Preview

Dollar General Financial Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
623 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dollar General Financial Analysis
This analysis contains references to years 2010 and 2009 for Dollar General Corporation, which represent fiscal years ended January 28, 2011 and January 29, 2010 respectively. The main issues which the company is concerned about are its ability to increase sales and profitability and reduce costs in the current economic situation; another issue is an ability to repay an extensive amount of long-term debt which increases its risks.
Analysis of profitability
The rate of return on assets for Dollar General for 2010 was 6.8% thus for each dollar the company used it earned $0.068. For 2009 ROA was 3.8%, so ROA increased between 2009 and 2010 fiscal years. Profit Margin for ROA is 4.8% for 2010 and for 2009 is 2.9%. We can see an increase in the profit margin for ROA ratio as well. Total Assets turnover ratio for 2010 is 1.4 and for 2009 is 1.3. The increase in ROA in 2010 resulted from increase in profit margin for ROA. Increase in ROA might be result of the decrease in cost of goods sold to sales percentage (numbers are taken from annual report) for almost 1 percent. That might be because Dollar General cut its costs for purchasing merchandise at a lower cost or it more actively sells its private line of products. Another reason might be that the company reduced its sales of home products and apparel and shifted more towards the sales of consumables. We can also see decrease in selling and administrative expenses to sales percentage this might have resulted from the increased demand on cheap products because of the economic situation. The assets turnover ratio might increased due to increase in sales especially the shift to consumables which have a higher turnover in comparison with apparel.

Long term Liquidity Risk
Liabilities to Asset ratio for 2010 is 57.4% and for 2009 61.5%. Long-Term Debt Ratio for 2010 is 34.4% and for 2009 is 38.4%. Debt Equity Ratio for 2010 is 81.1% and for 2009 is 100.3%. These numbers are pretty typical for public

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hcs/405 Week 4 Lt Ratios

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2008 Ratio (unaudited) 2009 Ratio (unaudited) 2008 Ratio (audited) 2009 Ratio (audited) Current Ratio Current Ratio Current Ratio Current Ratio $130,026 Assets $8,380 Liabilities 15.52 to 1 $128,867 Assets $23,807 Liabilities 5.41 to 1 $130,026 Assets $8,380 Liabilities 15.52 to 1 $128,867 Assets $ 23,807 Liabilities 5.37 to 1 Quick Ratio Quick Ratio Quick Ratio Quick Ratio $41,851 $37,666 $79,517 / $8,380 9.49 to 1 $22,995 $59,787 $82,782 / $23,807 3.48 to 1 $41,851 + $37,666 / $8380 9.49 to 1 $22,995 + $58,787 / $23,807 3.44 to 1 Days Cash on Hand Days Cash on Hand Days Cash on Hand Days Cash on Hand $437,424 ($24,955) $412,469 / 365 = $1,130.05 $41,851 / $ 1,130.05 = 37.04 days $462,293 ($36,036)…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Debt to Equity Ratio of 1.23 more than 1 reveals that more than half of assets are financed by debt.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Current ratio in 2005 is 1% they had 10,250 in assets and 9,836 in liabilities…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Its 2012 current ratio and quick ratio are 1.93 and 0.75 respectively. Its 2013 current ratio and quick ratio are 1.75 and 0.69 respectively. This suggests the company is still healthy in terms of carrying cash and cash equivalents, even though its current liabilities have increased in 2013.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dollar General Analysis

    • 25428 Words
    • 102 Pages

    Efficient Production………………………………………22 Simpler Product Design……………………………….…22 Lower Input Costs……………………………………....22 Low-cost Distribution…………………………………...22 Minimal Brand Image Cost……………………………..23 Tight Cost Control………………………………………..23…

    • 25428 Words
    • 102 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ACC 230 Entire Course

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Trends in net profit, debt ratio as a percentage of total assets, and debt as a percentage of total…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The trends of the total revenue and percentage increase/decrease year per year for the four years 2006 to 2009 are illustrated and evaluated. The results of the gross and net profit margins over the four are also interpreted. The difference between return on assets (ROA) and return on shareholders’ equity (ROE) are defined and the ratios calculated are interpreted and explained. The ROA and ROE ratios of Warehouse Group…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dollar General Case

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In assessing Dollar General’s performance, we first must conduct an internal comparison, in which the Statement of Income shows both production and period cost had increased greatly which resulted in lower income; meanwhile, Ratio Analysis also points out relatively lower growth in revenues and profit margin. For external comparison, the Income Statement Comparison chart proves (Although DG still lead in net sales) its growth in sales dropped 43.3%, while its peers had significant growth. Refer to ratios analysis in Exhibit 2.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gap, Inc. Financial Analysis

    • 2904 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Debt-to-equity ratio is the total debt divided by total shareholder’s equity and this ratio is a measure of company solvency and its ability to meet its short- and long term obligations. For the major competitors of the GAP, Inc. this ratio calculated as below:…

    • 2904 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main reason contribute to the difference is the composition of assets. As the annual reports showed, SUL’s inventories, property, plant and equipment and intangible assets took proportion of 51.2%, 19.1% and 19.4% of the total assets in 2011 respectively, while those of TRS were 40.7%, 49.5% and 0%. Basically, assets like inventories and intangible assets seldom contribute to the gained profit during the period. Thereby, a larger proportion of these kinds of assets may cause a lower ROA.…

    • 2336 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Prior to 1995, why was America Online so successful in the commercial online industry relative to its competitors CompuServe and Prodigy?…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The return on assets increased 3.0 percentage points to 11.4% in the past fiscal year showing a positive growth due to increases in both profit margins from 13.67% to 16.47% and Asset Turnover rate of .59 to .67.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Their Quick Ratio shows 0.60:1 for 1997, which is not good, because it shows their liability is more than their assets.…

    • 2462 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Basic Industries

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fall in Return on Assets can be attributed to fall in Net Profit Margin. Net Profit Margin has fallen from 5.71% in 1985 to 4.61% in 1994. Fall in Net Profit Margin has been partially off-set by higher Asset Turnover Ratio of 1.51 in 1994 as compared to 1.44 in 1985.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Mms Sem 2

    • 2471 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Current Assets (Balance Sheet) on 31st March 2010 = Rs. 15788.88 crores Current Liabilities (Balance Sheet) on 31st March 2010 = Rs. 8393.86 crores Current Ratio on 31st March 2010 = 1.88…

    • 2471 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays