Economic and Cultural Globalisation
Cultural Effects of Trade Liberalization
Steve Suranovic and Robert Winthrop1 2 September 2005
Abstract
We incorporate culture into a standard trade model in two distinct ways. In the “cultural affinity from work” model, workers receive a non-pecuniary cultural benefit from work in a particular industry. In the “cultural externality” model, consumers of a product receive utility from other consumer’s consumption of a domestic good. We show that resistance to change due to cultural concerns can reduce the national benefits from trade liberalization. Complete movements to free trade will have a positive national welfare impact in the cultural affinity case whereas it may lower national welfare in the cultural externality case. We also show that a loss of cultural benefits is more likely to occur in the externality model.
Keywords: Culture, trade, liberalization, externalities, non-pecuniary benefit. JEL Classification: F1, Z1, F11, F16
Notes
Steve Suranovic, Department of Economics, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052; smsuran@gwu.edu. Robert Winthrop, Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240 and Program on Culture in Global Affairs, George Washington University; robert_winthrop@blm.gov. The views expressed are the authors ', and do not represent the policies of the Department of the Interior.
2
1
The authors wish to thank participants at the George Washington University Economics Department seminar; colleagues in the Program on Culture in Global Affairs in the Elliott School at GW University, and colleagues at the Society for Applied Anthropology annual meeting.
1
Cultural Effects of Trade Liberalization
September 2005
Abstract
We incorporate culture into a standard trade model in two distinct ways. In the “cultural affinity from work” model, workers receive a non-pecuniary cultural benefit from work in a particular industry. In the “cultural externality” model, consumers of a product
Steve Suranovic and Robert Winthrop1 2 September 2005
Abstract
We incorporate culture into a standard trade model in two distinct ways. In the “cultural affinity from work” model, workers receive a non-pecuniary cultural benefit from work in a particular industry. In the “cultural externality” model, consumers of a product receive utility from other consumer’s consumption of a domestic good. We show that resistance to change due to cultural concerns can reduce the national benefits from trade liberalization. Complete movements to free trade will have a positive national welfare impact in the cultural affinity case whereas it may lower national welfare in the cultural externality case. We also show that a loss of cultural benefits is more likely to occur in the externality model.
Keywords: Culture, trade, liberalization, externalities, non-pecuniary benefit. JEL Classification: F1, Z1, F11, F16
Notes
Steve Suranovic, Department of Economics, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052; smsuran@gwu.edu. Robert Winthrop, Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240 and Program on Culture in Global Affairs, George Washington University; robert_winthrop@blm.gov. The views expressed are the authors ', and do not represent the policies of the Department of the Interior.
2
1
The authors wish to thank participants at the George Washington University Economics Department seminar; colleagues in the Program on Culture in Global Affairs in the Elliott School at GW University, and colleagues at the Society for Applied Anthropology annual meeting.
1
Cultural Effects of Trade Liberalization
September 2005
Abstract
We incorporate culture into a standard trade model in two distinct ways. In the “cultural affinity from work” model, workers receive a non-pecuniary cultural benefit from work in a particular industry. In the “cultural externality” model, consumers of a product
References: Acheson, K., and C. J. Maule. 1999. Much ado about culture: North American trade disputes. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Anaya, S. J. 1996. Indigenous peoples in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. In The social life of things: Commodities in a cultural perspective, ed. A. Appadurai, 363. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Baker, C. E. 2000. An economic critique of free trade in media products. North Carolina Law Review 78:1357-435. Bala, Vanketesh and Ngo Van Long, 2004. International Trade and Cultural Diversity with Preference Selection. European Journal of Political Economy. Forthcoming. Bernier, I. 1998. Cultural goods and services in international trade law. In The culture/trade quandary: Canada 's policy options, ed. D. Browne, 108-48. Ottawa: Centre for Trade Policy and Law. Bhagwati, J. 1971. The Generalized Theory of Distortions and Welfare. in Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth, Bhagwati et al (eds). North-Holland. Amsterdam. Bhala, R. 2001. International trade law: Theory and practice. Second ed. New York: Lexis Publishing. Birdsall, N., and R. Z. Lawrence. 1999. Deep integration and trade agreements: Good for developing countries? In Global public goods: International cooperation in the twenty-first century, ed. I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, and M. A. Stern, 128-51. New York: Oxford University Press.Cable, V. 1996. The new trade agenda: Universal rules amid cultural diversity. International Affairs [London] 72(2):227-46. Brown, Beverly A. 1995. In Timber Country: Working People 's Stories of Environmental Conflict and Urban Flight. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Budge, E. A. Wallis, trans. 1934. The Wit and Wisdom of the Christian Fathers of Egypt: the Syrian Version of the "Apophthegmata Patrum." London: Oxford University Press. Cable, V. 1996. The new trade agenda: Universal rules amid cultural diversity. International Affairs [London] 72(2):227-46. Carmody, C. 1999. When ‘cultural identity was not at issue’: Thinking about Canada -certain measures concerning periodicals. Law and Policy in International Business 30(2):231ff. Coulter, L. 1995. Japan 's Gaiben law: Economic protectionism or cultural perfectionism? Houston Journal of International Law 17:431-61. 29 Cowen, T. 2002. Creative Destruction: How Globalization is Changing the World Cultures, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Dominguez, V. R. 2000. Invoking culture: The messy side of “cultural politics”. In The politics of culture: Policy perspectives for individuals, institutions, and communities, ed. G. Bradford, M. Gary, and G. Wallach, 20-37. New York: The New Press. Doucouliagos, Chris. 1994. A Note on the Evolution of Homo Economicus." Journal of Economic Issues 28 (3):877-83. . European Commission. 1998. Contribution of the European Community on the multifunctional character of agriculture. Submitted by the European communities to the process of analysis and information exchange of the WTO Committee on agriculture. E. C. Directorate General of Agriculture. Francois, P., and T. van Ypersele (2002), “On the Protection of Cultural Goods,” Journal of International Economics, 56 (2) 359-369. Gardner, B. 1996. European agriculture: Policies, production and trade. London: Routledge. Hannerz, Ulf. 1992. Cultural Complexity: Studies in the Social Organization of Meaning. New York: Columbia University Press. Haron, S. 1995. The framework and concept of Islamic interest-free banking. Journal of Asian Business 11(1):26-39. Henrich, Joseph et al. 2001. Group Report: What is the Role of Culture in Bounded Rationality? In Gerd Gigerenzer and Reinhard Selten (eds.), Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Pp. 343-359. Cambridge: MIT Press. Kahler, Miles. 1996. Trade and Domestic Differences. National Diversity and Global Capitalism, Suzanne Berger and Ronald Dore, eds. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 298-332. Keat, Russell. 2000. Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market. New York: St. Martin 's Press. Keesing, Roger. 1974. Theories of culture. Annual Review of Anthropology 3:73-97. Knight, T. 1999. The dual nature of cultural products: An analysis of the World Trade Organization’s decisions regarding Canadian periodicals. University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 57:165-91. Janeba, Eckard. 2004, International Trade and Cultural Identity. National Bureau of Economic Research. Inc., NBER Working Paper 10426. Jones, R.W. (1971), “A Three-Factor Model in Theory Trade and History,” in Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth: Essays in Honor of C.P Kindleberger, (ed. J.N. Bhagwati, et.al.) Amsterdam, North-Holland. 30 Lazear, Edward. (1999), Culture and Language, Journal of Political Economy, 107 (6), Part 2, S95-S126. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After virtue: a study in moral theory. Second edition. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press. Mussa. Michael. 1974. Tariffs and the Distribution of Income: The Importance of Factor Specificity, Substitutability, and Intensity in the Short and Long Run. Journal of Political Economy. v82. no 6. 1191-1203. Neary, J. Peter (1978), “Short-Run Capital Specificity and the Pure Theory of International Trade,” The Economic Journal, 88 (351) 488-510. Pruzin, Daniel. 2002. U.S., Others Urge Saudis to Make Proposals to Reinvigorate Efforts for Accession to WTO. International Trade Reporter 19 (8): 334-5 (Feb. 21, 2002). Rabinovitch, V. 1998. The social and economic rationales for Canada’s domestic cultural policies. In The culture/trade quandary: Canada 's policy options, ed. D. Browne, 25-47. Ottawa: Centre for Trade Policy and Law. Rodrik, D. 1997. Has globalization gone too far?. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Rosen, Sherwin. 1986. The Theory of Equalizing Differences. In Handbook of Labor Economics, O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds). Elsevier Science Publishers BV. Stavenhagen, R. 1995. Cultural rights and human rights. In Economic, social and cultural rights: A textbook, ed. A. Eide, C. Krause, and A. Rosas, 63-77. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. Throsby, David. 2001. Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Thurow, Lester C. 1978. Psychic income: useful or useless? American Economic Review 68 (2):142-45. Vedrine, H., and D. Moisi. 2001. France in an age of globalization. Trans. P. H. Gordon. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Williams, R. 1958. Culture and society, 1780 - 1950. New York: Harper and Row. Winthrop, R. H. 1991. Dictionary of concepts in cultural anthropology. New York: Greenwood Press. 31