Preview

Dulce Et Decorum Est Comparison

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
693 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dulce Et Decorum Est Comparison
Dulce et Decorum Est and Who’s for the Game? are similar and different in many ways, but are both great poems. While Dulce et Decorum Est, written by Wilfred Owen, didn’t believe that it is sweet and right to die for your country, Who’s for the Game?, written by Jessie Pope, does believe this quote is just. These poems both discuss their beliefs/ideas of war and support themselves very deeply and keen. Wilfred Owen says that the saying “it is sweet and right to die for your country” is an old lie. Meanwhile, Jessie Pope says that your country is up to her neck in a fight, and she’s looking and calling for you. Other than being great poems, they both develop their point of view and affect their readers, but do it in a different way. In …show more content…
Wilfred’s point of view on war, in my opinion, is that it’s not right and people shouldn’t be pulled out of their countries to fight/represent them. In the poem, Wilfred says, “The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.” What he means by this is that the saying “it is sweet and right to die for your country” is an ancient lie because of how long it has been said and because, in his opinion, of how unjust it is. Wilfred is trying to tell his readers that war is horrible and unforgettable, you face many things in and out war, innocent or not, he is saying that it isn’t sweet and right to die for your …show more content…
develops the point of view by speaking to the reader and stating what the poet believes at the end of the poem. In my opinion, Jessie's point of view on war is that one should go out, proud and confident to fight for their country whenever they are in war or in need of help. In the poem, Jessie says, “For there’s only one course to pursue, your country is up to her neck in a fight, and she’s looking and calling for you.” What he means by this is that everyone should follow the saying “it is sweet and right to die for your country” to be able to fight for their country whenever it is in need of help. Jessie is trying to tell his readers that fighting for your country is a call that everyone should answer to go out confident and proud of their country in war. As a final point, both poems develop their point of view and impact their readers in different ways. Wilfred Owen believes that war isn’t just and people shouldn’t die for their countries over war. Jessie Pope believes that you should be proud to be called upon to fight for your country when it is in need of your help. In both poems, they explain why they believe this and go deeper into supporting what they believe. These poets defend what they believe, but it’s all up to the readers who follow the poet who they believe is the opposite of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The poems I have chosen to compare in this essay are Wilfred Owen's “Dulce Et Decorum Est” and Jessie Pope's “Who's For The Game?”. The two poems I have chosen to compare are both about the first world war. Yet the two poems have very different opinions on the Great War. My first poem, Dulce et decorum, is against the war and the injustice of it all. It is narrated by one of the soldiers who is fighting in the Great War and having to face the horrors of war. On the contrary my second poem, Who's for the game, is a recruitment poem.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I will be comparing the two poems, ‘The Man He Killed’ by Thomas Hardy and ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ by Wilfred Owen. ‘The Man He Killed’ is about a man who was in the war and is thinking about his memories in the war. The main part of his experience in the war that he is reminiscing is the killing that he committed and the majority of the poem is focused on that. Thomas Hardy did not go to war himself but it could be thought that he got the idea from a friends experience in the war. The poem is based on the Boer War. The message of the poem is that he was most probably very similar to the man he killed, as in not really knowing what they’re fighting for and why they’re there. ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ is about someone who is telling of his memory of watching a fellow soldier choke to death in a gas attack. The majority of the poem is of the person describing the moment of seeing his comrade choke in vast detail. The poem was written by Wilfred Owen, who fought in the war and it may be possible that this poem is a first hand experience. It is thought that the poem is set in World War I. The whole phrase is actually ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est Pro Patria Mori which is Latin. It translates into: ‘It is sweet and honourable to do for your country.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dulce et decorum est

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dulce et Decorum est is a poem written by poet Wilfred Owen in 1917, during World War I, and published posthumously in 1920. Owen's poem is known for its horrific imagery and condemnation of war. It was drafted at Craiglockhart in the first half of October 1917 and later revised, probably at Scarborough but possibly Ripon, between January and March 1918. The earliest surviving manuscript is dated 8 October 1917 and addressed to his mother, Susan Owen, with the message "Here is a gas poem done yesterday, (which is not private, but not final)". Formally, the poem can be understood as the combination of two sonnets, though the spacing of the stanzas is irregular.[citation needed] The text presents a vignette from the front lines of World War I; specifically, of British soldiers attacked with chlorine gas. In the rush when the shells with poison gas explode, one soldier is unable to get his mask on in time. The speaker of the poem describes the gruesome effects of the gas on the man and concludes that, if one were to see firsthand the reality of war, one might not repeat mendacious platitudes like dulce et decorum est pro patria mori: "it is sweet and glorious to die for one's country". Through the poem, and particularly strong in the last stanza, there is a running commentary, a letter to Jessie Pope, a civilian propagandist of World War I, who encouraged—"with such high zest"—young men to join the battle, through her poetry, e.g. "Who's for the game?"…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back then, during WW2, soldiers and citizens had a common idea that war is a picturesque condition to go through, and that joining the military is entertaining and a striking act to do for your country, but then poets and ideologies started to rise and spread indicating that such ideas are immoral, and that they had brainwashed people, and by writing poems, they started to diminish such fake exterior of war, and started to share the actual truth about it, contradicting other poets who wrote about the beauty of war and urged young men to enlist to military. Fighting for your country, in some poet's perspective, is a glorious act, but a dreadful act to others perspective.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If we analyse ‘The Call’, the poem is aimed at young men to try and get them to sign up for the army. This poem was written in 1915, during the First World War Jessie’s intention is to glorify war and make it out as if it’s such an unselfish and amazing thing to do. She makes it as though if you don’t fight for your country, you will be seen as cowards.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dulce Et Decorum Est

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen was written to convince his readers that war was not a playing field of honour and glory but a place of blood, death and nothing more.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    wilfred owen

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Rupert Brooke takes a totally different view on the war. Only for the title, you may not have even known it was a war poem –the soldier,…

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, www.gravesaver.com says “Owen said his poems were about the pity of war, not the “glory, honour, might, majesty, dominion, or power.” That war poems traditionally addressed. “Strange Meeting” contains this phrase in the context of a subterranean meeting of a soldier and the enemy he killed.” They are saying that his work was inspired by how the war had changed who he was. They believe he did great work by going against tradition and making his work unique. I agree with them and believe that Wilfred’s poems came from his heart and memory. He told the reality of war, what it was truly…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Dulce et Decorum Est’ is an incurable and tormented description of a man’s own experience of war. Wilfred Owen’s attitude towards war is conveyed metaphors and dramatic exclamations. The effect of a metaphor is that it aims to create imagery so that we may visualize the connection between war’s true form ad the nationalism believed by everyone. Owen’s language defines his own pejorative view, from his famous poem ‘Dulce et Decorum Est; Pro Patria mori’. The titles Latin translation is, ‘It is sweet and fitting to die for one’s country’. However the title is ironic as Owen plainly explains the burden and trouble of war. The first line of the first stanza,…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilfred Owen

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The feelings on the subject of war for most people are based on the second and third hand accounts of those who have personally experienced the events associated with the term war. Wilfred Owen is not one of those people. Wilfred Owen served till his death in the trenches during World War I for his home country of England. Wilfred Owen is one of very few war poets whose poetry reflects events they have experienced. This experience offers insight and opinion that can not be matched by other poets. It is this experience and his willing participation in war that makes his anti-war poetry especially interesting.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is dying for one’s country a sweet and right thing? Many people will fight both ways for that statement. In the poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” Wilfred Owen describes his point of view in a truthful and painful way. His captivating description of the war pulls the reader on a journey of discovering Owen’s true feelings: anger and resentment. Owen’s poem shows his impression of war using devices such as similes, imagery, and tone.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poems

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dulce et decorum est are the first words of a Latin saying taken from an ode by Horace). The words were widely understood and often quoted at the start of the First World War. They mean "It is sweet and right." The full saying ends the poem: Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori - it is sweet and right to die for your country. In other words, it is a wonderful and great honour to fight and die for your country.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I will be comparing the two poems. One of these poems is known as ‘the soldier’ and the other is ‘Dulce et decorum est.’ ‘the soldier’ poem was written by Rupert Brooke and ‘Dulce’ by Wilfred Owen. Rupert Brooke uses language in The Soldier, to give the reader the impression that dying in war for one's country is very honourable, and glorious. Wilfred Owen uses language in Dulce ET Decorum Est to give the reader the impression that war is horrible and that dying for one's country is not all the glory and honour that it seems, and that in reality, dying in a war, no matter for what cause, can be both painful and full of suffering.…

    • 804 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time Wilfred Owen was writing his poems, the world was in the middle of a war known as World War I. He considered the subject of his poetry during that time frame to be “the pity of war,” and sought to present the grim realities of battle and its effects on the human spirit. With a subject like this it was obvious that he was not a fan of the war and it shows in many of his poems. The motivation for him to write poems in such grueling detail of the war really shows his true feelings towards it. In his poem “Dulce Et Decorum Est,” he describes his account of war. In it he quotes “Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots 
But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind…” This clearly shows why he would have such hatred toward war. All throughout the poem he talks of how dismal he and other soldiers are and the terrible experience they had during war. In another one his poems “Anthem for Doomed Youth,”…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hfju

    • 1241 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wilfred Owen once wrote, "All a poet can do today is warn. That is why the true Poets must be truthful." Keeping in line with his pronouncement, Owen addresses the true nature of war in his poetry and counteracts the popular message that war is noble and glorious. In early drafts of "Dulce et Decorum Est," Owen ironically dedicates it to Jessie Pope, a writer of children's books and conventionally patriotic poetry. Owen's depiction of an incident between troops and poisonous gas clearly denies the tenet of resplendent patriotism spread by war recruiters and idealistic poets, such as Pope. By combining gruesome imagery and effective metaphors with the subtle nuances of the poem's form, Wilfred Owen decries the belief of war's glory in "Dulce et Decorum Est."…

    • 1241 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays