Employee Productivity
By, Evans Mbogo
Abstract
This thesis explores the notion of whether the numerous applications in mobile, tablets and PDA platforms are definitely increasing the performance in a working environment despite their usage, portability and the alarming utilization of these gadgets for day to day purposes. Prospective business related mobile technology applications are deliberated. With the creation of multi-billion dollar markets through these platforms, we have scientifically researched through empirical data and surveys to prove if the notion is refuted or accepted.
Keywords: Productivity, Mobile Business application, Smartphone in a working environment
Table of Contents Abstract 1 Introduction 3 Background Information 3 Mobile Market Analysis 4 Application Virality 5 Internal environment 7 Empirical Data 9 Objectives 10 Literature Review 11 Definitions 11 Mobile App Usage 12 Gratification Research 15 Technology Acceptance Model 18 Domestication Research 20 Innovation Diffusion 21 Survey 26 Summary 27 Conceptual Framework 28 Research Problem & Discussion 30 Frame of Reference 33 Limitations 33 Methodology 35 Research Approach 35 Quantitative Vs. Qualitative 35 Research Strategy 37 Survey 37 Sample Selection 37 Data Collection Methods 38 Empirical Data 38 Growth of App Downloads 38 Integration of Apps into Daily Routine 39 Variety of App Usage 39 Integration of Apps into Daily Routine 40 Willingness to Invest 42 Current Findings 43 Data Analysis 47 The Purpose of Using Apps 47 The General Ramifications 48 Theory Meets Research 49 Conclusions and Recommendations 50 Future Insights 51 References 53
Introduction
Background Information
Technology is approaching another generation whereby mobile application generation is a paved way by the generation of desktop system and application. Factoring in Internet to the equation of this matter, portable handheld devices like
Abstract
This thesis explores the notion of whether the numerous applications in mobile, tablets and PDA platforms are definitely increasing the performance in a working environment despite their usage, portability and the alarming utilization of these gadgets for day to day purposes. Prospective business related mobile technology applications are deliberated. With the creation of multi-billion dollar markets through these platforms, we have scientifically researched through empirical data and surveys to prove if the notion is refuted or accepted.
Keywords: Productivity, Mobile Business application, Smartphone in a working environment
Table of Contents Abstract 1 Introduction 3 Background Information 3 Mobile Market Analysis 4 Application Virality 5 Internal environment 7 Empirical Data 9 Objectives 10 Literature Review 11 Definitions 11 Mobile App Usage 12 Gratification Research 15 Technology Acceptance Model 18 Domestication Research 20 Innovation Diffusion 21 Survey 26 Summary 27 Conceptual Framework 28 Research Problem & Discussion 30 Frame of Reference 33 Limitations 33 Methodology 35 Research Approach 35 Quantitative Vs. Qualitative 35 Research Strategy 37 Survey 37 Sample Selection 37 Data Collection Methods 38 Empirical Data 38 Growth of App Downloads 38 Integration of Apps into Daily Routine 39 Variety of App Usage 39 Integration of Apps into Daily Routine 40 Willingness to Invest 42 Current Findings 43 Data Analysis 47 The Purpose of Using Apps 47 The General Ramifications 48 Theory Meets Research 49 Conclusions and Recommendations 50 Future Insights 51 References 53
Introduction
Background Information
Technology is approaching another generation whereby mobile application generation is a paved way by the generation of desktop system and application. Factoring in Internet to the equation of this matter, portable handheld devices like
References: Cheung, Lee M.; Wong, Wing S, 2011, The Effects of Insomnia and Internet Addiction on Depression in Hong Kong Chinese Adolescents: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Analysis. Journal of Sleep Research: Vol. 20 Issue 2. Dueling Studies, 2009, Telecom Asia, Vol. 20 Issue 9, p40 - 40, 1/4p. Hodis, Monica A.; Bruner II, Gordon C. 2009, Technology Addiction: An Exploratory Study of the Negative Impact of Technology on Consumer Welfare. Advances in Consumer Research - North American Conference Proceedings: Vol. 36, p840-842, 3p. Leung, Louis. 2008, Linking Psychological Attributes to Addiction and Improper Use of the Mobile Phone Among Adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Children & Media: Vol. 2 Issue 2. Tan, Ashley (2009). Cyber wellness.Retrieved from <http://www.mindmeister.com/26570205/cyberwellness-qed527-tg35> Thompson, Hugh. New Addiction. Accountancy Age, 6/21/2007, p23-23, 1p Web-MD, 2011, Computer Vision Syndrome: Retrieved August 7, 2011, from <http://www.webmd.com/eye-health/computer-vision-syndrome> M 1. D. Steinbock, 2005. The Mobile Revolution: The Making of Mobile Services Worldwide, Kogan Page, London, UK. 2. J. Gebauer and M. J. Shaw, 2004. “Success factors and impacts of mobile business applications: results from a mobile e-procurement study,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 19–41 3 4. C. E. Wilson and S. Rosenbaum, 2005. “Categories on return on investment and their practical implications,” in Cost-Justifying Usability, 5 6. A. Dix, T. Rodden, N. Davies, J. Trevor, A. Friday, and K. Plafreyman, 2000 “Exploiting space and location as a design framework for interactive mobile systems,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 285–321,. 7 8. I. Lee, J. Kim, and J. Kim, 2005. “Use contexts for the mobile internet: a longitudinal study monitoring actual use of mobile internet services,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 18, no. 3. 9. M. Wiberg, 2005. “Anytime, anywhere” in the context of mobile work,” in Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology I-V, Idea Group, Hershey, Pa, USA, 10 11. N. D. Evans, Business Agility—Strategies for Gaining Competitive Advantage through Mobile Business Solutions, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2002. 12. M. Kakihara and C. Sorensen, 2001 “Expanding the ‘mobility’ concept,” ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 33–37,. 13. ISO 9241-11, “Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals—part 11: guidance on usability,” ISO/IEC 9421-11, 1998. 14. J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Academic Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 1993. 18. J. R. Lewis, “IBM Computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions of use,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 57–78, 1995. 19. F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar 20 21. H.-W. Kim, H. C. Chan, and S. Gupta, “Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 111–126, 2007. View at Publisher ·View at Google Scholar 22 23. K. Wehmeyer, “User-device attachment-scale development and initial test,” International Journal of Mobile Communications, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 280–295, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar 24 27. E. Brynjolfsson and L. M. Hitt, “Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending,” Management Science, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 541–558, 1996. 28. S. Tangen, “Demystifying productivity and performance,” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 34–46, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar 29 30. D. S. Sink, Productivity Management: Planning, Measurement and Evaluation, Control and Improvement, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1985. 31. S. Kemppilä and A. Lönnqvist, “Subjective productivity measurement,” The Journal of American Academy of Business, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 531–537, 2003. 32. E. Uusi-Rauva, “Yleiskatsausmittausmenetelmiin,” in Tuottavuus—mittaajamenesty, E. Uusi-Rauva, Ed., pp. 41–74, TT-kustannustieto, Vantaa, Finland, 1996. 33. B. S. Sahay, “Multi-factor productivity measurement model for service organisation,”International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 7–22, 2005.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar 34 35. E. Brynjolfsson and L. M. Hitt, “Beyond the productivity paradox,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 49–55, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar 36 37. W. Lynch and J. Riedel, Measuring Employee Productivity: A Guide to Self-Assessment Tools, William M. Mercer and & Institute for Health and Productivity Management, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2001. 38. D. Zhang and B. Adipat, “Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 293–308, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar 39 40. J. York and P. C. Pendharkar, “Human-computer interaction issues for mobile computing in a variable work context,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 60, no. 5-6, pp. 771–797, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar 41 Goodman, B. (2006, May 4). I hear ringing and there 's no one there, i wonder why. NY Times, Retrieved fromhttp://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/04/fashion/thursdaystyles/04phan.html. Hodis, Monica A.; Bruner II, Gordon C. Technology Addiction: An Exploratory Study of the Negative Impact of Technology on Consumer Welfare. Advances in Consumer Research - North American Conference Proceedings, 2009, Vol. 36, p840-842, 3p. MilicaSekulic.(Photographer).(2006). Mobile Phone.[Flickr].Retrieved from http://www.flickr.com/photos/ywds/310670770/ MRBECK.(Photographer).(2008) Rockcreek.(Photographer). (2010). The moon is looking pretty awesome. [Flickr]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/rock_creek/4441482146/ Robinson, Joe. E-mail is Making You Stupid. Entrepreneur, Mar2010, Vol Ryan2point0.(Photographer).(2011). Getac Rugged Laptop.[Flickr].Retrieved fromhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/26036894@N03/5786073932/ SportsNationESPN.(Videographer).(2011) Tan, Ashley (2009). Cyberwellness.Retrieved from http://www.mindmeister.com/26570205/cyberwellness-qed527-tg35 T Gibbison.(Photographer).(2011) WebMD. (2011). Computer Vision Syndrome.Retrieved August 7, 2011, from http://www.webmd.com/eye-health/computer-vision-syndrome Whatknot.(Photographer).(2009) 43. D. Steinbock, The Mobile Revolution: The Making of Mobile Services Worldwide, Kogan Page, London, UK, 2005. 44. J. Gebauer and M. J. Shaw, “Success factors and impacts of mobile business applications: results from a mobile e-procurement study,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 19–41, 2004. 45. A. Rangone and F. M. Renga, “B2e mobile internet: an exploratory study of Italian applications,”Business Process Management Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 330–343, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar 46 52. N. D. Evans, Business Agility—Strategies for Gaining Competitive Advantage through Mobile Business Solutions, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2002. 53. M. Kakihara and C. Sorensen, “Expanding the ‘mobility’ concept,” ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 33–37, 2001. 54. ISO 9241-11, “Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals—part 11: guidance on usability,” ISO/IEC 9421-11, 1998. 55. J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Academic Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 1993. 59. J. R. Lewis, “IBM Computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions of use,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 57–78, 1995.