Though the author has sort of a harsh attitude toward the subject, I can very well understand why. It helps her get her point across and still keep the audiences attention. She tries to gain sympathy when she starts to explain the incident at the dinner table; a guest was answering a question asked by another guest and he said that he believes it is a moral obligation to terminate the pregnancy to avoid bringing forth a child with disability’s. He claims that it is better for the child, so he or she did not have to suffer. But in society these days if you think about it, down syndrome children have there own things, things made just for them, so they can have a life like every other
Though the author has sort of a harsh attitude toward the subject, I can very well understand why. It helps her get her point across and still keep the audiences attention. She tries to gain sympathy when she starts to explain the incident at the dinner table; a guest was answering a question asked by another guest and he said that he believes it is a moral obligation to terminate the pregnancy to avoid bringing forth a child with disability’s. He claims that it is better for the child, so he or she did not have to suffer. But in society these days if you think about it, down syndrome children have there own things, things made just for them, so they can have a life like every other