Effects Of Shay's Rebellion Dbq
1. How did Shay’s Rebellion highlight the ineffectiveness of the Articles of Confederation? In the late 1786 and early 1787, while facing seizure of their land, debt-ridden farmers led by Daniel Shays, a veteran of the War of Independence closed the courts in Massachusetts. These famers were in desperate need of assistance to pay off their debts; however, Governor James Bowdoin had no compassion and dispatched an army. Events such as, the Shay’s Rebellion convinced American’s that the national government must be strengthened. The Rebellion demonstrated the need for a more central government to ensure private liberty. The Nation had to develop undeviating economic policies and protect property owners from violations on their rights by
…show more content…
The delegates greatly feared the thought of becoming a monarchy; however, they also feared the thought of becoming too democratic. There was a great power struggle between the federal and state governments, as well as, large states and small states. Madison’s Virginia Plan to create a two-house state legislature on the basis of population was greatly favored in large states, such as Massachusetts, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Smaller states, however, favored the New Jersey Plan, which called for a single-house Congress in which each state cast one vote, as it was under the Articles of Confederation. Finally a compromise was reached that pacified all states. The nation would have a two-house Congress consisting of a Senate in which each state had two members and the House of Representatives would be appointed on the basis of population. In addition, Hamilton proposed the idea of Presidents and Senators serving life terms, on the basis of the idea that the rich (educated) had to control the nation; however, many delegates rejected that idea. Fortunately, a middle ground was reached and Senators served six-year terms and were chosen by state legislatures and representative served two years terms and were directly appointed by the people. These compromises have had lasting impact of this exceptional nation. They embody ideas and principals that are still widely accepted and …show more content…
Crèvecoeur’s Letters from an American Farmer described America as a melting pot of Europeans. Like Crèvecoeur, many white Americans excluded blacks from their conception of the American people. Crèvecoeur’s idea that the United States was a nation of individuals that are melted into one is accurate to a certain extent. The United States, at the time, was truly diverse and filled with inhabitants of all parts of Europe. Those same individuals practiced a variety of beliefs and cultural practices that has aided in the efforts of shaped the nation into what it is today. However, when Crèvecoeur’s goes on to comment on how the Americans left behind “ancient prejudices” to receive new ones, I truly believe that his remarks are exaggerated. If the inhabitants of the United States had truly abandoned their old beliefs slavery would have been abolished as soon as the Declaration of Independence was
The delegates greatly feared the thought of becoming a monarchy; however, they also feared the thought of becoming too democratic. There was a great power struggle between the federal and state governments, as well as, large states and small states. Madison’s Virginia Plan to create a two-house state legislature on the basis of population was greatly favored in large states, such as Massachusetts, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Smaller states, however, favored the New Jersey Plan, which called for a single-house Congress in which each state cast one vote, as it was under the Articles of Confederation. Finally a compromise was reached that pacified all states. The nation would have a two-house Congress consisting of a Senate in which each state had two members and the House of Representatives would be appointed on the basis of population. In addition, Hamilton proposed the idea of Presidents and Senators serving life terms, on the basis of the idea that the rich (educated) had to control the nation; however, many delegates rejected that idea. Fortunately, a middle ground was reached and Senators served six-year terms and were chosen by state legislatures and representative served two years terms and were directly appointed by the people. These compromises have had lasting impact of this exceptional nation. They embody ideas and principals that are still widely accepted and …show more content…
Crèvecoeur’s Letters from an American Farmer described America as a melting pot of Europeans. Like Crèvecoeur, many white Americans excluded blacks from their conception of the American people. Crèvecoeur’s idea that the United States was a nation of individuals that are melted into one is accurate to a certain extent. The United States, at the time, was truly diverse and filled with inhabitants of all parts of Europe. Those same individuals practiced a variety of beliefs and cultural practices that has aided in the efforts of shaped the nation into what it is today. However, when Crèvecoeur’s goes on to comment on how the Americans left behind “ancient prejudices” to receive new ones, I truly believe that his remarks are exaggerated. If the inhabitants of the United States had truly abandoned their old beliefs slavery would have been abolished as soon as the Declaration of Independence was