education and human capital
NiCE Working Paper 07-102
December 2007
Education and training: from consumption goods to investment goods
Lei Delsen
Nijmegen Center for Economics (NiCE)
Institute for Management Research
Radboud University Nijmegen
P.O. Box 9108, 6500 HK Nijmegen, The Netherlands http://www.ru.nl/nice/workingpapers Abstract
Because of the prisoner 's dilemma, free-riding, hold up and liquidity constraints schooling and training of adult employed workers fail to reach the socially-optimum level. It is argued that cooperation and agreements between the social partners and the extension of collective labour agreement are solutions to these market failures. In their decision making and accounting practice not only private enterprises, also national governments treat education and training as consumption goods and not as investment goods. Some practical solutions are suggested to bridge the existing gap between human capital theory and accounting practice, and to improve the quality of decision making.
Lei Delsen, Department of Economics, Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud
University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9108, NL 6500 HK NIJMEGEN, The Netherlands
T + 31 24 361 5933; F + 31 24 361 2379; E L.Delsen@fm.ru.nl
An earlier version of this paper was presented in the Plenary Session of Track 3
Productive Employment and Education of the IIRA 14th World Congress "Social Actors,
Work Organization and New Technologies", September 11 14, Lima, 2006.
1
1. Introduction
Human capital is a crucial factor that determines productivity of a country and is a key engine of economic growth. For employers it is an important factor that influences the competitive position on the product market. For employees human capital investment improves their position on the labour market and is an important determinant of individuals earning capacity and employability. Education is also associated with other personnel and social welfare benefits, including greater
December 2007
Education and training: from consumption goods to investment goods
Lei Delsen
Nijmegen Center for Economics (NiCE)
Institute for Management Research
Radboud University Nijmegen
P.O. Box 9108, 6500 HK Nijmegen, The Netherlands http://www.ru.nl/nice/workingpapers Abstract
Because of the prisoner 's dilemma, free-riding, hold up and liquidity constraints schooling and training of adult employed workers fail to reach the socially-optimum level. It is argued that cooperation and agreements between the social partners and the extension of collective labour agreement are solutions to these market failures. In their decision making and accounting practice not only private enterprises, also national governments treat education and training as consumption goods and not as investment goods. Some practical solutions are suggested to bridge the existing gap between human capital theory and accounting practice, and to improve the quality of decision making.
Lei Delsen, Department of Economics, Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud
University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9108, NL 6500 HK NIJMEGEN, The Netherlands
T + 31 24 361 5933; F + 31 24 361 2379; E L.Delsen@fm.ru.nl
An earlier version of this paper was presented in the Plenary Session of Track 3
Productive Employment and Education of the IIRA 14th World Congress "Social Actors,
Work Organization and New Technologies", September 11 14, Lima, 2006.
1
1. Introduction
Human capital is a crucial factor that determines productivity of a country and is a key engine of economic growth. For employers it is an important factor that influences the competitive position on the product market. For employees human capital investment improves their position on the labour market and is an important determinant of individuals earning capacity and employability. Education is also associated with other personnel and social welfare benefits, including greater
References: Acemoglu, D. 1996. A microfoundation for social increasing returns in human capital accumulation Acemoglu, D., and J. Pischke. 1998. Why do Firms Train? Theory and evidence. Acemoglu, D., and J. Pischke. 1999. Beyond Becker: Training in Imperfect Labour Markets Anderhub, V., M. Königstein, and D. Kübler. 2003. Long-term Work Contracts Versus Sequential Spot Markets: Experimental Evidence on Firm-specific Investment. Baily, M., G. Burtless, and R. Litan. 1993. Growth with Equity. Economic Policymaking for the Next Century Becker, G. 1964. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education Booth, A. L., and D. J. Snower. eds. 1996. Acquiring Skills: Market Failures, their Symptoms and Policy Responses Borghans, L., F. Green, and K. Mayhew. 2001. Skills Measurement and Economic Analysis: an Introduction Bratton, J., and J. Gold. 2003. Human Resource Management: Theory and Practice. Brunello, G., and M. De Paola. 2004. Market Failures and the Underprovision of Training Cörvers, F. 1999. The Impact of Human Capital on International Competitiveness and Trade Performance of Manufacturing Sectors Delsen, L., and E. De Jong, eds. 1998. The German and Dutch Economies: Who Follows Whom? Heidelberg: Physica Verlag. Delsen, L. 2002. Exit Polder Model? Socioeconomic Changes in the Netherlands. Freeman, R. B. 2000. Single Peaked vs. Diversified Capitalism: The Relationship Between Economic Institutions and Outcomes Gospel, H., and J. Foreman. 2006. Inter-Firm Training Co-ordination in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations 44: 191-214. Hashimoto, M. 1981. Firm-specific human capital as a shared investment . American Economic Review 71: 475-482. Heckman, J. J. 2000. Policies to foster human capital. Research in Economics 54: 3-56. Layard, R., K. Maythew, and G. Owen, eds. 1994. Britain 's training deficit. The Centre for Economic Performance Report Leuven, E. 2005. The economics of private sector training: A survey of the literature. Lucas, R. 1988. On the mechanisms of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3-42. Lynch, L., ed. 1994. Training and the private sector: international comparisons. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Mincer, J. 1958. Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. Journal of Political Economy 66: 281-302. Nelson, R., and E. Phelps. 1966. Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion and Economic Growth OECD. 1991; 1994; 1997; 2003. Employment Outlook. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Porter, M. 1990. The Competitive Advantages of Nations. London: Macmillan. Prais, S. J. 1995. Productivity, education and training, an international perspective. Romer, P. 1986. Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth. Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002-1037. Schultz, T. 1961. Investment in Human Capital. American Economic Review 51: 1-17. Skirbekk, V. 2003. Age and Individual Productivity: A Literature Survey. MPIDR Working Paper WP-2003-028 Solow, R. 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 65-94. Soskice, D., B. Hancké, G. Trumbull, and A. Wren. 1998. Wage Bargaining, Labour Markets and Macroeconomic Performance in Germany and the Netherlands Stern, D., and J. M. M. Ritzen, eds. 1991. Market Failure in Training? New Economic Analysis and Evidence on Training of Adult Employees Stevens, M. 1999. Human Capital Theory and UK Vocational Training Policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 15: 16-32. Temple, J. 2001. Growth Effects of Education and Social Capital in the OECD Countries Teulings, C., and J. Hartog. 1998. Corporatism or Competition? Labour Contracts, Institutions and Wage Structures in International Comparison Trostel, P. A. 2004. Returns to Scale in Producing Human Capital from Schooling Oxford Economic Papers 56: 461-484. Zwick, T. 2006. The Impact of Training Intensity on Establishment Productivity.