Employee Motivation
IMPACT: International Journal of Research in
Business Management (IMPACT: IJRBM)
ISSN(E): 2321-886X; ISSN(P): 2347-4572
Vol. 2, Issue 5, May 2014, 1-10
© Impact Journals
LEADERSHIP STYLES AND EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION: AN EMPIRICAL
INVESTIGATION IN A LEADING OIL COMPANY IN INDIA
R. GOPAL1 & RIMA GHOSE CHOWDHURY2
1
Director and Head, Department of Business Management, Padmashree Dr D.Y.Patil University, New Mumbai,
Maharashtra India
2
Head of HR, Researcher, India for Quinnox Consultancy Services, Department of Business Management,
Padmashree Dr D.Y.Patil University, New Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study is to explore how at the western region of a leading oil and refinery Company, leadership styles (the independent variable) influence employee motivation (the dependent variable). Data of both types, primary and secondary, have been used for the study. Secondary data has been collected through published data in public domain. For primary data, using random sampling, 75 questionnaires were distributed, out of which 50 were completed.
Data was collected from these 50 respondents belonging to different age groups, educational background, occupational status, job tenure, gender. The questionnaire contains different elements drawn from a) The Full Range Leadership
Development Model, developed by Bass and Avolio (1994) and b) Work Motivation Scale. The instrument employs
29 questions on Leadership style and 10 questions on Motivation, on a 5-point and 7-point scale respectively. The survey was administered between Jan and March 2014. The researcher found that the dominantleadership styles were transformational and transactional and employees were moderately motivated. The results show that different leadership style factors will have different impactson employee motivation components.
KEYWORDS: Leadership Styles, Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Laissez Faire Leadership,
Employee Motivation
INTRODUCTION
The key
Business Management (IMPACT: IJRBM)
ISSN(E): 2321-886X; ISSN(P): 2347-4572
Vol. 2, Issue 5, May 2014, 1-10
© Impact Journals
LEADERSHIP STYLES AND EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION: AN EMPIRICAL
INVESTIGATION IN A LEADING OIL COMPANY IN INDIA
R. GOPAL1 & RIMA GHOSE CHOWDHURY2
1
Director and Head, Department of Business Management, Padmashree Dr D.Y.Patil University, New Mumbai,
Maharashtra India
2
Head of HR, Researcher, India for Quinnox Consultancy Services, Department of Business Management,
Padmashree Dr D.Y.Patil University, New Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study is to explore how at the western region of a leading oil and refinery Company, leadership styles (the independent variable) influence employee motivation (the dependent variable). Data of both types, primary and secondary, have been used for the study. Secondary data has been collected through published data in public domain. For primary data, using random sampling, 75 questionnaires were distributed, out of which 50 were completed.
Data was collected from these 50 respondents belonging to different age groups, educational background, occupational status, job tenure, gender. The questionnaire contains different elements drawn from a) The Full Range Leadership
Development Model, developed by Bass and Avolio (1994) and b) Work Motivation Scale. The instrument employs
29 questions on Leadership style and 10 questions on Motivation, on a 5-point and 7-point scale respectively. The survey was administered between Jan and March 2014. The researcher found that the dominantleadership styles were transformational and transactional and employees were moderately motivated. The results show that different leadership style factors will have different impactson employee motivation components.
KEYWORDS: Leadership Styles, Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Laissez Faire Leadership,
Employee Motivation
INTRODUCTION
The key
References: Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2006). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Sampler set, manual, forms, and scoring key (3rd ed.) Avolio, B.J., Waldman, D.A. & Yammarino, F.J. (1991). Leading in the 1990’s: the four I’s of transformational leadership Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press. Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J. (1997). The full range of leadership development. Binghamton, NY: Center for Leadership Studies. Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development, Research in Organizational Change and Development, Bass, B.M., & Avolio, B.J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Bennis W. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: the Strategies for Taking Charge. New York: Harper Row. Brockner, J. (1988). Self esteem at work. Lexington, MA:D.C. Health and Company. 10. Brooke, S. (2007). Leadership and Job satisfaction. Journal of Academic Leadership, Vol.4, No.1DeCremer, D 11. Densten IL (2002). Clarifying inspirational motivation and its relationship to extra effort. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. 12. Erkutlu, H. (2008). The impact of transformational leadership on organizational and leadership effectiveness, Journal of Management Development, Vol 13. Meyer JP, Becker TE, Vandenberghe C (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model 14. Vroom, V.H. (1964), Work and Motivation, Wiley, New York, NY. 15. Wexley K. N. & Yukl, G.A. (1984). Organizational Behavior, People and Processes in Management. Richard D. 16. Wiley C (1997). What Motivates Employees According to Over 40 Years of Motivation Surveys? Int. J. Manage., 18 (3): 263-281 17. Yukl G.A. (1971). Toward a Behaviorial Theory of leadership, Organization Behavior and Human Performance.