Preview

Eminent Domain

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
744 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Eminent Domain
Eminent Domain is the government's right under the Fifth Amendment to acquire privately owned property for public use - to build a road, a school or a courthouse. Under eminent domain, the government buys your property, paying you what's determined to be fair market value. In recent years, there has been much debate over the appropriateness of eminent domain, and further its legality in specific instances. The government is allowed to seize personal property for private use if they can prove that doing it will serve what's called "the public good". There have been many cases brought up against the government in attempt to regulate the government's power in seizing private property. There is a political push for reform to the eminent domain laws, including the regulation of compensation, hold outs, relocation assistance, and more generally, minimizing the excessive taking of private land.
Cities across the country have been using eminent domain to force people off their land, so private developers can build more expensive homes and offices that will pay more in property taxes than the buildings they're replacing. The most recent major case arguing the boundaries of eminent domain was Kelo v New London (US 2005). In this case, "the court established that the U.S. Constitution does not prohibit the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes. Instead, the establishment of standards to use eminent domain is left to the states." (Tackett, 2006) Many homeowners take issue with their relative municipalities forcing them out of their homes. However, in order to legally invoke eminent domain, the city has to certify the home/land is "blighted." "The term 'blight' is used to describe whether or not the structures generally in an area meet today's standards" (Cain, 2004.) Unfortunately for homeowners, the city determines the standards for blight. In many instances, cities set unreachable standards for homeowners, giving them little leverage in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Chavez Ravine

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Years ago, there was once a small town called Chaves Ravine within Los Angeles, California and this town was a poor rural community that was always full of life. Two hundred families, mostly Chicano families, were living here quite peacefully until the Housing Act of 1949 was passed. The Federal Housing Act of 1949 granted money to cities from the federal government to build public housing projects for the low income. Los Angeles was one of the first cities to receive the funds for project. Unfortunately, Chavez Ravine was one of the sites chosen for the housing project, so, to prepare for the construction work of the low-income apartments, the Housing Authority of Los Angeles had to convince the people of the ravine to leave, or forcibly oust them from their property. Since Chavez Ravine was to be used for public use, the Housing Authority of Los Angeles was able seize and buy Chavez Ravine from the property owners and evict whoever stayed behind with the help of Eminent Domain. The LA Housing Authority had told the inhabitants that low-income housing was to be built on the land, but, because of a sequence of events, the public housing project was never built there and instead Dodgers Stadium was built on Chavez Ravine. Although Chavez Ravine public housing project was the result of the goodwill and intent of the government, rather than helping the people Chavez Ravine with their promise of low-income housing, the project ended up destroying many…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 2005 US Supreme Court decided on the case of Kelo vs City of New London. Inherent to the case was a challenge to the concept of “eminent domain” and its relation to the 5th Amendment of the US Constitution. The town of New London, CT, planned to develop an area of 90 acres, divided into 7 parcels, along the Thames River / Fort Trumball area in an effort to revitalize the town’s ailing economy. The project was projected to create in excess of 1,000 jobs, to increase tax and other revenues, and to revitalize an economically distressed city, including its downtown and waterfront areas1. Plans…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the wake of these actions, the city authorized the purchase of property within the development area and to utilize the acquisition of land through eminent domain if need be. Supported by the 14th amendment, the 5th Amendment allows local government the powers to utilize eminent domain to take private property for public use while appropriately compensating the former owners (Supreme Court 2004). During these acquisitions nine party members did not wish to sell their properties and challenged the taking of their land; stating that the transfer of land from one private owner to another to further economic development was a violation of the 5th amendment.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, the City of Monroe, North Carolina decided in April of 2002, to supply the citizens of Monroe and surrounding area with natural gas through a direct connection between its natural gas distribution system and the Transcontinental Pipeline. The Transcontinental Pipeline transports and distributes natural gas from the Gulf of Mexico up through the northeastern United States. The parties of this case requested the court to focus on the validity of a local government’s exercise use of its power of eminent domain. According to our textbook, Business Law Text and Cases, eminent domain is sometimes referred to as the condemnation power of government to take land for public use. The town of Monroe, North Carolina entered into an agreement with the town of Midland to facilitate the acquisition of land for the construction of the new pipeline by acquiring the rights of way to local land required for the installation of the pipeline. Per the agreement, Midland had the option to tap the pipeline at discounted rate. Midland then exercised its eminent domain authority to condemn the need…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case was the taking clause in the fifth amendment which enshrines your right to private property without undue government interference traditionally takings on the public use is included highways , schools and other owned government private projects but in 2005 supreme court turned that notion in to its ear .…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eminent Domain Case Study

    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Eminent domain is the power of a state or a national government take private property for public use (Property). Before anything, the city offices should have notified Martin ahead of time that his beach house was in jeopardy of being taken away. This could have been accomplished, by the city making an offer of some sort to purchase Martin’s property before resorting to an eminent domain (Council). According to Cornell University Law School, Kelo v. New London (04-108) 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the city invoked a state statute that specifically authorizes the use of eminent domain to promote economic development (Hashmall). It was appropriate here, since the main purpose was to resolve the challenges of individual owners, not on a piecemeal basis, but rather in light of the entire plan, unquestionably serving a public purpose (Hashmall). However, this is not the case for Martin. The “Future home of the Tar Heel Family Resort” was being built with hopes of attracting new businesses and jobs, not necessarily being used for public or civic services as well as economic development. In other words, this new feature was more of a main attraction to help their business…

    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study Eminent Domain

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He then noticed that on his front door a letter was posted communicating that the city authorities will be taking his property by eminent domain to create new businesses and jobs in the community. Not unlike the mountain property Martin is now facing another dilemma in which he is uninformed and reacting to an active developing issue. Therefore, I proceeded to explain that eminent domain or taking clause is a constitutional right granted by the Fifth Amendment that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation” (Miceli,2015). Similarly, to Martin’s situation, I shared the Kelo v. New London case which was one of the most controversial cases concerning eminent domain, that precipitated protest across the U.S. Likewise, the facts from the Kelo’s case corresponds with Martin’s issue with the government seizing private property to sell to private developers, hence is where Kelo felt that New London was overstepping and violating the Fifth Amendment by selling the private property to a private developer instead of using it for public use (Kubasek et al.,2016). However, the decision ruled in favor of New London for the reason that, the city seizes the property to…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Kelo v. City of New London, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling that examined the power of the government in the exercise of the power of “eminent domain” (Scott 119). This power involves the authority of the government to take over the land from property owners forcefully. The guarantee to this power is enshrined in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, whereby the Federal, state or local representations of the government can forcefully possess or take over land from homeowners.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revere Street Case Study

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Recently the subject property was classified as being part of a historical district in which the area will not see any more buildings constructed. This provides safety from over saturation within the market. Buildings are not permitted to have improvements made to the exterior as well, without proper approval from the council. This ensures that direct competitors will not be making face-lifts to their properties and thus making the subject property less desirable.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. The Eminent Domain is the right of a government or its agent to expropriate private property for public use, with payment of compensation. I think this can be a good thing for the…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Polk died just three months after leaving office, Senator Lewis Cass of Michigan took his place. To maintain the one party unity on the issue of slavery, Cass proposed a new idea, squatter (popular) sovereignty. Under this concept, Congress would allow the settlers in each territory the right to determine their status as a free or slave territory. Sadly, Cass’s plan of squatter sovereignty failed to persuade the northern democrats because they joined the Free-Soil Party which prohibited the expansion of slavery in the western territories. Squatter (popular) sovereignty was important because without it, the rights and liberties of the citizens in the US wouldn’t be fully protected by federal measures.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rufus king was born on March 24, 1755, in Scarborough, Massachusetts. King graduated from Harvard college. However, he had to put his studies on hold because he enlisted in the militia for the American Revolution. In fact when his father died he had to support his mother and younger siblings. As a result knowing monetary issues were important to take note of in his career. He finally practiced law in Massachusetts. He was a member of the Massachusetts General court from 1783-1785. After his term in the General court he then attended the confederation congress until 1787. Since he was a Federalist his views were a strong federal government because of what he witnessed with the government’s ability to become chaotically violent during Shays Rebellion.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the video, they stated, "If one's home isn't safe, no one's house is safe." By this quote, it shows that eminent domain is happening all over the United States. The city will…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Executive orders have a long history of being for the people of America. In early United States, “executive orders were used for such purposes as the withdrawal of public land for…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    we would get the lease or not (now in question due to the lawsuit), and,…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays