Preview

Early Roman Empires DBQ

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
488 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Early Roman Empires DBQ
In the early Roman, Macedonian, and Persian Empires, the government, laws, and economy were major influences in gaining authority over conquered lands. The Roman Forum was the central gathering for the Romans. The Forum was considered to be their capital, and with a centralized place, comes centralized government and laws (8). The Romans also held the importance of Senators, and ruling office very close. The senators were the ones who were able to keep the native-born citizens living a hectic free lifestyle (5). Religious views and inputs were also held very high in Rome. The Romans placed material goods higher up in their life (6). Rome also classified their citizens into three different social categories. First were the Egyptians and natives who were very poor citizens, second was the mercenaries who were an undiscipled body, and the third was Alexandrians who unlike their mercenaries, followed the Hellenistic customs, and were of Greek origin (10). The ancient kingdom of Macedonia had capital city of Pella, which indicated the fact that they had a strong centralized government that provided them with laws to obey and live by (9). With the idea of their centralized government came the silver Macedonian coin that represented King Alexander II of Epirus. The coin represents the rapid growth of trade and wealth for the Greeks (3). King Alexander also persuaded economic life in the Macedonian empire. He believed that with the mingling of cultures, their economy would grow strong, and would get the praise, and he would be obeyed by all his citizens (4). The Macedonian empire had a strong centralized government, and a strong ruler, as well as a large economic variety, and plenty of trade and wealth.
The early Persian Empire proved a major establishment of wealth and trade by the making of the Mithidrates coin. The coin proves that trade was growing rapidly enough that the Persians were in need of a money system, and with large trade between countries comes great

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The introduction of a standard imperial coinage (daric and sigloi) and a uniform system of weights and measures (karshas, halurin, quarters and shekels) has greatly benefited the empire because it made the transfer of wealth amongst people easier and safer. Although Croesus of Lydia was the original creator of coinage, Darius has ensured its adoption by most of the civilised world. The coins were used as an instrument of propaganda as the coins shows an image of the king in a crouching position with royal robes, crown, carrying a spear, quiver and a bow to depict the Persian’s powerful ruler. There were numerous trade routes within the empire that facilitated trade throughout the empire, the main one was the Royal Road. It connected parts of the empire from Sardis in the west to Susa, the main treasury of the empire. The trade routes and coinage has allowed the exchange of goods from one part of the empire faster and safer as Persians usually transfer goods in bulk. It was also easier to exchange with coinage for goods because the exchange of talents required a scale to weigh the metals and assaying to determine its purity. Persians invested in a number of seafaring expeditions and voyages to attain more natural resources and new trade markets. Completion of the Suez Canal under Darius allowed effective trade in the southern seas. A stela has been found…

    • 1206 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Analysis

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is no shortage of "explanations" for the fall of the Roman Empire. Christianity, the decline people wanting to be apart of the community, the growth bad military, the unethical government --each of these has been proclaimed the chief cause of Rome's destruction. In fact, however, the fall of Rome was bound too happen since the government was so corrupt, in basic terms the base of the empire just fell apart and led to the social, political, economical and military issues. Each document in this essay explains a different reason based on the DBQ. Essentially, the problem was that the difference between the rich aristocrats and the poor serfs got bigger and bigger. The rich got richer as the poor got poorer. The four main issues were caused either socially, politically, economically and the military.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Western Roman Empire Dbq

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    conclusion. Use evidence from at least four documents in your essay. Support your response with relevant facts, examples, and details. Include outside information.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian military also helped with the government and created more success by placing the troops strategically so they could put down rebellions and gain control of neighboring land. Without the government being so centralized and free, Persia would not have seen as much expansion and success as they…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • What was archaic Rome like and how was it shaped by relations with its neighbors?…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | -empires included ‘Old Kingdom,’ ‘Middle Kingdom,’ ‘New Kingdom.’-a pharaoh was ruler in areas-commoners could gain statuses by government work-gained political ideas from Mesopotamian ways (which was caused/influenced by Mesopotamian conquers/settlements/explorers)…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Characteristics of life in Rome a. Emperor ensured citizens’ welfare b. Unsanitary 4. Uniform rules and regulations across empire E. Mass entertainment 1. Theaters and amphitheaters a. The Colosseum b. Open to all Roman citizens c.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From C.A. 300 CE to 476 CE Rome began a steady decline to its collapse. Some historians disagree with this and have other theories. One of the other theories is that the Roman Empire did not collapse as the Eastern Empire did not collapse until “Fall of Rome at Constantinople in 1453.” The base of this theory is that the Eastern Empire became the Byzantium Empire, however it was no longer the Roman Empire as there were no longer any Roman Emperors. Another theory by Peter Wells is “The Roman Empire “fell” only in the minds of people who had a particular and limited view of what the Roman Empire was and who understood events such as Alaric’s capture of Rome in A.D. 410 as marking its end.” Wells argues that the change was extremely gradual and continued well past 476 CE. While Wells theory is more valid, the empire still did not exist after 476 CE.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Successor Empires

    • 3500 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The successor kingdoms are homogenous forms of power in terms of culture, administration, military power, etc. and were all variations of the former Empire.…

    • 3500 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What Influence did Gaius Julius Caesar and Augustus have on the reforms of the government from a Republic to an Empire?…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    All good things come to an end. Rome was a seamlessly powerful empire, but just like any powerful civilization, it was bound to come to a halt eventually. After centuries of peace and prosperity and being the center of the world at the time, the empire was doomed to fall. It took many years of bloody wars, government reforms, and economic power to reach its peak; therefore, it would take many more years of wars and deterioration of the economy to a dwindling civilization. This phenomenal empire declined for many factors such as religious, political, health, and technological factors. Most of the factors came from within the city, which led to internal decay. Many foolish decisions and revisions caused the heart and soul of Rome to crumble.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian had a strong government at the heart of its driving force. The Federalistic idea of the people kept the empire together during times of peace and times of war. They did everything for ‘Mother Persia’ and did so to keep their freedom. Their freedom in government they could rural over civil affairs and command the army in war. Kings could then appoint a secretary and military commander in each satrapy, or district. These districts is what kept the large empire even more tightly together. Each of these empires had a governor, or Satrap. Also each satrapy was appointed an inspector to report on what has going on in each. Their success was put on the royal roads that could carry them from one side to the other in less than two weeks --an accomplishment in that day-- made swift travel and greater messaging for the empire. There government worked well and is glue that kept the empire together and kept it alive for hundreds of years.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 476 C.E. Rome’s leader was overthrown, causing the Roman Empire to fall. There are many speculations on what caused the most powerful and greatest Empire of its time to fall. Some suggest that the fall of Rome and the state of America now, are very similar in social, political, and economic aspects. The fall of Rome is similar to America because of political instability and inflation.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander III Conquest

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Scholarship regarding the economic effects of Alexander III’s conquest mostly agrees that because Alexander minted such large quantities of coinage in such a short period of time, he effectively inflated prices across the entire Mediterranean. This idea is supported by the Quantity Theory of Money, which states that an increase in the money supply will create a proportional increase in the price level, as the velocity and real value of transactions remain constant. Despite the fact that this theory was developed for the fully-integrated economies of the modern age, it has been directly applied to an ancient economy that existed from 330-290 BC. Yet, many other elements of ancient economies, which were by no means fully-integrated, may also…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greek however had the strongest influence during this period because of Alexander’s conquest. His empire, at it’s height, which spanned from Greece to modern day Pakistan, was conquered through a series of campaigns directly led by himself. Not once was he defeated by an enemy general in his campaigns. The most…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays