that people should have the freedom of government and that there isn't a need for absolute ruler. Locke believes in a government is supposed to protect the privileges of land, living, and freedom. For this reason, I agree with Locke. Then again, Thomas Hobbes favors in more of a government with a ruler with complete power. He thinks of people as “naturally selfish and wicked”(1246) so they must have someone in charge to control them. In my opinion, I think it's a dreadful idea for a absolute monarchy.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    European History

    • 2402 Words
    • 8 Pages

    absolute monarchy is an illegitimate form of government because it infringes on the natural rights to life and liberty that everyone is born with.…

    • 2402 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays