El Patron Analysis
The climax of the story is when Matt finds out the purpose clones serve. This is the climax because it is the major problem in this story. If El Patrón needs an organ, then Matt is the person for El Patrón to turn to even if Matt doesn’t want to donate. Shortly after Matt finds out, El Patrón passes out at Emilia and Steven’s wedding and needs an organ from Matt. Celia tells El Patrón that when he had a heart attack a while ago, Celia poisoned Matt just enough so that his heart wouldn’t be stable enough to implant. El Patrón, shocked, dies a few minutes later. Mr. Alacrán tells Matt that they have no use for him and orders for Matt to be killed. Matt then finds a way to escape from the help of Tam Lin.
I think that the author had an effective …show more content…
From Matt’s point of view, we see that it is wrong for El Patrón to use Matt just for organs like the other clones are used for. However, if the point of view was from a different character, for example, El Patrón, the reader might think it is perfectly normal for Matt to be used just for organs. El Patrón believes he deserves to have the lives that his siblings have lost and that he also gives the clones a better life than they deserve by educating them and treating them like his own children instead of blunting their brains when they are harvested. In El Patrón’s point of view, the reader may think that Matt is being ungrateful. If the reader read the part regarding Celia poisoning Matt just enough so that El Patrón could not use his organs in El Patrón’s point of view, they feel that El Patrón has been betrayed while in Matt’s point of view, the reader may think that it is actually something very heroic that Celia did. An example of being biased for who represents the villain of the story is when you are watching a documentary. For example, if you were watching a documentary about a certain predator and they were hunting prey, you would most likely be on the predator’s side, hoping it could catch its prey. If it were the prey being chased by the predator, you would most likely be on the prey’s side, hoping the prey could
I think that the author had an effective …show more content…
From Matt’s point of view, we see that it is wrong for El Patrón to use Matt just for organs like the other clones are used for. However, if the point of view was from a different character, for example, El Patrón, the reader might think it is perfectly normal for Matt to be used just for organs. El Patrón believes he deserves to have the lives that his siblings have lost and that he also gives the clones a better life than they deserve by educating them and treating them like his own children instead of blunting their brains when they are harvested. In El Patrón’s point of view, the reader may think that Matt is being ungrateful. If the reader read the part regarding Celia poisoning Matt just enough so that El Patrón could not use his organs in El Patrón’s point of view, they feel that El Patrón has been betrayed while in Matt’s point of view, the reader may think that it is actually something very heroic that Celia did. An example of being biased for who represents the villain of the story is when you are watching a documentary. For example, if you were watching a documentary about a certain predator and they were hunting prey, you would most likely be on the predator’s side, hoping it could catch its prey. If it were the prey being chased by the predator, you would most likely be on the prey’s side, hoping the prey could